For Some Kidney Patients, Home Dialysis Is Better

Evidence suggests nighttime treatment yields better results

Posted: July 25, 2009

By Karen Pallarito
HealthDay Reporter

SATURDAY, July 25 (HealthDay News) -- More than 340,000 Americans are on dialysis to treat kidney failure, but only a tiny fraction are taking advantage of a treatment option that may improve their quality of life.

Studies suggest that home hemodialysis administered overnight, otherwise known as "nocturnal dialysis," may be a better way to go for some patients. The key advantage is it allows for many more hours of blood-cleansing therapy than a kidney patient would typically receive in a conventional, three-times-a-week dialysis center-based program.

"If I had kidney failure, and I think this applies to at least a number of physicians who know what all this is about, what we would do is we would do overnight dialysis six nights a week," said Dr. Christopher R. Blagg, professor emeritus of medicine at the University of Washington and executive director emeritus of Northwest Kidney Centers in Seattle.

Hemodialysis is one of two main types of dialysis treatment administered when a person's kidneys are no longer functioning. It uses a machine to remove wastes and excess fluid from the blood. (Peritoneal dialysis, by contrast, uses the lining of the patient's own abdomen as a filtering device.)

When home hemodialysis is performed overnight, the patient sleeps while the machine does its work. Treatment usually takes place six days a week or every other night over a six- to eight-hour stretch, says the National Kidney Foundation.

Experts say it's not for everyone, particularly people with other serious medical problems, such as cardiovascular disease. But science is beginning to show that nocturnal dialysis has significant advantages.

In a study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, researchers randomly assigned 52 patients to receive either frequent nocturnal hemodialysis, meaning five or six days a week for a minimum of six hours, or conventional hemodialysis treatments three times weekly. Patients in the nighttime portion of the study were trained to perform hemodialysis at home.

After six months, those receiving nighttime treatments had better heart health, blood pressure and some measures of quality of life than those in conventional treatment.

And Turkish researchers found that eight-hour nighttime treatments performed three times a week cut the death risk of patients by 80 percent compared with conventional four-hour treatments done three times a week. The findings were presented at last year's annual meeting of the American Society of Nephrology.

Dr. Michael V. Rocco, a professor of internal medicine-nephrology at Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center in Winston-Salem, N.C., says doctors may know more about the effects of more frequent dialysis in the next few years as a result of two National Institutes of Health-sponsored clinical trials.

In one study, patients will receive treatment at a dialysis center on a conventional, three-times-a-week basis or on a frequent, six-times-a-week schedule. The other study will compare nocturnal hemodialysis administered six times a week for at least six hours with conventional, three-times-a-week home hemodialysis.

"These studies on daily and nocturnal [hemodialysis] will provide us with far more dependable information than we now have with observational studies alone," Rocco said.

At present, fewer than 1 percent of all U.S. dialysis patients -- roughly 3,000 people -- do home hemodialysis, Blagg noted.

Several factors are contributing to the lack of growth in nocturnal hemodialysis in the United States, Rocco noted. These include a lack of training in home hemodialysis, especially nocturnal dialysis, making physicians reluctant to recommend it to patients. Funding for home hemodialysis training is inadequate, and physicians and staff aren't promoting it, he added.

But Congress passed legislation last year that could influence the popularity of that option. Effective Jan. 1, 2010, patients with chronic kidney disease must be counseled about their treatment options. This provision is intended to give patients an opportunity to participate in choosing the therapy that they receive.

Nocturnal Dialysis Prolongs Life

I’ve done every variety of hemodialysis: thrice weekly conventional dialysis in-center; thrice weekly nocturnal in-center; short daily at home six days per week; and nocturnal at home six days per week. By far the best treatment I have received is nocturnal at home.

