Health Buzz: Court Rules on Vaccines and Autism, and Other Health News

By U.S. News Staff

Posted: February 13, 2009

Vaccines Not to Blame for Autism, Court Rules

Vaccines are not to blame for autism in three children, according to long-awaited rulings from a special federal court yesterday, Nancy Shute reports. The families had filed claims arguing that the measles-mumps-rubella shot, which contained the mercury-based preservative thimerosal, was responsible for their children's autism and other neurological problems.

The cases have been intensely watched in the hugely contentious battle over whether or not vaccines cause autism. Both sides hoped that a win in "vaccine court" would end the controversy, which was sparked by a 1998 paper in the British journal Lancet that linked developmental delays and MMR vaccinations. That paper is controversial; 10 of the 13 authors retracted it in 2004, but the lead author, Andrew Wakefield, has not. A report in this week's London Sunday Times says Wakefield altered clinical findings on 8 of 12 children in the study, a charge Wakefield denies. These latest rulings won't end the debate but will make it harder for families who seek compensation from a federal vaccine injury fund.

Should parents take a flexible approach to vaccination? Here are the pros and cons. Meanwhile, vaccine developer Paul Offitt says allergies to vaccines pose the biggest health risk. U.S. News also examined the larger issue of vaccine safety, offered advice on what parents can do to protect kids, and explained what parents should know about the latest vaccine news.

Consider a Valentine's Day Workout With Your Significant Other

Working out with your significant other (or even a platonic buddy) can reap benefits: It's often more fun to exercise with company, you motivate each other to actually get out the door, and your workout gets a shakeup. U.S. News's Katherine Hobson explains why she enjoyed working out with her boyfriend, even though she had assumed that the idea of couples exercising together was strictly for codependents. Hobson found that not only is it fun to work out with your significant other (or friend, for that matter), but there are some real athletic benefits: 1) You shake up your usual workout. 2) When you're trading off on the weight bench, you actually get the required rest in between sets. 3) It makes you work harder, since you get competitive in your supposed activity of expertise. 4) You try activities that you wouldn't ever do alone, and sometimes they even find their way into your individual repertoire.

Perhaps working out together might make a good Valentine's Day activity. If you decide to make a go of it, here are 10 tips for working out with your significant other. Besides being fun, trying novel activities together is good for your love life. Earlier, Hobson explained how to get the most from your workout.

Geography Affects Rates of Coronary Bypass Surgery and Angioplasty

An unexpected variable—geography—can affect which of two heart procedures patients are given to treat blocked blood vessels in the heart. It may seem odd, but where people live can greatly influence whether they receive coronary bypass surgery or instead undergo a procedure known as angioplasty, which often involves implanting a stent, Sarah Baldauf reports. Both procedures aim to increase blood flow to the heart, but they are not interchangeable. Coronary bypass surgery is far more invasive and carries greater risks than angioplasty, in which doctors thread a catheter tipped with a tiny balloon into a narrowed vessel and, in many cases, use a stent on the end of the catheter to prop open the vessel.

But angioplasty is not without risk. Relative to bypass surgery, it's more likely to require follow-up procedures. Patients who are considering either procedure should first understand all the risks and benefits of both; too many patients get only limited information about one procedure or the other. (For some people, there are other alternatives—including optimizing medication and lifestyle changes.)

Read U.S. News's story Heart Health: Coronary Bypass Surgery or Angioplasty? to help you decide which may be right for you. Also, here is a list of the top 10 cities where coronary bypass surgery outpaces angioplasty—and vice versa.

—January W. Payne

Other Popular Articles From USNews.com

phentermine 27.5

4H7ZUI I bookmarked this link. Thank you for good job!

phentermine 27.5 of KS @ Aug 02, 2009 11:02:17 AM

Qoscsrty

RpsjcR

Qoscsrty of MD @ Jul 14, 2009 23:10:46 PM

Causality (cont.)

I believe the scientific and medical communities have done a great disservice by not including anecdotal evidence in their case studies, and may even be ignored purposely. There are countless parents out there with heart-wrenching stories and first-hand evidence that falls on deaf ears, because they are one of those "radical" people against vaccinations. Doctors do not log this information because they don't believe it can happen. Just because scientists cannot replicate experimental data does not mean we discredit entire studies. Unfortunately, there is little pure objectivity out there. It has been estimated that only 1 in 10 vaccination related "brain damage" cases is officially diagnosed and entered into the system. Most cases are not bad enough to get the "autism" or other label and logged, or are misdiagnosed. Then again, there are so many labels out there that the data is watered down. Again, the causes are never determined. I know of many parents who have stated: "I just know they (vaccines) did something to my child!"

If you are interested in understanding possible causality, check this:

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/pages/the-danger-of-excessive-vaccination-during-brain-development.aspx

Mainstream doctors and scientists continually discredit the loads of research and evidence in this area, but cannot provide science backed causality themselves. Who can you believe? I am not against vaccinations in themselves, but how they are being administered as well as the propaganda around how they are safe and effective. There is no long term evidence that vaccines are safe and effective for everyone. If the risks/benefits were honestly explained to you, you would not get them for your child. You would, at minimum, wait until your child matured. The risks are reduced after a child starts maturing.

The real problem is there are government and social agendas already in place, and will not be changed easily. Proponents of mandatory mass vaccinations only view this problem at a macro scale: it appears to stop endemics and epidemics. Short of our children falling over dead in the clinics, there will be no change. For proponents, the end justifies the means. They expect some percentage of casualties as a result of these programs. Otherwise, they wouldn't have the vaccination court and VAERS vaccine side effect data logging site. It is all for the perceived "greater good". The drug companies love it because they won't be sued! We are living in the new world order, folks. Get used to it.

SteveK of WI @ Feb 16, 2009 17:34:23 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

U.S. News Rankings & Research

Best Hospitals

See the best hospitals, and the best children's hospitals, in specialties from cancer to urology.

Best Health Plans

U.S. News and NCQA review over 700 health insurance plans in the Best Health Plan rankings.

Best Nursing Homes

The Best Nursing Homes rankings feature data on 15,000-plus homes. Search for one near you.

Diseases & Conditions

Get information on preventing, treating, and managing diseases and conditions. Centers:

advertisement

Sponsored Poll

What factor do you think is responsible for the majority of teen-driving crashes?

View Results

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!