Imaging of Low Back Pain Fails to Change Outcomes

Study finds no real difference whether people were scanned or not

Posted: February 6, 2009

FRIDAY, Feb. 6 (HealthDay News) -- Using medical imaging on people who have low back pain that has no apparent underlying cause doesn't improve clinical outcomes, a new study finds.

This means that doctors should not conduct routine MRI, CT or radiography unless they see signs of a serious underlying condition, the authors say.

Dr. Roger Chou, of the Oregon Health & Science University in Portland, and colleagues reviewed the findings of six trials that included more than 1,800 participants. The analysis of a wide range of outcomes -- including pain and functioning, quality of life, mental health, overall improvement and patient satisfaction -- showed no differences between patients who received immediate imaging and those given usual clinical care.

The results apply most strongly to patients with acute or sub-acute low back pain assessed in a family doctor's office, said the study, published this week in The Lancet.

"Rates of utilization of lumbar MRI are increasing, and implementation of diagnostic-imaging guidelines for low back pain remains a challenge," the researchers wrote. "However, clinicians are more likely to adhere to guideline recommendations about lumbar imaging now that these are supported by consistent evidence from higher-quality, randomized, controlled trials."

Patient expectations and preferences also need to be addressed, they said, citing one study of people with low back pain in which 80 percent of the participants said they would have imaging, if given the choice, even without expected benefits.

"We need to identify back-pain assessment and educational strategies that meet patient expectations and increase satisfaction, while avoiding unnecessary imaging," the researchers wrote.

But certain factors may interfere with doctors' attempts to avoid immediate imaging in people with low back pain, Michael M. Kochen, a professor at the University of Göttingen in Germany, and his colleagues wrote in an accompanying editorial.

These roadblocks might include "patients' expectations about diagnostic testing, reimbursement structures providing financial incentives, or the fear of missing relevant pathology."

More information

The U.S. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke has more about low back pain.

The real cost of MRI

Health care costs are obfuscated beyond belief. The list price of an MRI might run $1200 to $2000 depending on locale. The actual cost paid by insurance is in most cases far, far lower. In some cases what is actually paid for an MRI approaches the same cost as what some pay to see a physician. It can be far less than the cost of going to the ER, for example. One 10 million dollar lawsuit for malpractice could pay for 20,000 MRIs.

Cost in medicine is a real problem that cannot even begin to be fixed without greater transparency overall.

Finally, each person has to decide what knowledge is worth. I know too many people who have had delayed or missed diagnoses because their doctor didn't order an imaging study. These people are the reality and so long as they exist, there will not be a one-sided dictum to avoid imaging to cut costs.

Rodrick Williams of MA @ Feb 23, 2009 12:27:43 PM

Differential Diagnosis vs. Correct Diagnosis

This is a ridiculous arguement because it is not based in reality. Economies of scale have already been reached. Every dinky town in America has an MRI machine. Price will not come down enough to implement Mr. William's plan.

If the results of an MRI don't change the treatment plan, it is useless, however, it is a good generator of income for many facilities. When you can get a scan for less than $100 then we can talk. Any first year med student should be able to differentially diagnose acute low back pain and if they can't go see a PT or Chiropractor because they can.

The issue is the patient/client mentality that they need a scan to "know what's going on". Even when they get a scan, many rarely accept the fact that they need to be an active participant in their recovery.

So now you know what the pain generator is, it didn't change the treatment plan, and even then the patient is unwilling to accept the best practice of conservative care because they want the quick fix. Those who are willing to be active in their care typically have very good outcomes and having an MRI didn't make one bit of difference in achieving the outcome.

Clinicians have become too reliant on technology. It is good to have when needed but clearly overused in the US. Is it any wonder we have a healthcare crisis.

Jeff Nasman of WI @ Feb 20, 2009 14:14:20 PM

Differential diagnosis vs. correct diagnosis

MRI can show the condition of a patient's spine. It can demonstrate the more serious contributors to back pain. The technology is great. The flaw really lies with primary care doctors. They are trained to treat differential diagnoses, and focus away from specific ones. That means that what is actually wrong with a patient is less important than know how to manage it. If 9 causes of back pain are treated with conservative therapy and only 1 needs surgery, they would argue that it does not matter which of the nine causes the patient has as long as they don't need surgery.

Direct knowledge of what is wrong is valuable even if it doesn't change the treatment. It is objective, reproducible, and subject to review. A single physician's exam in his or her office doesn't inspire the same confidence. The real solution is to lower the cost of imaging and make it more available.

If we compared going to the doctor for back pain against staying home until it really bothered you, we might find that going to the doctor is fairly useless. If economies of scale lead to MRIs costing less than going to the doctor, then maybe the MRI should be done first. Perhaps then Dr. Chou will publish a very different paper.

Rodrick Williams of MA @ Feb 16, 2009 11:58:51 AM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

U.S. News Rankings & Research

Best Hospitals

See the best hospitals, and the best children's hospitals, in specialties from cancer to urology.

Best Health Plans

U.S. News and NCQA review over 700 health insurance plans in the Best Health Plan rankings.

Best Nursing Homes

The Best Nursing Homes rankings feature data on 15,000-plus homes. Search for one near you.

Diseases & Conditions

Get information on preventing, treating, and managing diseases and conditions. Centers:

advertisement

Sponsored Poll

What factor do you think is responsible for the majority of teen-driving crashes?

View Results

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!