Experts Call for FDA Regulation of Tobacco Products

2-year project also urges higher cigarette taxes, more oversight of advertising claims

Posted: February 25, 2009

WEDNESDAY, Feb. 25 (HealthDay News) -- All tobacco products in the United States should be regulated by the federal government, according to a report released Wednesday by a panel of 26 of the nation's leading tobacco control researchers and policy experts.

"Bold thinking is required to reverse the catastrophic projections for tobacco-caused deaths in this century," panel co-chair Mitchell Zeller, a health policy expert with Pinney Associates and a former associate commissioner of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, said in a University of Minnesota news release.

During a two-year process called The Strategic Dialogue on Tobacco Harm Reduction, the experts developed recommendations on ways to regulate tobacco products based on public health needs, as well as ways to help tobacco users who are unable or unwilling to quit to switch to the least harmful nicotine products.

The group recommended:

The recommendations appear online in the journal Tobacco Control.

Under what they called the "continuum of risk," the experts also noted that cigarettes are the most dangerous tobacco product and that medicinal nicotine products, such as nicotine gum and patches, are less harmful than oral tobacco products.

Smoking remains the leading cause of preventable disease and death in the United States and costs the nation nearly $200 billion a year. This year, nearly 440,000 people in the United States will die from tobacco-related illnesses. This century, an estimated 1 billion people worldwide will die prematurely from tobacco use -- a 10-fold increase over the 20th century -- if current trends continue.

"Our report is a blueprint," Dialogue chair Dorothy Hatsukami, director of the University of Minnesota's Tobacco Use Research Center and Masonic Cancer Center's Cancer Control and Prevention Programs, said in a university news release. "It lays out the key elements of a science-based regulatory program and policies to shift current tobacco users away from cigarettes. With these policies and programs, we believe that the death toll from cigarette smoking and other tobacco use can be reduced dramatically."

"Simply put, there is no 'one size fits all' method to quit or reduce smoking," Zeller added. "The public health community has failed to provide appropriate guidelines on all the evidence-based methods available so that smokers concerned about their health but who find themselves unable or unwilling to quit have options on how to quit smoking successfully."

More information

The American Cancer Society offers a guide for quitting smoking.

ANY tobacco use is harmful and should be avoided!

Smokeless tobacco might be "far less hazardous than cigarettes", but let's be careful in putting out unqualified statements like "cigarettes are 100 times deadlier than smokeless tobacco products."

It is indisputably true that nicotine replacement products (patches, gums and lozenges) are safe, nearly risk-free, well regulated (FDA), and proven tobacco cessation choices, especially when used in combination with a proven counseling or readily available quitline services.

Some want everyone in the world to believe that switching from cigarettes to smokeless tobacco products “reduces tobacco health risks nearly as much as by quitting all tobacco/nicotine.” Smokeless does not mean harmless by any means.

The use of smokeless and spitless (IE- snus) tobacco is scientifically proven to cause significant bodily harm, such as elevation of pulse and blood pressure, dental and gum disease, and oral, gastric, and pancreatic cancers.

According to the International Agency for Research on Cancer (July, 2008), use of snus raises the user’s risk of oral cancer by 80 percent and the risk of esophageal and pancreatic cancer by 60 percent. Several recent independent research studies on snus tobacco products currently being sold in the United States show them to contain high levels of nicotine and carcinogens, thus they are highly addictive and pose significant health implications.

Other public health issues remain regarding spitless tobacco and snus. 1) they may be viewed as a safe alternative to smoking; 2) they very well are a gateway to cigarette and other tobacco use by youth; 3) many smokers will adopt the use of snus or snuff when they cannot or prefer not to smoke, and thus become dual addicted; 4) users will become addicted to an additional tobacco product with confirmed and significant health risks; and 5) smokers will use snus as a means of smoking cessation, only to find that they are not able to quit snus.

“Tobacco harm reduction” should continue to be viewed as strategy of the tobacco industry designed to enlist the support of public health practitioners and advocates. Specifically, they want the public health community help them to increase their tobacco sales by endorsing new forms of tobacco.

While tobacco companies manufacturing snus and a marginal few in public health claim that considerable public health improvement can be attained by this alternative to smoking, the long-term health implications of snus use have not been established. Moreover, the tobacco industry has no credibility when it comes to health matters.

This just released report on a "Strategic Dialogue on Tobacco Harm Reduction" loudly calls for regulation of harmful compounds in all tobacco products and regulation of all aspects of tobacco promotion, advertising and labeling.

Anyone who has not been with their head in the stuck in the sand the past few decades understands that ALL TOBACCO PRODUCTS ARE HARMFUL AND SHOULD BE AVOIDED!

Bruce Adkins, M.S., PA of WV @ Feb 28, 2009 14:02:01 PM

Smokeless tobacco far less hazardous than cigarettes

Considering that many of the panel's 26 members work for organizations/agencies that have been and continue misleading the public to believe that smokeless tobacco products are just as hazardous as cigarettes, this report is a step forward.

While most smokeless tobacco products are as addictive as cigarettes, cigarettes are 100 times deadlier than smokeless tobacco products (and nicotine gums and lozenges are even less hazardous alternatives).

Switching from cigarettes to smokeless tobacco products reduces tobacco health risks nearly as much as by quitting all tobacco/nicotine, and smokeless tobacco products pose no health risks to others since they don't emit tobacco smoke pollution.

Millions of male smokers in the US, and hundreds of thousands in Sweden, have sharply reduced their health risks by switching to smokeless tobacco alternatives. And many smokers have reduced their health risks by using smokeless tobacco products as an alternative to cigarettes, as every dose of nicotine obtained from a smokeless product would otherwise be obtained by inhaling cigarette smoke.

It also should be noted that Mitch Zeller has been funded by GlaxoSmithKline (marketer of nicotine gum, lozenges and patches), via Pinney Associates, to oppose smokeless tobacco products (which compete against GSK nicotine products, and which pose just slightly greater health risks than GSK nicotine products) and to lobby for FDA tobacco legislation that was negotiated and agreed to by Philip Morris that protects Marlboro's cigarette empire from market competition by far less hazardous smokeless tobacco products.

If the panel members truly desire to accurately inform the public about the continuum of risk of different tobacco and nicotine products (as this report claims), they should start by urging their own organizations/agencies to change their policies/websites/brochures and begin to truthfully inform the public about these risks.

The panel members should also urge members of Congress to amend the Philip Morris backed FDA tobacco legislation so that it truthfully informs the public about the continuum of risk of tobacco/nicotine products, and so that it allows smokeless tobacco products to effectively compete against far more hazardous cigarettes.

Bill Godshall

Executive Director

Smokefree Pennsylvania

1926 Monongahela Avenue

Pittsburgh, PA 15218

Bill Godshall of PA @ Feb 26, 2009 13:44:00 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

U.S. News Rankings & Research

Best Hospitals

See the best hospitals, and the best children's hospitals, in specialties from cancer to urology.

Best Health Plans

U.S. News and NCQA review over 700 health insurance plans in the Best Health Plan rankings.

Best Nursing Homes

The Best Nursing Homes rankings feature data on 15,000-plus homes. Search for one near you.

Diseases & Conditions

Get information on preventing, treating, and managing diseases and conditions. Centers:

advertisement

Sponsored Poll

What factor do you think is responsible for the majority of teen-driving crashes?

View Results

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!