Corporate Revenge or Simple Error?

You aren't telling the whole story

The "rebuttal" that Chase peddled to reporters included information about other accounts than the ones held by Chase, talked about Susan's credit rating, and other details not covered by the waiver that she signed.

Chase had also said they would not be submitting any testimony, so Susan was not given the opportunity to rebut the rebuttal in her testimony. Now she has to defend herself in the press because Chase chose to attack her in the press rather than sticking to Congressional testimony.

You rightly mention the serious error that Chase made in revealing personal account details to Congressional staffers, but that's only one part of the story. What was not an error, and was clearly calculated, was Chase's attempt to undermine the process and smear Susan in the court of public opinion. And that you gloss over like it's no big deal. But it's a big deal.

Agador Spartacus of CO @ Apr 26, 2008 11:50:40 AM