Bioidentical Hormones: Safer For Hot Flashes Than HRT?

Research suggests they may be a bit safer than conventional hormone therapy, if you proceed cautiously

By Deborah Kotz

Posted: March 25, 2009

To take hormones or not to take them? That is the question that plagues women suffering from nasty menopausal symptoms—those hot flashes and night sweats and the severe sleep deprivation and crankiness that come with them. Some women still opt for traditional hormone therapy, like Prempro, estrogen combined with progesterone, given to protect against endometrial cancer which can be triggered by using estrogen alone. But they're told to take the lowest dose for the shortest duration of time to minimize the increased risk of breast cancer associated with postmenopausal hormone use.

Other women have turned to what they believe to be a safer alternative: bioidentical hormones. These compounds are identical in molecular structure to the sex hormones produced in a woman's ovaries. For this reason, some experts theorize, they may act differently than those hormones most commonly used to treat menopausal symptoms, like conjugated equine estrogens, made from horses' urine, or medroxyprogesterone acetate, made in a lab. Indeed, recent research suggests that bioidentical hormones, created from plant chemicals, may not be as damaging to breast tissue as the most widely-used hormone regimens. A February study using data from the Women's Health Initiative found that taking a combination of estrogen and medroxyprogesterone acetate for five years doubled a woman's annual risk of getting breast cancer; the researchers didn't find the same increased breast cancer risk from women with hysterectomies, who were able to safely take estrogen alone, leading to theories that non-identical forms of progesterone called progestins are the primary culprit.

[See more on hormones and breast cancer.]

A European study of more than 80,000 postmenopausal women published last year in the journal Breast Cancer Research Treatment found that those who took progestins along with estrogen for an average of eight years had about a 70 percent higher risk of breast cancer than those who took bioidentical progesterone or who didn't use hormones at all. "Progesterone is definitely starting to look like a better hormone" than progestins, says Adriane Fugh-Berman, a physician and associate professor in the complementary and alternative medicine master's program at Georgetown University Medical Center. "There's some preliminary basic science showing that it might not stimulate the growth of breast cancer cells as much as synthetic progestins." She says bioidentical estrogens in a spray, gel, or suppository form, which enter the bloodstream directly through the skin, may offer protection against an increased risk of blood clots normally associated with estrogen pills, which enter the blood by passing through the liver, potentially spurring the production of blood-clotting proteins.

Still, Fugh-Berman stresses, "we shouldn't assume human hormones are our friends. After all, women with naturally higher estrogen levels have higher rates of breast cancer, and men with higher testosterone levels have higher rates of prostate cancer. So more is not always better." Where bioidenticals may come in handy, she says, is to treat that subgroup of menopausal women who suffer miserably through sleepless sweaty nights and seek a product that may be safer than traditional hormone therapy. But most doctors agree that those who take bioidenticals should still follow the "lowest dose for the shortest amount of time" rule of thumb.

[See how women deal with their HRT dilemmas.]

At the moment, that message may be getting lost in the homage being paid to bioidentical hormones by megawatt celebrities like Oprah Winfrey and actress and bestselling author Suzanne Somers. A January Oprah show featured both discussing their positive experiences on the hormones, which came across as a virtual cure-all for aging. Somers, who takes much higher doses of bioidentical hormones than most experts recommend, believes that the supplements keep her young and feeling sexy and are preventing her breast cancer from coming back. On her website, Winfrey writes, "After one day on bioidentical estrogen, I felt the veil lift. After three days, the sky was bluer, my brain was no longer fuzzy, my memory was sharper. I was literally singing and had a skip in my step."

Many medical experts have expressed alarm over the hype. Susan Love, a breast cancer surgeon and author of Dr. Susan Love's Breast Book, says Somers is taking a "crazy" approach to breast cancer prevention. "It isn't the flavor of the hormones," Love says, "but the fact that we're not supposed to have high levels of hormones during the second half of life." Days after the Oprah show aired, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists issued a press release reiterating the group's stance against the use of "so-called bioidentical hormones." The organization is particularly concerned about the use of those hormones that are compounded from individual ingredients on a patient-by-patient basis by pharmacies. The process can vary widely from pharmacist to pharmacist. Unlike with drugs made in large manufacturing facilities, there is no way of knowing if the product is pure or contains a standardized dose.

bio identical hormones.

