Colon Screening: 5 Things You Need to Know

The colonoscopy is the gold standard of colorectal cancer screening. Here's what you need to know

By Katherine Hobson

Posted: March 4, 2009

Colon cancer is one of the most preventable cancers—as long as you step up to be screened on schedule. As you ponder being tested, here are five things to consider:

1. Who, me? If you're 50 or over, yes, you! That's the general population for which some form of colorectal cancer screening is recommended. (Those at higher risk because of family history or other factors may be advised to start earlier.) That doesn't mean you must get a colonoscopy (more later on alternatives), but that procedure does have the advantage of being able to identify and remove precancerous polyps. It's considered the gold standard of colorectal cancer screening. If you're coming up on 50 and your doctor doesn't mention it, ask. If your colonoscopy comes up clean and you are at normal risk of the disease, most guidelines say you don't need to be screened again for a decade, says David Lieberman, head of gastroenterology at Oregon Health and Science University in Portland. Some doctors believe that interval needs to be shortened to catch particularly fast-growing cancers that may pop up in between screenings or to protect against lesions missed the last time around, Lieberman says, but he believes 10 years is adequate, given the evidence and resources available.

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force said last fall that screening colonoscopies can cease to be routine after age 75 and that folks over 85 shouldn't have a colonoscopy at all. In both cases, the USPSTF was weighing the odds that a colonoscopy would catch a cancer and extend an older patient's life against the chance of a life-threatening complication. (Serious complications are generally very rare.) "I don't agree with that recommendation," says Lieberman, who says the most significant risk factor for colorectal cancer is age, and that risk doesn't plateau until about age 95. A healthy 75-year-old, he says, could live another 15 years and is likely to benefit, while an unhealthy 60-year-old might be too sick to risk the complications. "It's an individual decision based on risk and benefit," Lieberman says.

2. What if I dread the idea? There's no doubt about it: Many people are scared of colonoscopy. Those who haven't had the procedure before usually fear pain. But that's not usually a factor, since patients are almost always sedated. There are two options, says Steven Frank, staff anesthesiologist at Greater Baltimore Medical Center: conscious sedation, during which you can respond to commands but remember very little afterwards, or a deeper sedation that knocks you out entirely, which requires an anesthesia provider's services. Technically, there's a third option: no sedation at all. Some people like the idea of being able to chat with their doctor while being scoped and of being able to drive themselves home; they say the procedure is somewhat uncomfortable but not at all terrible. In Europe, going without sedation is fairly common, but it's probably going to remain a niche market here.

Those who have had a colonoscopy usually come to dread the bowel-cleansing prep more than the procedure itself. There's no way around it, so make sure you do it right the first time so your doctor can complete the procedure and have the best chance of finding lesions, especially the flat ones that can be harder to see.

3. What about the cost? If you aren't covered by insurance and have to pay the cost (which will vary depending on where you live and the provider) out of pocket, you're far less likely to get tested. "Insurance coverage is maybe the biggest predictor of whether an individual is screened," says Durado Brooks, director of prostate and colorectal cancers for the American Cancer Society. (New York City increased its screening rates by funding free or low-cost screenings.) Most insurers cover the procedure—it's required by law in about half the states (of course, you are subject to the usual deductibles, copays, and other rules of your plan). Some insurers have balked at paying for the deeper sedation, which is more expensive because it requires an anesthesia provider. So be sure to ask ahead of time whether there will be an anesthesiologist and, if so, whether insurance will cover it. Make sure he or she is in-network, if your insurer requires that for you to get the fullest reimbursement.

4. How do I pick a doctor? Some recent studies have suggested that colonoscopies aren't as accurate as previously thought at detecting polyps. That's not a reason to avoid one; doctors still say it's the most effective screening test we have for a common cancer (except for the Pap smear, for cervical cancer). It is a reason to make sure you get the best possible care, and that, says Brooks, means tracking your doctor's stats with at least as much attention as you pay to A-Rod's during September.

You want to know how many colonoscopies she performs—experts say at least five a week is a good rule of thumb. She should also be tracking how often she finds a polyp, says Brooks. "In a general screening population, that should be between 15 and 25 percent of the time," he says. You want to know how often she completes a full exam of the colon, as opposed to stopping short of the cecum, or the beginning of the large intestine. (That may depend on whether the bowel prep has been done correctly and complicating digestive conditions, in addition to the doctor's skill.) Anything less than 90 percent of the time is worrisome, Brooks says. Finally, ask how long, on average, she spends withdrawing the scope from the colon. Anything less than about six minutes means the doctor is more likely to miss lesions, he says. Your doctor doesn't know the stats or pooh-poohs your attempts to get them? Find another one.

colan cancer.

could you send me all the things i need to know for a report at school so that i can get an a+++++++ haha well you havemy email so send me the steps thanks my name is josh hahahaha so yeah will you send me the thinghs i need to know about colan cancer that would help alot thank you and have a good day.

