Progress in Stamping Out Smoking Has Stalled

1 in 5 Americans still smoke, CDC says, and numbers haven't moved in last 5 years

Posted: November 12, 2009

By Steven Reinberg
HealthDay Reporter

THURSDAY, Nov. 12 (HealthDay News) -- After decades of progress, the number of Americans who smoke hasn't budged over the last five years and actually rose slightly from 2007 to 2008, according to a new report from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Over the longer term, smoking rates have declined. From 1998 to 2008, the percentage of smokers in the United States dropped from 24.1 to 20.6 percent.

However, the report notes that "during the past five years, rates have shown virtually no change," and in fact the percentage of Americans who smoke has begun to creep up again, rising from 19.8 percent in 2007 to 20.6 percent in 2008.

Many experts blame the turnaround on recent cutbacks in funding for state tobacco-control programs, which had proven successful.

"Tobacco is the leading cause of preventable death in the U.S., and we know what to do," said Dr. Thomas Frieden, the CDC director. "We want to provide support to states and localities to implement proven programs, and if we do that, we can save literally millions of lives in the decades to come."

The report is published in the Nov. 13 edition of the CDC's Morbidity and Morality Weekly Report, and arrives just before the American Cancer Society's annual quit-smoking day, the Great American Smokeout, set for Nov. 19.

According to the report, from 2007 to 2008 the number of Americans who smoked remained constant, at about 46 million. Smokers were more likely to be male (23.1 percent) than female (18.3 percent).

The majority of smokers are people who did not graduate from high school, and the lowest rates are among those with a college graduate degree, the report found.

Asian Americans had the lowest smoking rates (9.9 percent), and American Indians and Alaskan Natives had the highest (32.4 percent), the researchers found.

The CDC investigators place much of the blame for the stagnation in smoking rates on states' underfunding of their tobacco-control programs. They point out that from 2000 to 2009, states have received $203.5 billion in tobacco-related revenue. However, less than 3 percent of the funds have been earmarked for tobacco-prevention and smoking-cessation programs in the states, according to the report.

The researchers added that if states were to use just 15 percent of the money they receive from tobacco, they could adequately finance tobacco-control measures at CDC-recommended levels. However, in 2009, no state funds its program to that level, according to the agency.

Frieden noted that in states where tobacco-control programs are supported, "we continue to see a substantial decline" in smoking rates.

"In contrast, too few states are making that kind of progress," he said. "And we are seeing reductions on the spending on tobacco control, despite the fact that we take in, as a country, $25 billion from the Master Settlement Agreement and tobacco taxes. We spend only about 3 percent of that on tobacco control."

Another report in the same issue of the CDC's weekly report examined people's exposure to secondhand smoke, looking at data from 11 states and the U.S. Virgin Islands.

Exposure to secondhand smoke in homes ranged from 3.2 percent in Arizona to 10.6 percent in West Virginia, researchers found. At work, exposure ranged from 6 percent in Tennessee to 17.3 percent in the U.S. Virgin Islands.

In West Virginia, 68.8 percent of the people said they do not allow smoking in their home, as did 85.7 percent of those living in the U.S. Virgin Islands.

"Still, half the people in this country are not protected by comprehensive smoke-free laws," Frieden noted.

The CDC maintains that passing more smoke-free laws and encouraging people not to smoke at home could go a long way toward reducing the danger to nonsmokers from secondhand smoke.

On the plus side, Frieden noted that in 2009, the federal tobacco tax was raised and some states are also raising their tobacco tax. "We know that those increases make a big difference," he said.

In addition, more places are becoming smoke-free, he said. "Going smoke-free not only protects the health of nonsmokers but also encourages smokers to quit," Freiden said.

Under a rock? HERE IS THE TRUTH

The EPA's 1993 report on second hand smoke claimed that it had found that ETS (Environmental Tobacco Smoke) was a Class A Carcinogen. A Congressional inquiry into the EPA was instigated in 1994

Among its conclusions was the statement:

"The process at every turn has been characterized by both scientific and procedural irregularities. Those irregularities include conflicts of interest by both Agency staff involved in the preparation of the risk assessment and members of the Science Advisory Board panel selected to provide a supposedly independent evaluation of the document."

In court Judge Osteen (anti-smoking) overturned that ETS was proven to be a Class A Carcinogen. saying:

"The Agency disregarded information and made findings based on selective information... deviated from its own risk assessment guidelines; failed to disclose important findings and reasoning; and left significant questions without answers... Gathering all relevant information, researching and disseminating findings were subordinate to EPA's demonstrating ETS was a Group A carcinogen... In this case, EPA publicly committed to a conclusion before research had begun; adjusted established procedure and scientific norms to validate the Agency's public conclusion, and aggressively utilized the Act's authority to disseminate findings to establish a de facto regulatory scheme... and to influence public opinion... While so doing, produced limited evidence, then claimed the weight of the Agency's research evidence demonstrated ETS causes cancer."

The US Congressional Research Service conducted a study as well (Environmental Tobacco Smoke And Lung Cancer Risk," CRS, Nov. 14, 1995) and stated:

"The statistical evidence does not appear to support a conclusion that there are substantial health effects of passive smoking.... Even at the greatest exposure levels....very few or even no deaths can be attributed to ETS."

A US Department of Energy Report, found serious and telling flaws in EPA's methodology, and went on to demolish the underlying studies, even quoting EPA's prior critiques of the same studies!

The International Agency on Research on Cancer (IARC) conducted a 10 year study in 7 countries and concluded that living with or working with a smoker presented no statistically significant risk for non-smokers.

The National Cancer Institute study (Brownson et al, 1992) found opposing findings to the EPA report as well

In 2003 the American Cancer Society's Cancer Prevention Study (CPS1) confirmed the findings of the study by IARC.

This study followed 35,561 nonsmokers married to smokers for 39 years. It showed no increase in lung cancer.

In 1981 and 1988, the American Cancer Society did two major US studies (CPS-1 and CPS-2) and found no connection between smoking and heart disease.

A 10 year, 21-country study, conducted by the World Heath Organization , reported no link between heart disease and first or second hand smoke.

get out from under your own rock you fascist.

Baccybeast of TX @ Feb 05, 2010 06:16:27 AM

wow

Smoking isn't harmful? Secondhand smoke isn't harmful? Wow. Under what rock are most of you living? Take the tinfoil off your heads. The government shouldn't participate in activities to prevent health hazards? Well, clearly, the manufacturers of tobacco aren't going to do this for us - and as far as the "big lie" - did you listen to the lies you were told by big tobacco? As far as the "rights" of people to pollute the air I breathe - give it a rest, Thomas. Until every tobacco user pays for every single health and mortality cost associated with their habit, then I'll stop fighting for my rights and the rights of nonsmokers.

JC of ID @ Nov 19, 2009 15:34:47 PM

spelling

That's "Morbidity and Mortality" - not "morality

JC of ID @ Nov 19, 2009 15:24:07 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

U.S. News Rankings & Research

Best Hospitals

See the best hospitals, and the best children's hospitals, in specialties from cancer to urology.

Best Health Plans

U.S. News and NCQA review over 700 health insurance plans in the Best Health Plan rankings.

Best Nursing Homes

The Best Nursing Homes rankings feature data on 15,000-plus homes. Search for one near you.

Diseases & Conditions

Get information on preventing, treating, and managing diseases and conditions. Centers:

advertisement

Sponsored Poll

What factor do you think is responsible for the majority of teen-driving crashes?

View Results

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!