New Device Treats Common Heart Rhythm Disorder

It could replace anti-clotting drug warfarin for many patients, researchers say

Posted: March 28, 2009

By Steven Reinberg
HealthDay Reporter

SATURDAY, March 28 (HealthDay News) -- An implanted device may soon replace the anti-clotting drug warfarin as the first line of treatment for many people with atrial fibrillation, a new study suggests.

People with atrial fibrillation have a sixfold increased risk of stroke, the researchers noted, and typically need to take warfarin for the rest of their lives. Atrial fibrillation is a common heart rhythm problem that causes the upper chamber of the heart to beat irregularly.

"One in four people over 50 will develop atrial fibrillation," lead researcher Dr. David R. Holmes Jr., the Scripps Professor of Medicine at the Mayo Graduate School of Medicine, said during a morning teleconference at the American College of Cardiology annual meeting Saturday in Orlando, Fla.

About 3 million people in the United States have atrial fibrillation, and 16 million Americans will have the condition by 2050, Holmes said. Stroke is the most serious complication related to atrial fibrillation, he noted.

"We know that in those patients with atrial fibrillation that the clot that causes that stroke comes from a certain area of the heart called the left atrial appendage," Holmes said, explaining that the appendage is a muscular pouch connected to the left atrium. "The device isolates the left atrial appendage."

To implant the device, an interventional cardiologist uses a catheter inserted in a leg vein to guide the device into the heart; the device travels through the heart's right chamber and is deposited into the left atrium through a puncture hole between the two chambers of the heart, the researchers explained.

Current treatment with warfarin is effective in preventing strokes caused by clots associated with atrial fibrillation, but its use needs to be monitored monthly to assure patients are receiving the safest and most effective dose because it can cause serious bleeding if given in doses that are too high, Holmes noted.

In the Embolic Protection in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation (PROTECT AF) trial, researchers compared treatment with warfarin to a fabric-covered, expandable cage called the WATCHMAN. The device blocks blood clots that typically form in the heart's left atrial appendage. The 707 patients were randomly assigned to one of the two treatments.

"Efficacy was dramatically better with the device, and stopping the warfarin," Holmes said.

The researchers found that patients with the WATCHMAN had a 32 percent lower risk of stroke and cardiovascular death compared with warfarin therapy. This was especially true for hemorrhagic stroke, which causes bleeding in the brain and is usually fatal, Holmes noted.

In addition, there were fewer complications with the device, once it was implanted, compared to warfarin. Most complications with the device occurred when placing it in the heart, but these complications now occur in only 1 percent of patients, Holmes noted.

The researchers concluded that the device is an effective alternative to warfarin for preventing stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation, particularly those at the highest risk of stroke.

"A strategy like this can be used in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation to prevent stroke, and get them off warfarin," Holmes said.

Dr. Gregg C. Fonarow, professor of cardiology at the University of California, Los Angeles, thinks this device will benefit many patients with atrial fibrillation.

"The major risk of atrial fibrillation is blood clots forming in the heart, and then breaking loose to cause stroke. Most of these blood clots form in the appendage of the left atrium," Fonarow said.

The only effective treatment until now was lifelong use of warfarin. Researchers have been searching for alternative therapies to warfarin to protect patients with atrial fibrillation from stroke without success for decades, Fonarow noted.

"The findings from this clinical trial are very impressive," Fonarow said. "Although there were some procedure-related complications, treatment with this novel device will be very attractive and provide patients with atrial fibrillation effective, long-term protection from stroke and systemic embolization without the bleeding risks associated with warfarin."

Re Atritech's Watchman - Let the Patient Beware

I have a Watchman device in my left atrial appendage that has moved twice and now projects into the left atrial lumen from where it threatens the mitral valve and the atrial wall itself. I am scheduled for serious on-pump open heart surgery to remove this faulty equipment. I was never warned that this might be such a risk – other than the meaningless mumbo-jumbo “informed consent” statements put on everything medical. There are others also unreported and I encourage them to come forward. This is a high-risk process and not to be entered into lightly. In the meantime, two atrial ablations have cleared up my arrhythmia - so the Watchman with its trailing razor-sharp barbs are poised to slice open my heart, destroy my mitral valve and cut open any artery it can get into – for no purpose at all. One patient's device got "lost" and was found in her abdominal aorta. Go figure.

Nigel Grant, Solicitor, England & Wales; Attorney at Law, California.

Nigel Grant of FL @ Aug 29, 2009 17:09:13 PM

Watchman Device

I watch my diet and yet the pro-time will at times get out of hand causing me to have a weekly check .

If I recall correctly This device as stated in the article was evaluated with 10.000 patients in Europe, That seems to me as a fairly good sampling of the device and/or any problems associated with it .

I would be happy to eliminate the Warfarin and also wonder about the life time cost of Warfarin as opposed to the cost of this device of course the side effects etc., of Warfarin also have an intrinsick value .

I also have a balance problem and have fallen several times which would also be an insentive to use Watchman.

Good Article - Thank You

Mr. Favor of OR @ Mar 28, 2009 20:33:28 PM

look who is talking

The study is published by the makers of the device and there is no call mortality figure on this. Once placed this device stays there and if issues, tough luck even long term results will show complications. I would never put myself or my family through such treatments.I will wait until until more people had this done and results look good. One thing my family learnt is never jump on the band wagon for new stuff when there are proven treatments available. Remember VIOXX, AVANDIA disasters.

ray of CA @ Mar 28, 2009 16:35:33 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

U.S. News Rankings & Research

Best Hospitals

See the best hospitals, and the best children's hospitals, in specialties from cancer to urology.

Best Health Plans

U.S. News and NCQA review over 700 health insurance plans in the Best Health Plan rankings.

Best Nursing Homes

The Best Nursing Homes rankings feature data on 15,000-plus homes. Search for one near you.

Diseases & Conditions

Get information on preventing, treating, and managing diseases and conditions. Centers:

advertisement

Sponsored Poll

What factor do you think is responsible for the majority of teen-driving crashes?

View Results

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!