Blacks Fare Worse After Cardiac Arrest

Poor hospital care a big reason why, researchers say

Posted: September 15, 2009

By Steven Reinberg
HealthDay Reporter

TUESDAY, Sept. 15 (HealthDay News) -- Black patients who suffer cardiac arrest in the hospital are much less likely to survive than white patients, a new study finds.

Most of this disparity appears to result from the hospital in which black patients receive care, although other factors play a role as well, the researchers said.

"We know that survival after having a cardiac arrest in the hospital setting has always been historically low," said lead researcher Dr. Paul S. Chan, a cardiologist at St. Luke's Mid-America Heart Institute in Kansas City. "The rate of survival has been about 30 to 33 percent on average."

But the survival rates for blacks were significantly lower, 25 percent vs. 37 percent for whites, Chan said.

"This 12 percent absolute difference in survival is larger than any survival I can think of in terms of a racial disparity, in any other medical condition," he said.

The report is published in the Sept. 16 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.

For the study, Chan and colleagues used data from the National Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation to look at differences in survival among patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest.

They collected information on 10,011 patients, about 19 percent of whom were black, from 274 hospitals. These patients had all been defibrillated after a cardiac arrest.

The lower rates of survival to hospital discharge for blacks reflected lower rates of successful resuscitation (55.8 percent for blacks vs. 67.4 percent for whites) and survival after resuscitation (45.2 percent for blacks vs. 55.5 percent for whites), the researchers noted.

About a third of the difference can be explained by the patients themselves, Chan said, "Black patients were sicker when they had a cardiac arrest than white patients," he said.

Another third of the difference was explained by the hospitals many black patients were in, Chan said.

"This suggests that black patients were having cardiac arrests in hospitals that, on average, did a lot worse, in terms of survival, for all their patients, compared with white patients who went to hospitals that performed better, and patients were more likely to live in those hospitals," he said.

In addition, the quality of care after resuscitating a patient was worse in hospitals treating mostly black patients compared with care in hospitals treating white patients, Chan said.

"The hospital effect is huge and substantial, and is a contributor to the difference between black and white survival," he said. "If we can improve survival in those lower-performing hospitals at which black patients are more likely to be having cardiac arrest, we can eventually narrow the difference between black and white survival."

The remaining difference in survival between blacks and whites could not be explained, Chan said.

There did not seem to be a difference between the treatment blacks and whites received, so racism did not seem to play a role in care between blacks and whites, he said.

"We cannot exclude it fully," Chan said. "But it's really hard to imagine that a physician would treat a black patient differently than a white patient during a cardiac arrest."

Dr. Kim A. Williams, director of nuclear cardiology at the University of Chicago, was surprised that the disparity between blacks and whites wasn't greater.

"I am truly shocked at the results -- only 11 percent less initial resuscitation success," Williams said. "I thought the differential was far greater than this study demonstrates, but I am not surprised that the results are being attributed, at least in part, to the facilities involved rather than just the co-morbidities of the patients.

"Any attempts to improve this egregious disparity must start with the underlying risks and disease differences identified in this study, which would involve pre-morbid education, prevention and screening, and once risks are identified, better access to affordable chronic care and medications," he said. "It's clearly a system problem."

More information

For more information on cardiac arrest, visit the American Heart Association.

Disparity results from futility

This is absolutely not surprising to me. As a palliative care and hospice physician, I know in my practice and in the literature that blacks are far more likely to undergo futile care and demand resuscitation than to elect a DNR (Do Not Resuscitate). The difference in the outcomes can be entirely explained by this fact. Black patients who never had a chance to survive a resuscitation undergo resuscitation more often than white patients because more white patients elect a DNR when the odds of survival are dismal. The white DNR patients are not included in this analysis because they die a peaceful death without resuscitation.

This is not a system problem, nor is it racial disparity. I work hard to educate my black patients about DNR when death is inevitable. Without fail, I have numerous black patients who still demand resuscitation and futile care despite this education. Therefore, the problem lies in blacks' mistrust of the medical system. This article certainly does nothing to ameliorate that mistrust.

Reynold of NC @ Mar 11, 2010 18:46:22 PM

Im a Black Male and here's what I have to say!

You've got to be freakin kiddin me! This is the most BS article I have ever read. Or maybe its not even that the study is bull, perhaps it's how the author of this article misinterpreted the results in order to maintain the image of "white-privilege". This article is an attempt to tarnish the image of black people in terms of health. Im not buying your interpretation of the results of this study. As a psychology graduate with familiarity with research studies, I have to say that the results of this study are being totally misconstrued. Let's take a look. Shall we? There are total of 10,011 patient records observed for the purposes of this study. Out of those 10,011 patients records, 19% of those were black. Let's do the math people! There are only 1,902 black people in this study. This article fails to mention the percentage of white people out of those 10,011 patients who participated in this study. If you are going to compare "whites" to "blacks" then knowing the number of white people who participated is relevant! Let's move on and break down the results of this study properly. Shall we? The article reads that 54.8% of those black patients were sucessfully resuscitated. Remember the magic number of 1,902 black people?; 54.8% of 1,902 black patients, is a total of 1,042 black patients who were sucessfully resuscitated. Out of those 1,042 black patients whom were suscessfully resuscitated, 45.2% survived to discharge from the hospital. Let's see, 45.2% of the total number of black patients is 860 people whom survived. We now need the number of white patients whom participated in order to make a comparison. The study reflects that our white counterparts were suscessfully resuscitated at a rate of 67.4%. Moreover, the study reflects that out of the total number of white patients, a number we do not know, 55.5% survived. There could have been 7000 white patients for godsake or perhaps even more. Which would mean thousands of white patients were sucessfully resuscitated to survive to discharge from the hospital. And Dr. Kim A. Williams, I am just shocked that you did not catch this misinterpretation. You state "I am truly shocked at the results -- only 11 percent less initial resuscitation success...I thought the differential was far greater than this study demonstrates..." Dr. Williams, you can not know what the study "demonstrates" without knowing the total number of white people who have participated. Understood?

Samuel of NY @ Sep 19, 2009 10:02:42 AM

racism in medicine

I believe this because African

Americans have to pay more for health care and the care we receive is poor from the start this is so sad but true i do not think racism is over just well hidden

muffy of IL @ Sep 18, 2009 12:21:17 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

U.S. News Rankings & Research

U.S. News's "America's Best" delivers recognized, authoritative information and clear, objective rankings that help readers plan for their life and ultimately, make the most of it.

advertisement

Sponsored Poll

What factor do you think is responsible for the majority of teen-driving crashes?

View Results

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!