On Women

Why 1 in 4 Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients Still Opt for Mastectomies

By Deborah Kotz

Posted: October 13, 2009

For more than 20 years, breast cancer patients have been overtreated with mastectomies, experts contend, instead of with breast-sparing surgery that removes just the lump and a little of the surrounding tissue. The good news is about 75 percent of women who qualify for breast-conserving surgery are getting it, according to a survey of 2,000 women published in today's Journal of the American Medical Association.

The study found that for those who still opted for total breast removal, the decision was sometimes based on a surgeon's recommendation and sometimes against medical advice. In fact, nearly 9 percent of breast cancer patients opted to get a mastectomy when their doctors didn't state a preference either way or when their doctors actually urged them to get breast-conserving surgery. "Our findings suggest that patient preferences play an important role in initial receipt of mastectomy, especially in the absence of a surgeon recommendation favoring one procedure over another," wrote the study's authors.

[Watch this video on the rates of mastectomies versus breast-conserving surgery.]

The survey identified the most common reasons why women were opting for mastectomies. Many didn't want to deal with radiation treatments, routinely given after lumpectomies to prevent local recurrence. Others wanted peace of mind that all of their cancer was removed, but often were unaware that survival rates for the two surgeries are the same for early stage breast cancer. (Neither surgery guarantees that the cancer hasn't already spread.)

At a news conference announcing the study, lead author Monica Morrow, a breast surgeon at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, said doctors need to do a better job of communicating information about survival rates. "Fewer than 50 percent of women who chose to have mastectomies recalled 6 months later that survival rates for the two surgeries are equal," she said—which means that if women were indeed told this information by their surgeons, it didn't sink in. Surgeons also need to make more of an effort, she said, to shrink larger tumors with chemotherapy administered before surgery to enable more women to avoid mastectomies. Research shows there's no survival difference if surgery is delayed to administer chemo, yet many doctors are reluctant to employ this approach, perhaps because it's relatively new.

I'm also wondering if more women would opt for breast-sparing surgery if they knew how harrowing breast reconstruction can be. A former colleague of mine, a physician, told me that the most painful part of his wife's recovery from breast cancer was her reconstruction surgery. And a close friend who needed a mastectomy to remove a fairly large tumor recently needed several surgeries to reconstruct her new breast. I'm sure she would have jumped at breast-conserving surgery if she'd been a candidate.

Check it out: The New York Times ran a disturbing piece yesterday on the price of fertility treatments—in terms of health problems associated with multiple births. And AOL's That's Fit blog has an interesting column on running with your romantic partner. I run occasionally with my husband and relish the uninterrupted conversation, but this column cites a host of other motivating factors.

Mastectomy plus reconstruction

I am one of those early-stagers who had a double mastectomy and reconstruction. A screening mammogram revealed that I had a 6mm, grade 3, HER2 positive tumor and lots of DCIS in my right breast, at the tender age of 39. My talented, fabulous, wonderful surgeon carefully explained both options to me, gave me time to think, and referred me to an excellent plastic surgeon. After realizing that I'd go through 6 weeks of radiation and have a malformed right breast when all was said and done, I decided to take the whole thing off. I added the left breast to the whole package because I had very dense breast tissue and didn't want to wake up every morning wondering if I'd developed a second primary in my left breast. Cutting that risk from 5% to 1% made sense to me - if I was going under the knife once, I wanted to do everything I could to make sure I didn't have to do that again.

In April, I had areola and nipple sparing mastectomies and immediate reconstruction with cohesive silicone implants. My new breasts are just about identiscal to my previous pair - except a little larger and rounder! My scars are under my breast and invisible unless you lift them up. The recovery was quite easy, no worse than having muscle pain from doing too many pushups.

In short, I KNEW I was a candidate for lumpectomy and radiation, and very consciously chose against it. I was blessed with a very talented surgical team and supportive family, not to mention great insurance - and so I've got no regrets.

However, I believe I speak for many women when I say the following: I am sick and tired of doctors and the media second-guessing our health choices. I realize overtreatment is a major issue in our society and that mastectomy, mammograms, and adjuvant (chemo and biological) treatment all carry risks and costs. However, we also get daily exposure to messages about the dangers of breast cancer, the importance of early detection, and the promise of permanent cure if we act decisively. All of us know at least one woman who's suffered through the miserable death that breast cancer brings. Moreover, there are many issues in cancer treatment that are up for debate and discussion in the oncology community, where uncertainties about epidemiology and treatment abound. Lastly, we live in a society where we patients are told to be proactive in making our treatment decisions, that we're responsible for taking care of our health. Is it any wonder that so many of us choose to be as aggressive as possible when addressing this disease? Don't shake your head in wonder at our "preferences," however irrational they might seem, until you've walked in our shoes.

Laura of NM @ Dec 01, 2009 15:18:15 PM

EARLY STAGE BREAST CANCER

PLEASE EXPLAIN TO ME IF 2ND SURGERY SHOWED MARGINAL CLEAR EACH TIME NO LYMPH NODES REMOVED WHY HAVE ANY TREATMENT? OR IF TREATMENT WHY NOT ONLY TAMOXIFEN. WHY CAN'T I ONLY TAKE TAMOXIFEN? TO ME IT SEEMS EVEN AFTER RADIATION YOU NEED BREAST RECONSTRUCTION. PLEASE BE KIND ENOUGH TO ANSWER. THANK YOU

SARAH ROUNDTREE of NY @ Nov 08, 2009 12:01:35 PM

RE: 1 in 4 opting for bi-lateral mastectomy?

My experience was that I went very calming into a choice and then several doc's proceeded to scare the life out of me and I had a dx of DCIS which has a very good outcome. I believe it is the doctors especially the surgeons who encourage mastectomy's when a breast conserving method would work almost as well. So if that is even remotely true, how can we trust the doctors at all??? This is a very important piece of the information always left out. THE DOCTORS ARE TO BLAME!

Dee of AZ @ Nov 04, 2009 15:40:46 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

On Women

On Women

Deborah Kotz, senior writer for U.S. News & World Report, covers everything women care about when it comes to their health. She's often tapping out "Oprah-esque" confessions about how the latest news relates to her personally—whether it's on breast cancer, contraception or easing work-family stress. She'd love to hear your confessions too at onwomen@usnews.com. Also, you can follow Deborah on Twitter at twitter.com/debkotz2.

Health Check

advertisement

Blog Favorites

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!