On Women

Obama's Budget: Shortchanging Women's Health?

By Deborah Kotz

Posted: May 8, 2009

While women's health activists were pleased to see that President Obama ended funding for abstinence-only education, they're sharply critical of other aspects of his planned budget, leading me to believe that the 100-day honeymoon is over. The Center for Reproductive Rights issued a statement saying the group is "deeply disappointed with President Obama's failure to strike government funding restrictions on abortion." Planned Parenthood says the budget "misses an opportunity to build on one of the nation's most effective programs in reducing unintended pregnancies"—namely the Title X program that funds family-planning clinics for poor women who don't have health insurance. Besides ending funding for abstinence-only education programs and providing $178 million for evidence-based comprehensive sex-ed programs, the new 2010 budget:

I asked Northup to give me a report card on some of the changes in policy on key women's health issues I predicted would occur after Obama was elected. Here's how he's doing so far, in her opinion:

1. No more federal funds for abstinence-only education.
Grade: A

2. No more global gag rule. On George W. Bush's first day as president in 2001, he reinstituted the "global gag rule" that restricted federally funded clinics in foreign countries from performing abortions or even providing referrals for abortion. Obama rescinded the rule soon after taking office. Grade: A

3. Better coverage for family planning. Federal coverage for abortion services has been a disappointment to Northup and others. But discounted birth control pills may soon be available again on college campuses, and health insurers have indicated they may stop charging women higher insurance premiums, thanks, in part, to Obama's efforts. Grade: C

[See more details about cheap birth control again for college women.]

4. Reversal of the " conscience " regulation that threatens women ' s access to birth control. Obama has taken steps to reverse a rule put in place during Bush's last days that allows doctors and other healthcare workers to opt out of certain practices that some of them find morally objectionable—like prescribing birth control pills, inserting IUDs, or dispensing emergency contraception to rape victims—without fear of losing their jobs. The rule was opposed by most medical organizations. Obama has issued a rule deleting the Bush one; the new regulation could go into effect later this year. Grade: A (for effort)

[Read more about this here.]

5. Increases in funding for reproductive health clinics that serv e the uninsured. Obama's measly increase in Title X funding is disappointing. Grade: D

6. Improved access to pills and abortions for U.S. military women serving overseas. Grade: F

Grade average: C-plus

It goes without saying that Northup's grades don't necessarily represent the majority view, since Americans have varying opinions on all of these issues. How do you think Obama is stacking up so far when it comes to women's health issues? Is he passing or failing? Would he make honor roll?

How would you grade Obama on women's health?

View Results
ZirPFHKfWwAiLftQar

lemyaskin rulezz

lemyaskin of DE @ Sep 22, 2009 21:49:16 PM

Women's health in Obama budget

I am shocked and disappointed that there is not provision for access to abortion for women in the military. It is not in women's interest nor in the interests of the military. Can you imagine having to leave Iraq or Afganistan to get an abortion and have to pay for the travel and the procedure out of your own pocket?

I am encouraged by Obama's rejection of abstinence only education. However the funding is so inadequate.

Likewise, Federal money for birth control is so unrealistic under Title X. This is for uninsured women. For every dollar spent by government on birth control four dollars in future medical expenses are saved. In addition, the heartbreak and disruption of your life is prevented when you can control your fertilty.

This administration is trying to meet women's health needs better, but it can not do it without more courage and more money for these services.

Susan Heitner of NY @ May 13, 2009 21:23:08 PM

O'Bama Budget: Shortchanging Women's Health?

This information is down right disrespectfull to all women. Makes me wonder how O'Bama's own mother would feel about this big rip off. Women in college have enough to be concerned about if they ever want a career after their college graduation. Or maybe, some of them don't intend to finish their advanced education; perhaps they'd rather settle down and have a family...in that case they'd be better off getting married and forget about pursuing a career. WHAT the hell gives here anyway!!! O yeah, I forgot, O'Bama's mother was a single mom so maybe he thinks all women should skip abstinence and just...well, you know, get pregnant and become a single parent. What the ----! Seems to be the trend anyway. And what's the trend you ask? Sexual promisquity without responsibility. So, sure go ahead, get an abortion or take a pill and mess up your GOD-Given life!!! Guess you don't give a rat's butt anyway!!!

Randall Laraway of OH @ May 12, 2009 21:15:11 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

On Women

On Women

Deborah Kotz, senior writer for U.S. News & World Report, covers everything women care about when it comes to their health. She's often tapping out "Oprah-esque" confessions about how the latest news relates to her personally—whether it's on breast cancer, contraception or easing work-family stress. She'd love to hear your confessions too at onwomen@usnews.com. Also, you can follow Deborah on Twitter at twitter.com/debkotz2.

Health Check

advertisement

Blog Favorites

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!