Peanut Company Knew Its Plant Was Contaminated With Salmonella

By Nancy Shute

Posted: January 28, 2009

More bad news on salmonella tainted peanut butter: The peanut processor knew in 2007 that its plant was contaminated with potentially deadly salmonella but kept shipping out product anyway, according to officials at the Food and Drug Administration. With so much stuff in the pipeline, expect more sick people and more recalls, FDA officials said yesterday.

This outbreak has already killed eight people and sickened at least 501 so far, making it the most deadly food contamination outbreak in at least the past 20 years. Victims include a 72-year-old Minnesota woman who died after eating peanut butter in a nursing home, and Christopher Meunier, a 7-year-old boy from South Burlington, Vt., who fell ill and was hospitalized in November after eating peanut butter crackers. He has since recovered.

Peanut butter has traditionally been considered a low-risk food. It didn't turn up on the food safety worry list until 2007, when a salmonella outbreak was traced to jars of Peter Pan and Great Value peanut butter from a ConAgra plant in Georgia. This current outbreak is much, much larger, because the implicated Peanut Corp. of America plant in Blakely, Ga., has distributed huge amounts of peanut butter and peanut paste to manufacturers of hundreds of products, from Trader Joe's Nutty Chocolate Chewy Coated & Drizzled Granola Bars to ShopRite Peanut Butter and Cheese Cracker Snacks. Add to that the fact that many of the tainted products are the sorts of things that people stockpile at home and work for snacks and lunchbox treats, and it's easy to see how the outbreak could continue for weeks, if not months.

The best advice to avoid the bad bug: Purge your pantry, desk drawer, and glove compartment of granola bars, crackers, and other products that contain peanuts. Girl Scout cookies are OK, thank goodness. But many other products, including dog biscuits, are not. The FDA has a long list of recalled products and is encouraging people to keep checking it, as it's growing. But the FDA recalls are voluntary, meaning that manufacturers have to make the effort to figure out if they used the bad peanut products, then contact the FDA and stores. Many manufacturers are still in the midst of the process.

"It's critically important that people don't have any of these contaminated products," says Caroline Smith DeWaal, food safety director at the Center for Science in the Public Interest, a consumer advocacy group. She saw a "voluntary recall sign" two days ago at her local CVS store in Maryland, and asked the store to cross off the word "voluntary". "Just because it's voluntary doesn't mean it's not serious," she says. If you've got some suspicious peanut products, you can take them back to the store and ask them to replace them with something they know is not contaminated, such as a granola bar without peanuts. Jarred peanut butter has not been implicated in this outbreak.

Peanuts have been considered a low-risk food because roasting usually kills bacteria like salmonella. From 1998 to 2006, outbreaks in fresh produce and animal products were far more likely to cause illness, according to information compiled by the Center for Science in the Public Interest. A snapshot of CSPI's data:

The current salmonella outbreak's death toll of eight exceeds the tolls of the 1993 E. coli outbreak at Jack in the Box that gave fast-food burgers a bad name, or the 2006 outbreak of E. coli in spinach. Expect fast action from Congress on proposals to overhaul the FDA's food safety efforts. Under current law, peanut processors don't have to tell state inspectors or the FDA if they find salmonella in their plant. The FDA says that Peanut Corp. found salmonella repeatedly in 2007 and 2008 but did not report it. The Georgia Department of Agriculture inspected the Blakely, Ga., plant twice last year, and found dirty equipment, but did not test for salmonella, according to the Associated Press.


Here's more on the health violations at the Peanut Corp. of America plant in Georgia, as well as a good FAQ on this salmonella outbreak from the FDA. Earlier I talked with Michele Morrone, a food safety expert at Ohio University, on why packaged products with peanut butter can provide an ideal breeding ground for salmonella. And here's an explanation why foods that are more processed are usually less healthy.

Retribution

The Peanut Company's personal who knowingly shipped their contaminated products to the food chain should be prosecuted to the fullist extent of the law.

Mary A. Hellmann of IL @ Feb 06, 2009 11:26:49 AM

the penut

we all know we should watch we eat and it coul dbe in any tyes of food. mostly wee we at least expect it. so we all know now to watch what we break down in our system because you never know what it leads too. stop having a favorite because your favorite can be the one that kills you.

keke of GA @ Feb 04, 2009 13:33:55 PM

Bill is the exception, I hope...

Have we seriously lost our collective ability to empathize, or feel even the least emotion for someone other than ourselves? I hope not... but I'm concerned Bill may be a symptom of a much large problem, a relatively recent change in the way our society.

Bill, your comments are shocking and disappointing, to say the least.

When it is within your power to do good or prevent bad, but you choose doing neither, that makes you worthless at best...

Peanut Corp had plenty of warning and opportunities to, as someone else mentioned, close, clean and restart. Yes, they would have lost a day's revenues... But those possibilities should have been factored into their quarterly earning forecasts anyway. That type of business practice should be something which no Board or executive could punish or even think of sidestepping.

When you process food, your #1 job is to protect the public health where any risk is known, not expose people to risk without their prior consent, or do anything that they (management) would not want to be subjected to themselves. Period.

Like I said before... If Peanut Corp knew their families and loved ones couldn't hide behind the legal "Corp" protections they've built for themselves, and could actually be forcibly compelled to eat their own products at any time... you can be sure we wouldn't have 8 people to bury today... Or, as Bill might comment .. "Just" 8 people. Lucky for you Bill, it wasn't someone you loved...

Thomas of CA @ Feb 02, 2009 19:07:21 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

U.S. News Rankings & Research

Best Hospitals

See the best hospitals, and the best children's hospitals, in specialties from cancer to urology.

Best Health Plans

U.S. News and NCQA review over 700 health insurance plans in the Best Health Plan rankings.

Best Nursing Homes

The Best Nursing Homes rankings feature data on 15,000-plus homes. Search for one near you.

Diseases & Conditions

Get information on preventing, treating, and managing diseases and conditions. Centers:

advertisement

Sponsored Poll

What factor do you think is responsible for the majority of teen-driving crashes?

View Results

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!