Mammography: What to Do Now?

Three doctors weigh in on what women should do about the new guidelines

Posted: November 18, 2009

By Kathleen Doheny
HealthDay Reporter

WEDNESDAY, Nov. 18 (HealthDay News) -- When a U.S. government task force recommended that women wait until they're 50 to get their first mammogram to check for breast cancer, reaction was swift.

Critics such as the American Cancer Society vowed to stand by its advice that annual screening begin at age 40 for women of average risk. The American College of Radiology agreed.

But what will doctors who see female patients day after day suggest they do?

The guidelines, released Nov. 16 by a federal panel of experts known as the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, recommend that women aged 40 to 49 and at average risk for breast cancer talk to their doctor about when it would be best for them to begin mammography screening. Those aged 50 to 74 should have every-other-year screenings, rather than an annual mammogram, according to the new guidelines. As for women aged 75 and older, the task force concluded that there is not enough evidence to assess the benefits and harms of the test.

Whether they agree or disagree with the guidelines, experts seem to agree that women should talk to their health-care providers for guidance based on their individual medical history and other factors.

Three such providers -- an internist, a family physician and a gynecologist -- weigh in on what they will advise their patients to do.

An Internist's View

"The evidence supports the recommendation," said Dr. Karla Kerlikowske, director of the Women Veteran's Comprehensive Health Center at the San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, who wrote an editorial accompanying publication of the guidelines in the Annals of Internal Medicine.

"I think for women 40 to 49, we should target women who are at high risk," she said, such as those with a first-degree relative with breast cancer.

Changing the screening interval from annually to every two years for women 50 to 74, she said, "is one of the best things they did." At her clinic, Kerlikowske said, biennial screening has been a standard for years.

A Gynecologist's View

Gynecologist Judi Chervenak, an associate clinical professor of obstetrics-gynecology and women's health at Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York City, said she will tell her patients this: "From age 39 on, a woman should have a yearly visit to her health-care provider, during which she discusses which routine tests are appropriate for her, including mammography."

But, she also said she favors mammography for many women.

"Unless the patient is at increased risk of radiation exposure or increased mental health stress of dealing with a false-positive test, I still feel that the use of the mammogram is a potentially lifesaving and quality-of-life improving test for many women," Chervenak said.

"We know that mammography often picks up a cancer before it can be palpated," she said. "We have to do everything we can to maintain our quality of life."

A Family Physician's View

A woman should remember that the guidelines are based on the entire population and that her own decision must be an individual one, said Dr. David Baron, a family physician and chief of staff at Santa Monica-UCLA Medical Center and Orthopaedic Hospital in Santa Monica, Calif., and an assistant clinical professor of family medicine at the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles.

"That's why communication between a patient and her health-care professional is very important," Baron said.

The new guidelines, in his view, are encouraging physicians to individualize the screenings.

"Some of this will depend on how risk-adverse a woman is," Baron said. A 40-year-old woman, for instance, might be afraid of radiation from a mammogram and be at average risk for breast cancer. No matter how much a doctor explains that the radiation amount is minimal, he said, she might not be convinced, and she might be advised to wait.

On the other hand, he said, another 40-year-old woman might be very frightened of breast cancer and want the screening. For her, Baron said, he might advise sticking with annual screening.

mammographer's point of view

Coming from the medical point of view...as a current mammographer...I think these new guidelines will put women in harms way. The single most risk factor for having breast cancer is that we have BREASTS.

This week alone I have recieved pathology findings on 7 women with invasive ductal carcinomas. 5 out of these 7 women were referred for an annual screening exam (not having symptoms at the time of their exam). While I'm not sure how they will do with treatment and of the estimated survival rates...I wonder what their outcomes would be if these patients would have waited for another year before screening (most likely worse than when they were diagnosed)

We as women should not let a simple body structure such as a breast take out livelyhoods away. Mammograhy is a relatively inexpensive exam that takes only a few minutes and I definately have seen it make a difference in womens lives

michelel of CA @ Nov 18, 2009 19:57:35 PM

Uninformed comments

Did any of you stating that these recommendations were made by a panel of men actually bother to find out more about the Preventive Service Task Force? Clearly, you didn't. Otherwise, you would know that 8 of the 16 members are women. A few recommendations of my own:

1. Quit playing the blame game.

2. The Preventive Service Task Force is not some overnight creation serving as a pawn for the government; the Task Force has been operating since 1984.

3. Mammography, like other screening tests, has risks and benefits. The benefits are more evident with increasing age.

4. Consider that these recommendations are intended for optimal population health, not individual health, which is why the recommendations include a caveat regarding pre-existing risk factors.

5. Learn the risk factors for breast cancer, which will ultimately facilitate discussions with your physician about an appropriate screening frequency tailored to your needs.

6. Quit being so afraid of science.

Reason of ND @ Nov 18, 2009 18:46:53 PM

Mammograms

After years of pounding into women that you must get your annual mammogram starting at 40 and the fact that lifes have been saved because of this practice, we are now chainging this. I am a breast cancer survivor that was diagnosed in my 40s. Mammography saves lifes. It is a medical fact that most women who get breast cancer are not in a recognized risk factor category. I could cry that this committee is so stupid and did not even include an oncologist. Women, please insist on a screening memmogram starting at 40.

Roxanne Fowler of AZ @ Nov 18, 2009 14:28:43 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

U.S. News Rankings & Research

Best Hospitals

See the best hospitals, and the best children's hospitals, in specialties from cancer to urology.

Best Health Plans

U.S. News and NCQA review over 700 health insurance plans in the Best Health Plan rankings.

Best Nursing Homes

The Best Nursing Homes rankings feature data on 15,000-plus homes. Search for one near you.

Diseases & Conditions

Get information on preventing, treating, and managing diseases and conditions. Centers:

advertisement

Sponsored Poll

What factor do you think is responsible for the majority of teen-driving crashes?

View Results

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!