I have been on bio identical progesterone cream for several years. I had severe uterine bleeding as I entered perimenopause. After 2 attempts with birth control to control the bleeding, I requested saliva testing and use of bio identicals. It significantly helped my mood, and the bleeding stopped for years until eventually I needed to have a hysterectomy. I had no side effects, unlike the birth control pills that left me severely depressed.

The statement that the labs have no standardized established measures has not been true for me. The routine saliva testing was able to show trends in my hormone levels and helped direct the decision making around the dosages used. While it is a "soft" test, many tests in medicine share the same status. CA 125 testing is known to show trends and be predictive of certain cancers, but can be elevated for non cancer problems. The lab I use has every standardized process in place that a pharmacutical lab would and lots of plaques to prove it. Pharmacueticals are made after studing a fairly small group of subjects ovarall, then released by the FDA. They are based often on Male size and weight. I prefer that someone did a very complete hormone panel and it specifically is treating my symptoms and that it can be adjusted to my symptoms. As I have went through the process of perimenopause, it has been important to adjust my dosages. I would not use it forever and don't believe it is the fountain of youth. I enjoy being older and wiser, but I think the standard answer that the labs are not standardized is misconstrued and fed but the pharmacuetical companies who, because they cannot patent a natural substance, use this discussion to scare users that it's not safe.

Dawn Krueger of WI @ Dec 08, 2009 18:15:51 PM

Bio-identicals...My opinion

When I see an expert physician like Dr. Berman so negative about bio-identicals, it makes me wonder if they may be understudied, politically manipulated and personally inexperienced with the natural hormones. This opposition from some physicians is thought to be wise in protecting against lawsuits so prevalent today. Usually, attorneys won't deviate from the "tried and true" and protect doctors using other than FDA approved pharmacuticals. However, I ask, how many energetic, sexy, calm, sexually fulfilled men and women on bio-identical hormones are suing their doctors today? It might be interesting to study the profile of a person who would file a lawsuit against their doctor. Maybe they are low on hormones and perhaps unhappy, unhealthy in general.

I urge the people to listen to the voices of personal experience and try bio-identical hormones for yourself. More women/men feeling healthier,fulfilled and more in charge of lives when using them, will eventually save visits to their doctors and ensuing insurance claims. That is the one challenge, it will mean less work for attorneys,doctors and insurance companies. The greater reward is reclaiming your right to decide what is better for your own body and time usage...

Michelle L. Gienger R. N. of WA @ Apr 28, 2009 09:52:57 AM

Prostrate cancer & T.

Dr. Berman needs to do better research ( PSA changes in Hypogonadal men treated w/ Testosterone Replacement Therapy, Coward,RM, Divi. of Urological Surgery, UNC, Chapel Hill, NC www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19154450? ) It the men low Testosterone levels who get P. cancer, NOT the other way around. PSA levels remain stable as well.

Berman must either be intellectually blind to this well known and proved information or maybe she is associated with Pharmacuetical company. The article with her statments should have a disclaimer as her statement is false ! WBH,MD Fla.

wayner b. houston,md of FL @ Apr 01, 2009 12:30:18 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

U.S. News Rankings & Research

Best Hospitals

See the best hospitals, and the best children's hospitals, in specialties from cancer to urology.

Best Health Plans

U.S. News and NCQA review over 700 health insurance plans in the Best Health Plan rankings.

Best Nursing Homes

The Best Nursing Homes rankings feature data on 15,000-plus homes. Search for one near you.

Diseases & Conditions

Get information on preventing, treating, and managing diseases and conditions. Centers:

advertisement

Sponsored Poll

What factor do you think is responsible for the majority of teen-driving crashes?

View Results

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!