Popular or Not? Your Genes May Help Decide

Twins study suggests that sociability, shyness might be hidden in DNA

Posted: January 26, 2009

By Ed Edelson
HealthDay Reporter

MONDAY, Jan. 26 (HealthDay News) -- Tucked away in the twisted strands of DNA that make you human are genes that may determine whether you are sociable or shy.

A new study comparing the two types of twins shows that genetics might affect social behavior, and the scientists who made the discovery say they are closing in on some of those "personality" genes.

"Absolutely, and we're on the case," said James H. Fowler, an associate professor of political science at the University of California, San Diego, and lead author of a report in this week's issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. "We've identified some, and we're waiting for further tests for verification."

"I'd rather not discuss it just yet, but we're working on it very actively," said study co-author Dr. Nicholas A. Christakis, a professor of sociology and medical sociology at Harvard University.

The new insights won't help turn a wallflower to a social butterfly, Fowler cautioned, in part because "genetic engineering is very difficult," but mostly because social behavior stems from the interplay of genetics and upbringing.

Fowler and Christakis have done several studies on social networking, showing for example that traits such as happiness and obesity can spread through person-to-person contacts.

Their latest study looked at national data on the social networks of 1,100 twins, some identical and others fraternal. They found greater similarity between the social networks of identical twins, who share the exact same genes, than those of fraternal twins, whose genes might vary slightly.

That finding is revolutionary, Fowler said. "There has been a simple model for the metabolic, neural and Internet networks, and the same model is applied to human beings -- that all parts of the network are identical and interchangeable," he noted.

That assumption can no longer be made about human social network interactions, Fowler said: "There are inherent characteristics that govern where we [as individuals] gravitate to in the social network."

The paper describes that new "attract and introduce" model, which allows for these individual differences.

That sort of model will have to replace existing models of social networks, Christakis said.

"A second implication is that the study suggests that if we really want to understand how things diffuse in social networks, we need to take into account people's locations in the social networks, which are due in part to their genes," he said.

One surprising finding is that an individual's genetic makeup can influence the behavior of others, Fowler said: "My genes can influence the probability that two of my friends will become friends of each other."

Science already has one example of the interaction between genes and environment on human behavior, he said. Studies have found that parents who carry one variant of the MAO-A gene are more likely to engage in child abuse, he said, but that likelihood depends on whether the parent was abused as a child.

So while it might not be possible to affect a supposed gene for shyness, knowing that there is such a gene "can help us make sharper predictions about which experiences you have will have the sharpest impact on what social interactions you have."

More information

A guide to the mapping of human genes is provided by the U.S. National Genome Research Institute.

Christakis, Mythinformation and Print Media's Hype

They’re at it again. Yes they are… As part of the Rube Goldberg contingent from Mythinformation Central. From the people that brought you “you’re fat because of your friends” you are now presented with: “your genes influence who will become friends.”

They set up the straw man: that it is an error to suggest people are a function of a “simple model for the metabolic, neural and Internet networks, and the same model is applied to human beings -- that all parts of the network are identical and interchangeable”.

They never knock it down but extrapolate beyond the data with innuendo of their own PR.

"A second implication is that the [current] study suggests that if we really want to understand how things [?what ‘things’?] diffuse in social networks, we need to take into account people's locations in the social networks, which are due in part to their genes," Christakis pontificated while showing no data or peer-reviewed research here or elsewhere.

Please see any Baloney Detection Kit for those reading content from any media channel, including Buzz Creation or Mythinformation efforts by mainstream print media to get more subscribers and kooks to buy their fading printed words.

I am looking forward to more “sharper predictions” from the Christakis Mythinformation crew.

John Bryant of TX @ Jan 27, 2009 11:18:09 AM

Even if you might be predisposed...

Even if you might be predisposed to shyness, you can learn how to control it, as most ppl agree to on this thread. Speaking from personal experience, it's completely worth it to face that initial fear no matter how strong. Eventually you'll see no harm is done...and even if a little harm is done (like saying the wrong thing at the wrong time), it might hurt, but eventually you learn the right mind-set that will help you get over those moments.

Malini of NY @ Jan 27, 2009 10:27:00 AM

your genes say much about how you interact

For people, the idea that variations in genes controlling our responses to others and interest in forming social networks is not only plausible its very likely.

1. we know there are variations in genes that control our brains and by proxy our personal responses to the world around us

2. Evolution favors genetic variations that enhance one ability to survive.

As a social creature it makes perfect sense that networking would benefit survival and therefore be a selected trait. Denying heritability has a basis in social preference because you think its foolish is hardly scientific and in all likelihood misguided.

mouse doctor of NY @ Jan 27, 2009 10:18:00 AM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

U.S. News Rankings & Research

Best Hospitals

See the best hospitals, and the best children's hospitals, in specialties from cancer to urology.

Best Health Plans

U.S. News and NCQA review over 700 health insurance plans in the Best Health Plan rankings.

Best Nursing Homes

The Best Nursing Homes rankings feature data on 15,000-plus homes. Search for one near you.

Diseases & Conditions

Get information on preventing, treating, and managing diseases and conditions. Centers:

advertisement

Sponsored Poll

What factor do you think is responsible for the majority of teen-driving crashes?

View Results

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!