Other than the obvious benefits of having my entire day back, I am living a healthier and more purposeful life. Nocturnal dialysis because of the more gentle treatment due to the slower rate and the additional time to eliminate excess fluid has allowed my heart to get stronger since changing from short to long treatments. The author obviously talked to the wrong “experts” when she stated it’s not for people who have cardiovascular disease. It absolutely is for those people. I know. I had a heart attack driving home from an in-center treatment. One cannot imagine the stress a conventional treatment has on one’s heart, especially after the three-day weekend. When I first started dialysis, it wasn’t unusual for me to take off 13 pounds between treatments. That figure was reduced as time went on, but one can only imagine the stress upon one’s heart those fluctuations cause every two or three days.

It’s great the NIH will be sponsoring a clinical trial on more frequent dialysis, but if it’s to be a randomized grouping, there is no way I would ever participate. I would never take the chance of going back in-center or reducing my frequency at home. That would be paramount to me signing my own death sentence. The evidence is in. Studies have been performed in other countries. They should be good enough for us. And as far as I’m concerned, observational evidence should be sufficient. Tale me and all of the others who are doing more frequent dialysis and compare our current outcomes to those of when we dialyzed less. The scientific evidence would quickly become apparent. If one wants to analyze data, one does not have to look any further to the mortality rates and the quality of life in the U.S. of conventional dialyzors. It’s no wonder the U.S. ranks last of the industrialized countries of the world regarding dialysis outcomes.

Many say the U’S has the best healthcare system in the world. If so, it’s time for it to lead in dialysis. I’m one of the lucky ones, and I want to stay that way. I’m tired of hearing more frequent dialysis isn’t for everybody. It should be “less frequent dialysis isn’t for everybody”.

Rich Berkowitz of IL @ Jul 27, 2009 11:39:17 AM

Author contradicts herself

You would think that a reporter might notice that these two statements:

"Experts say it's not for everyone, particularly people with other serious medical problems, such as cardiovascular disease" and "After six months, those receiving nighttime treatments had better heart health, blood pressure and some measures of quality of life than those in conventional treatment" don't go together.

The other commenters are right--nocturnal HD should be the FIRST choice when these sorts of problems are present (as they all too often are), and in cases where people would like to have a life--and they need dialysis.

For more information about peritoneal dialysis, as well as daily and nocturnal hemodialysis (in-center and at home), visit Home Dialysis Central, at http://www.homedialysis.org.

Dori Schatell of WI @ Jul 27, 2009 09:31:15 AM

I give it a B; it could have been an A

The article does a good job backing most statements with references to current research. However, starting with the title it is clear that the writers at US News aren't completely sold on the nocturnal option.

"For Some Kidney Patients ..." why just for some? In the article they claim in regard to nocturnal home hemodialysis:

"Experts say it's not for everyone, particularly people with other serious medical problems, such as cardiovascular disease."

What experts say that? What study showed that?

If anything frequent nocturnal home hemodialysis should be the first choice of people with cardiovascular disease and CKD5. One of the ways nocturnal hemodialysis is healthier is that is let's you remove fluid slowly, this combined with higher frequencies makes the modality the most heart friendly form of dialysis. With frequent nocturnal hemodialysis fluid buildup/rapid removal does not routinely strain the heart, which can happen with conventional dialysis. Change that sentence to "Experts say it is for everyone, particularly people with other serious medical problems, such as cardiovascular disease" and you would have an A+ article.

Bill Peckham of WA @ Jul 26, 2009 22:10:28 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

U.S. News Rankings & Research

Best Hospitals

See the best hospitals, and the best children's hospitals, in specialties from cancer to urology.

Best Health Plans

U.S. News and NCQA review over 700 health insurance plans in the Best Health Plan rankings.

Best Nursing Homes

The Best Nursing Homes rankings feature data on 15,000-plus homes. Search for one near you.

Diseases & Conditions

Get information on preventing, treating, and managing diseases and conditions. Centers:

advertisement

Sponsored Poll

What factor do you think is responsible for the majority of teen-driving crashes?

View Results

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!