Obama to End Stem Cell Ban Monday

Researchers applaud his action, which is expected to kick-start efforts to unlock therapeutic potential

Posted: March 7, 2009

By Amanda Gardner
HealthDay Reporter

SATURDAY, March 7 (HealthDay News) -- President Barack Obama will lift the eight-year ban on embryonic stem cell research on Monday, the White House has announced.

A White House ceremony is scheduled for late morning, when Obama will issue an executive order formally removing the federal funding limits imposed by his predecessor, President George W. Bush, in 2001.

And while The New York Times reports that it may take many months for the National Institutes of Health to develop new guidelines for research, researchers were already applauding the president's actions.

"The availability of federal funding for research on cell lines that had been off-limits during the Bush administration, coupled with billions of newly available dollars in federal stimulus money, could set the stage for a tidal wave of support that could propel stem cell research well into the next decade -- if things move quickly," said a prepared statement from Stanford University researchers in California.

"This action is both welcome and overdue," added Dr. Philip Pizzo, dean of the Stanford School of Medicine and a governing board member of the California Institute of Regenerative Medicine, in the statement. "This vote of confidence from President Obama in the promise of embryonic stem cell research validates and extends CIRM's mission to help millions of people suffering from currently incurable medical conditions. It is also a powerful signal that advances in medical research must be pursued even in times of economic difficulty."

Peter T. Wilderotter, president and CEO of the Christopher And Dana Reeve Foundation in Short Hills, N.J., said in a prepared statement, "With a stroke of his pen, President Obama acknowledged the will of the majority of Americans and harnessed the power of the federal government to move research forward. By removing politics from science, President Obama has freed researchers to explore these remarkable stem cells, learn from them and possibly develop effective therapies using them."

The general enthusiasm followed a wave of similar sentiments last month when initial reports of the new policy came out of a closed-door meeting between Obama and House Democrats.

"It's going to remove an embarrassment for American science," said Dr. Darwin Prockop, director of the Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine Institute for Regenerative Medicine at Scott & White Hospital in Temple, said in February. "It's a statement that we're going to again believe in science."

Stem cell research received a big boost in January, when the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the first-ever human trial using embryonic stem cells as a medical treatment.

Geron Corp., a California-based biotech company, was given the OK to implant embryonic stem cells in eight to 10 paraplegic patients who can use their arms but can't walk.

In 2001, then-president Bush limited federal funding for stem cell research only to human embryonic stem cell lines that already existed.

The decision prompted some scientists to worry that the United States would fall behind other countries in the drive to unlock the potential of stem cell research.

Embryonic stem cells are the most basic human cells, believed to be capable of growing into any type of cell in the body. Working as a sort of repair system for the body, they can theoretically divide without limit to replenish other cells. The scientific hope is that stem cells may, at some point in the future, become capable of treating a variety of diseases and conditions, such as Parkinson's disease, diabetes, heart disease and spinal cord injuries, according to the U.S. National Institutes of Health.

National polls continue to find that the majority of Americans favors embryonic stem cell research, although some surveys have found that that support has declined somewhat in recent years.

Many people object to the use of embryonic stem cells, contending that the research requires the destruction of potential life, because the cells must be extracted from human embryos.

The stem cells being used in the recently approved Geron trial were obtained from one of the Bush administration's approved stem cell lines. And no federal funds were used in the development of this treatment.

This Brian guy is a e-freak!

I was browsing around about stem cells for my English paper and this Brian guy is well, a stalker of stem cells! He has posted on what seems almost all the stem cell articles I have read that have comments! FREAK!

Who comes back to an article 3 months later to follow up on comments???

W

E

I

R

D

O

Bobby of IL @ Dec 19, 2009 03:49:11 AM

Joe of TN...

"I love the references to 7th grade science textbooks, where Brian's science education ended."

Joe, answer the question: since science textbooks (including those used by students well beyond seventh grade) accurately cite fertilization as the beginning of a new human being's life, on what grounds, exactly, do you argue otherwise?

"Brian, the funding is available, and will most likely continue to available indefinitely. Good for you for fighting the good fight, but victory is soooo so sweet."

I can't wait until a majority of Americans realize what a waste of resources ESCR have proved to be. In California, the CIRM announced that only four of its fourteen stem-cell projects will involve embryonic stem cells.

Brian Gillin of PA @ Oct 31, 2009 19:56:47 PM

Ellen Goodman's Stupid "Burning Fertility Clinic" Question

Alan Yavina: "Mr Gillin, if you were a firefighter, and you could save either a five year old girl or twenty frozen embryos from an inferno, who would you save?"

Your "argument," stolen from Ellen Goodman, has been addressed at great length in EMBRYO, by George and Tollefsen. For one thing, one might choose to save the five-year-old girl because there's no guarantee that someone could successfully implant the twenty embryos (which is an indictment, really, of in vitro fertilization). For another thing, arguing that one would choose to save someone other than a human embryo is nowhere near the same thing as saying that the human embryo should be deliberately killed, which is what takes place withing ESCR.

Brian Gillin of PA @ Oct 31, 2009 19:52:33 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

U.S. News Rankings & Research

Best Hospitals

See the best hospitals, and the best children's hospitals, in specialties from cancer to urology.

Best Health Plans

U.S. News and NCQA review over 700 health insurance plans in the Best Health Plan rankings.

Best Nursing Homes

The Best Nursing Homes rankings feature data on 15,000-plus homes. Search for one near you.

Diseases & Conditions

Get information on preventing, treating, and managing diseases and conditions. Centers:

advertisement

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!