Early Spankings Make for Aggressive Toddlers, Study Shows

Kids spanked at age 1 also had worse performance on cognitive tests at age 3

Posted: September 15, 2009

By Jennifer Thomas
HealthDay Reporter

TUESDAY, Sept. 15 (HealthDay News) -- Children who are spanked as 1-year-olds are more likely to behave aggressively and perform worse on cognitive tests as toddlers than children who are spared the punishment, new research shows.

Though the negative effects of spanking were "modest," the study adds to a growing body of literature that's finding spanking isn't good for children.

"Age 1 is a key time for establishing the quality of the parenting and the relationship between parent and the child," said study author Lisa J. Berlin, a research scientist at the Center for Child and Family Policy at Duke University. "Spanking at age 1 reflects a negative dynamic, and increases children's aggression at age 2."

The study is published in the September/October issue of Child Development.

Berlin and her colleagues looked at data on 2,500 white, Mexican American and black children from low-income families. The data included parents' reports about their children's behavior, their use of spanking, as well as home visits by trained observers to document parent-child interactions at ages 1, 2 and 3.

About one-third of mothers of 1-year-olds reported they or someone in their household had spanked their child in the last week, while about half of the mothers of 2- and 3-year-olds reported that their child had been spanked.

The average number of spankings for 1-year-olds was 2.6 per week, while the average for 2-year-olds was nearly three.

The study found that children who were spanked at age 1 had more aggressive behaviors at age 2 and performed worse on measures of thinking abilities at age 3.

Being spanked at age 2, however, did not predict more aggressive behaviors at age 3, possibly because the spanking had begun at age 1 and by age 2 the kids were already more aggressive, Berlin said.

Researchers also looked at the effects of verbal punishment, defined as yelling, scolding or making derogatory comments. Verbal punishment was not associated with negative effects if the mother was otherwise attentive, loving and supportive.

Researchers controlled for family characteristics such as race, ethnicity, mother's age, education, family income and the child's gender.

Previous research has shown spanking is more common among low-income households than high-income households.

Researchers chose a sample of low-income families because some child behavior experts have argued that when spanking is "cultural normative" -- that is, it's expected for parents to use physical discipline -- the detrimental effects of spanking may be lessened.

"We did not find that," Berlin said. "Even in a sample of low-income people where presumably it's more normative to spank your kids, we found negative effects."

The study also found that mothers who said their children were "fussy" babies were more likely to spank them at ages 1, 2 and 3. But children who were more aggressive at 2 were not more likely to get spanked.

"The implication or the suggestion in past arguments is that some kids who are more aggressive or difficult to control might illicit more spanking, but that's not what we found," Berlin said.

Researchers found that black children were spanked and verbally punished the most, possibly because of cultural beliefs about the importance of respecting elders and in the value of physical discipline, or because parents feel they have to prepare their children for a racist and potentially dangerous world.

Of all the debates over child-rearing, spanking "definitely touches a nerve," Berlin said.

"It's a parenting practice that has been around for a long time, and that's also in transition," Berlin said. "In general, the use of spanking is going down. But there is also a contingent of people who really believe in it, who say that's how they were raised and it's a tradition they want to continue."

Elizabeth T. Gershoff, an associate professor in the department of human development and family sciences at University of Texas at Austin, said the study adds to a growing body of research showing negative effects of spanking.

"Almost all the studies point to negative effects of spanking," Gershoff said. "It makes kids more aggressive, more likely to be delinquent and to have mental health problems. The more kids are spanked, the more they are likely to be physically abused by their parents. This does not mean everyone who spanks physically abuses, but that risk is there."

offended?

Listening to the folks who insist that spanking is perfectly fine, if not sanctioned by the Bible (so is stoning to death but never mind), is amazing. The study is controlled with the exception of spanking or not. It doesn't claim that if you spank YOUR child, he/she will absolutely grow up to be poor, stupid and violent. It reports the statistical results in a scientifically accepted and peer-reviewed way.

Get a grip.

thebob.bob of OK @ Sep 16, 2009 19:36:12 PM

Amazed

After reading all of these comments I am amazed at how naive people can be. I don't think this article ever claims to be scientific and using the word "possibly" in an article is very accepted in these types of research articles. Also, for the gal or guy that made the first comment, I was not offended by your choice not to be PC, I agree that the PC crowd goes a little overboard at times. So you are right, you were not very PC at all, what you were is incredibly insulting, demeaning and rude. My favorite line was.... "That's because middle and upper income parents take time to love and care about their kids' lives". Indicating that lower-income parents do not love and care about their kids. That is just a wildly inaccurate and ridiculous statement. If you are working with lower-income people (all of whome you claim are crazy) you should consider finding a new job.

Sarah of CA @ Sep 16, 2009 17:20:45 PM

low income spaanking

Capital B Capital S!

What I'm about to say is going to offend soooo many people but I'm not politically correct and I'm sick of the PC crowd. I work all day dealing with low income folks and the majority (almost all) are complete idiots and usually demanding and aggressive themselves. They don't know how to deal with their own life let alone their kids'. Anyone who believes this study has no clue about the scientific process. Why not study high income parents who spank their kids? I'll bet they score higher on cognitive tests. That's because middle and upper income parents take time to love and care about their kids' lives. Yes that's right I said it. I see it everyday with low income people more concerned about getting snickers on their food stamps and pain pills with their free prescriptions (paid for by you and me) than they do about their kids running around out of control at 3 am. The parents don't even know where they are at half the time. These people can't balance a checkbook and they're supposed to know how to parent? If used sparingly spanking is ok. The important thing is love in the house and yes there can be both. Get a grip people. Spanking has been around forever. Child abuse is letting your kid grow up with no discipline and out of control.

Lee of WA @ Sep 16, 2009 06:49:09 AM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

U.S. News Rankings & Research

Best Hospitals

See the best hospitals, and the best children's hospitals, in specialties from cancer to urology.

Best Health Plans

U.S. News and NCQA review over 700 health insurance plans in the Best Health Plan rankings.

Best Nursing Homes

The Best Nursing Homes rankings feature data on 15,000-plus homes. Search for one near you.

Diseases & Conditions

Get information on preventing, treating, and managing diseases and conditions. Centers:

advertisement

Sponsored Poll

What factor do you think is responsible for the majority of teen-driving crashes?

View Results

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!