josh of WA @ Dec 10, 2009 15:12:04 PM

U.S.A. and Health Insurance

These comments above were great to read. My husband is in need of a free colonoscopy in the State of Maryland. The PAC State of Maryland Insurance using (United Healthcare) for people living off of the state, since they are unemployed, or don't have insurance, or qualify for insurance through Social Services, does not cover anything. My husband had colon cancer back in 2004, and Social Services paid for the operation, and the treatments. Now, in 2008, he can't even get a follow up colonoscopy to make sure that he doesn't have cancer again. It is unfair. He worked hard and paid taxes for over 35+ years. He should qualify to still have insurance through Social Services. If it weren't for the fact that our daughter was not 21 yet, at the time he got colon cancer, he would surely be another fatality of colon cancer victims. The system should be changed so that all people, young and old, should be able to get medical care, no matter what their family circumstances are. The families with babies (under 21), continue to have babies so that they can qualify for Social Services health assistance, cash assistance, food stamps, housing, education, etc. The parents barely worked a day or year in their life, to give something into the system for their retirement, and to help others that are retired or retiring. Wake up America, we all need to get on the pharmacutical industry and the doctors that are charging a lot to keep one alive. Those people have insurance and most, are retired, and live on a fixed income. Most of their paychecks are spent on prescriptions. I had a hernia disc injury last year, and I suffered for 10 months straight (24-7). PAC wouldn't pay for an operation, nor would they pay for a shot to my back to relax the muscle. I thank God that with the 21 day steroid pills, the hot tub, (for free where my daughter works), and walking, the disc settled out, and I was myself once again. Now, my husband needs his colonoscopy, and I need a

mammogram to complete my physical. It is a strain just to find a site on line for free colonoscopy and mammograms. President Obama talked last night (7/22/09) about the change in our health system. What I want, and others like me want, won't happen, because money is involved, and too many politicians are in their own world, trying to obtain money. Just like when a person is placed in jail, The President makes a little money, and so do some of the politicians. The same goes for the health industry. We should make life easier for citizens, just as in Canada, and in a lot of European countries, as well as some asian countries. Maybe, we ought to get more doctors to start using homeopathic medicines, chropractic, and acupunture, at a cost that everyone can afford. A lot of pharmacutical pills don't work on their patients anyway. Why not try something different, that is guaranteed to work. Oh no, that is too right, and the poli's won't make any money. That is what the U.S.A. is about, and that is sad. Thank you.

A Smith of MD @ Jul 23, 2009 16:10:32 PM

U.S.A. and Health Insurance

These comments above were great to read. My husband is in need of a free colonoscopy in the State of Maryland. The PAC State of Maryland Insurance using (United Healthcare) for people living off of the state, since they are unemployed, or don't have insurance, or qualify for insurance through Social Services, does not cover anything. My husband had colon cancer back in 2004, and Social Services paid for the operation, and the treatments. Now, in 2008, he can't even get a follow up colonoscopy to make sure that he doesn't have cancer again. It is unfair. He worked hard and paid taxes for over 35+ years. He should qualify to still have insurance through Social Services. If it weren't for the fact that our daughter was not 21 yet, at the time he got colon cancer, he would surely be another fatality of colon cancer victims. The system should be changed so that all people, young and old, should be able to get medical care, no matter what their family circumstances are. The families with babies (under 21), continue to have babies so that they can qualify for Social Services health assistance, cash assistance, food stamps, housing, education, etc. The parents barely worked a day or year in their life, to give something into the system for their retirement, and to help others that are retired or retiring. Wake up America, we all need to get on the pharmacutical industry and the doctors that are charging a lot to keep one alive. Those people have insurance and most, are retired, and live on a fixed income. Most of their paychecks are spent on prescriptions. I had a hernia disc injury last year, and I suffered for 10 months straight (24-7). PAC wouldn't pay for an operation, nor would they pay for a shot to my back to relax the muscle. I thank God that with the 21 day steroid pills, the hot tub, (for free where my daughter works), and walking, the disc settled out, and I was myself once again. Now, my husband needs his colonoscopy, and I need a

mammogram to complete my physical. It is a strain just to find a site on line for free colonoscopy and mammograms. President Obama talked last night (7/22/09) about the change in our health system. What I want, and others like me want, won't happen, because money is involved, and too many politicians are in their own world, trying to obtain money. Just like when a person is placed in jail, The President makes a little money, and so do some of the politicians. The same goes for the health industry. We should make life easier for citizens, just as in Canada, and in a lot of European countries, as well as some asian countries. Maybe, we ought to get more doctors to start using homeopathic medicines, chropractic, and acupunture, at a cost that everyone can afford. A lot of pharmacutical pills don't work on their patients anyway. Why not try something different, that is guaranteed to work. Oh no, that is too right, and the poli's won't make any money. That is what the U.S.A. is about, and that is sad. Thank you.

of MD @ Jul 23, 2009 16:05:29 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

U.S. News Rankings & Research

Best Hospitals

See the best hospitals, and the best children's hospitals, in specialties from cancer to urology.

Best Health Plans

U.S. News and NCQA review over 700 health insurance plans in the Best Health Plan rankings.

Best Nursing Homes

The Best Nursing Homes rankings feature data on 15,000-plus homes. Search for one near you.

Diseases & Conditions

Get information on preventing, treating, and managing diseases and conditions. Centers:

advertisement

Sponsored Poll

What factor do you think is responsible for the majority of teen-driving crashes?

View Results

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!