On Women

Abortion Doctor Murder: A Threat to Access?

By Deborah Kotz

Posted: June 1, 2009

News that abortion provider George Tiller was gunned down yesterday in his church should make every woman sit up and take notice. Despite having a president and Congress who favor abortion rights and a new Supreme Court nominee who presumably does as well, the safety and support of healthcare practitioners who provide them are obviously critical if women are going to have access. Certainly, Tiller was a controversial figure, as he performed abortions late into pregnancy—one of only three doctors in the country to do so. His killing was denounced by leaders from all political stripes, from President Obama to the president of Operation Rescue, an antiabortion group that has long had a Tiller Watch on its website. No one advocates murder.

While killings are rare—this is the first in a decade—abortion providers are frequently harassed and live in fear for their lives. I previously interviewed Warren Hern, who runs an abortion clinic in Boulder, Colo., and told me that the job "causes social and professional isolation and ruins your life." Like Tiller, Hern is willing to perform late-term abortions when fetuses have severe medical problems. And, like Tiller, he was put on an antiabortion hit list back in the early 1990s and targeted for assassination. He still receives regular death threats, and his Boulder clinic has been shot at by a sniper.

The ostracism, though, extends to doctors who perform abortions in only the first 12 weeks of pregnancy, which nearly half of Americans believe should be a woman's legal right. Hern says he knows physicians in his area who hide the fact that they do abortions because of the scorn they would face from friends, families, patients—even other gynecologists. I've had a hard time getting gynecologists to speak on the record about whether women in this country are having a harder time gaining access to abortions; one doctor told me that he didn't want his name or academic affiliation used for fear that he might have grant money withheld if he's associated with the procedure. It's no wonder the number of doctors performing abortions is dwindling.

Meantime, states are marching forward with their own efforts to limit a woman's access to abortion services. While they can't outlaw abortion outright under Roe v. Wade , state legislators can make it more difficult for women to obtain abortions. Indiana, for instance, has a bill pending that would require doctors who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at a hospital. Of the seven physicians performing abortions in Indiana, only one doctor has admitting privileges at a hospital, according to the Indianapolis Star.

A May report from the Guttmacher Institute provides this rundown of state laws currently on the books. Some make sense as a way to protect the well-being of pregnant women; others seem intended to restrict access to abortions.

Physician and Hospital Requirements: 38 states require an abortion to be performed by a licensed physician. 19 states require an abortion to be performed in a hospital after a specified point in the pregnancy, and 18 states require the involvement of a second physician after a specified point.

Gestational Limits: 36 states prohibit abortions, generally except when necessary to protect the woman's life or health, after a specified point in pregnancy, most often fetal viability.

"Partial-Birth" Abortion: 15 states have laws in effect that prohibit "partial-birth" abortion. 4 of these laws apply only to post-viability abortions.

Public Funding: 17 states use their own funds to pay for all or most medically necessary abortions for Medicaid enrollees in the state. 32 states and the District of Columbia prohibit the use of state funds except in those cases when federal funds are available: where the woman's life is in danger or the pregnancy is the result of rape or incest. In defiance of federal requirements, South Dakota limits funding to cases of life endangerment only.

Coverage by Private Insurance: 4 states restrict coverage of abortion in private insurance plans to cases in which the woman's life would be endangered if the pregnancy were carried to term. Additional abortion coverage is permitted only if the woman purchases it at her own expense.

Refusal: 46 states allow individual health care providers to refuse to participate in an abortion. 43 states allow institutions to refuse to perform abortions, 16 of which limit refusal to private or religious institutions.

State-Mandated Counseling: 17 states mandate that women be given counseling before an abortion that includes information on at least one of the following: the purported link between abortion and breast cancer (6 states), the ability of a fetus to feel pain (8 states), long-term mental health consequences for the woman (7 states) or information on the availability of ultrasound (6 states).

Waiting Periods: 24 states require a woman seeking an abortion to wait a specified period of time, usually 24 hours, between when she receives counseling and the procedure is performed. 6 of these states have laws that effectively require the woman make two separate trips to the clinic to obtain the procedure.

Oh, now we use the word murder.

Nevermind that Tiller murdered babies, as they were about to be born in the full term. And nevermind that he would thrust a needle in their heads and suck the brains out, followed by a memorial ceremony and even baptisms for the murdered child! No, all you are worried about, Deborah, is the poor old murderer who finally got what was coming to him. I do not condone murder of any kind, but this man got what he deserved. He was a sick, demented man who not only mocked God by continuing to attend "church", but performed heinous operations that are condemned by even the most rabid abortion proponents. Sickening...

Darryl H. of CA @ Jun 25, 2009 18:18:48 PM

Abortion, or baby killing?

A Dr takes an oath to "do no harm". Why anyone would think the killing of an infant would not stir emotions in normal people is simply byond my ken.

People stand by while others beat an animal to death and are called "callous".

New Yorkers walked around a man hit by a car and ignored him untill he died on a street corner. They were called "unfeeling".

Now, someone has acted against the killing of children and he is compared to the one who killed the children. Where is the logic?

Charles of LA @ Jun 02, 2009 17:11:26 PM

Abortion Doctor Murder

I happen to think abortion should be rare but legal. I also happen to think guns should be rare but legal.

What an irony that a pro-lifer (presumably) should take a life. And what a shame we continue, in an "enlightened" time, to be unable to solve the problems around abortion, gun ownership, drugs, poverty, and others.

Shame on us.

Ron W. Smith of UT @ Jun 02, 2009 16:58:18 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

On Women

On Women

Deborah Kotz, senior writer for U.S. News & World Report, covers everything women care about when it comes to their health. She's often tapping out "Oprah-esque" confessions about how the latest news relates to her personally—whether it's on breast cancer, contraception or easing work-family stress. She'd love to hear your confessions too at onwomen@usnews.com. Also, you can follow Deborah on Twitter at twitter.com/debkotz2.

Health Check

advertisement

Blog Favorites

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!