Scientists Heartened at Prospect of End to Stem Cell Ban

Move by Obama expected to kick-start efforts to unlock therapeutic potential

Posted: February 9, 2009

By Amanda Gardner
HealthDay Reporter

MONDAY, Feb. 9 (HealthDay News) -- Researchers are rejoicing over President Barack Obama's anticipated lifting of the eight-year ban on embryonic stem cell research imposed by his predecessor, President George W. Bush.

The anticipation moved one step closer to reality Thursday, with media reports that Obama gave House Democrats at a closed-door Virginia retreat a "guarantee" that he would sign an executive order overturning Bush's policy.

"It's going to remove an embarrassment for American science," said Dr. Darwin Prockop, director of the Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine Institute for Regenerative Medicine at Scott & White Hospital in Temple. "It's a statement that we're going to again believe in science."

Yet those same experts are aware that the sobering state of the economy could impose its own restrictions on this type of research.

"This clearly is a very important part of our medical future," said Paul Sanberg, distinguished professor of neurosurgery and director of the University of South Florida Center of Excellence for Aging and Brain Repair in Tampa. "[But] to clear the path for this without giving additional money to the National Institutes of Health will be disappointing. I hope the stimulus package also includes an increase in embryonic stem cell funding."

Sanberg also expressed concern that any monies redirected to stem cell research could divert funds from other critical avenues of research. "If it's a normal competitive process, it will take money away from other programs," he said.

Stem cell research received a big boost in January, when the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the first-ever human trial using embryonic stem cells as a medical treatment.

Geron Corp., a California-based biotech company, was given the OK to implant embryonic stem cells in eight to 10 paraplegic patients who can use their arms but can't walk.

In 2001, then-president Bush limited federal funding for stem cell research only to human embryonic stem cell lines that already existed.

The decision prompted some scientists to worry that the United States would fall behind other countries in the drive to unlock the potential of stem cell research.

Embryonic stem cells are the most basic human cells, believed to be capable of growing into any type of cell in the body. Working as a sort of repair system for the body, they can theoretically divide without limit to replenish other cells. The scientific hope is that stem cells may, at some point in the future, become capable of treating a variety of diseases and conditions, such as Parkinson's disease, diabetes, heart disease and spinal cord injuries, according to the U.S. National Institutes of Health.

National polls continue to find that the majority of Americans favors embryonic stem cell research, although some surveys have found that that support has declined somewhat in recent years.

Many people object to the use of embryonic stem cells, contending that the research requires the destruction of potential life, because the cells must be extracted from human embryos.

The stem cells being used in the recently approved Geron trial were obtained from one of the Bush administration's approved stem cell lines. And no federal funds were used in the development of this treatment.

Since the restrictions on embryonic stem cell research took effect, many research institutions have redirected their focus to other types of stem cells. Prockop's institution, for instance, deals only with adult stem cells.

Adult stem cells can give rise to all the specialized types of cells found in tissue from which they originated, such as skin. But, scientists don't agree on whether adult stem cells may yield cell types other than those of the tissue from which they originate, according to the National Institutes of Health.

Prockop said embryonic stem cells "are mainly of interest as a research tool and a biological experimental system. Their use in patients in spite of that recent approval for Geron is really very questionable because of the potential for tumors."

Still, the anticipated lessening of restrictions by the Obama administration may help funnel more private money into stem cell research, the experts said.

AN OVUM DONORS VIEW

I was an ovum donor. Californis requires that donors state specifically where they want "excess" embryos to go if not used by the intended couple (made law in 2003) Other states do not have this. While a patient at Yale I was way over stimulated to produce over 30 eggs instead of the normal 6-10, presumably so they could have more "excess" embryos for their research program. I felt robbed. I know there are a lot of hopeful suffering people out there seeking cures but you are being sold false hopes. There is no convincing data that any of these treatments produce any progress and to the contrary, can actually have negative health consequences...turning into tumors and cancer. Women are being over stimulated to create these "excess" embryos and suffering serious psychological consequences. Embryos are disappearing from fertility clinics and hospital to supply these embryos for research and the FBI has to go chasing them all over the globe. I am not against the research but regulations need to be masde to preserve the ethics. If you are receiving these treatments you have a responsibilty to inquire as to the integrity of the business, so that more victums are not produced as a result. If my embryos ever make it to patient as some form of treatment, I hope it provides some hope and does not just lead to more suffering. I will forever have to wonder what happened to these tiny, precious, pieces of me that I entended to become a child for an infetile couple...not to be manufactured into some potentially harmful biopharmaceutical.

Kristen of ID @ Feb 23, 2009 12:26:40 PM

Stem Cells

The moron who wrote the first first comment above obviously does not have a child who has diabetes nor does he know of what he speaks. These cells have the potential to cure Type 1 diabetes which is typically diagnosed in a patient during childhood. From that point forward, they use insulin as life support since without it they would be dead in a matter days. He probably believes the lies George Bush was telling the public about stem cells. Where is the "ethical" dilemma in using something that would otherwise be flushed or otherwise disposed of as "medical waste" for research that could potentially cure millions of Americans of this insidious and devestating disease? Let's go with Bush and let them all die, go blind, suffer end stage renal disease, brain damage, amputations, heart attack or stroke rather than use an embryo that would be thrown away...

Russ Foster of SC @ Feb 17, 2009 14:34:21 PM

Self-Contradictory Article

"Stem cell research received a big boost in January, when the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the first-ever human trial using embryonic stem cells as a medical treatment."

How? You JUST WROTE THAT IT'S BEEN BANNED for the past several years. Do you see this self-contradiction?

Bush did NOT "ban" embryonic stem cell research; he merely installed some sensible guidelines and limited funding to those stem cell lines already created, from embryonic human beings already destroyed. I suppose that doesn't make a juicy enough story for you, and so you fallaciously claim that there is a "ban."

For anyone to argue that we'll "finally" be respecting science in this country is a direct affront to anyone who's performed any other type of research. Such people apparently believe that there should be no ethics within science and medicine, but millions of Americans disagree. And we're not alone: years after Bush found his compromise, the European Union came to exactly the same agreement: European Union installs same guidelines as did Bush:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/5209106.stm.

Notice that that BBC link mentions that most of the stem cell research being done in EUROPE involves adult, NOT embryonic stem cells. Apparently, President Bush wasn't the only one who supports maintaining a healthy relationship between science and ethics.

Brian Gillin of PA @ Feb 10, 2009 22:35:56 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

U.S. News Rankings & Research

Best Hospitals

See the best hospitals, and the best children's hospitals, in specialties from cancer to urology.

Best Health Plans

U.S. News and NCQA review over 700 health insurance plans in the Best Health Plan rankings.

Best Nursing Homes

The Best Nursing Homes rankings feature data on 15,000-plus homes. Search for one near you.

Diseases & Conditions

Get information on preventing, treating, and managing diseases and conditions. Centers:

advertisement

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!