The Partisan Battle Over For-Profit Education

The Republican-led House will benefit the for-profit education industry but Democrats have leverage.

February 7, 2011 RSS Feed Print

When Republicans seized control of the United States House of Representatives in last November's elections, there was wide speculation that it was a victory for the for-profit education industry. Analysts understood that a Republican House would likely stand in the way of legislation calling for the type of stringent regulations commonly advocated by several Democratic lawmakers.

Sen. Tom Harkin, Democrat from Iowa and chairman of the Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, held a series of high-profile hearings in 2010, accusing for-profit schools (many of which are predominantly online universities like the University of Phoenix, Kaplan University, and Strayer University) of abusing taxpayer-funded federal student loan dollars for the sake of their bottom lines.

Sector analysts are confident that any standalone legislation calling for further regulation of the for-profit education industry from Harkin and allies in the Senate won't carry as much momentum as it might have in 2010. "I don't think that any legislation that's proposed by Harkin or Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) has any chance even of making it out of the Senate, much less getting through the House," says Trace Urdan, a for-profit education analyst and managing director at investment bank Signal Hill Capital. 

[Learn more about online education.] 

While Democrats hoping to further regulate the for-profit education industry may not be able to pass sweeping legislation, they do have a significant amount of leverage thanks to an exemption critical to for-profit schools that expires in July. The schools are currently exempt from a rule that requires at least 10 percent of their revenue to come from sources outside of federal aid. Most major for-profit schools rely on the exemption for survival and will need an extension, or else they'll be forced to raise tuition prices and risk running afoul of new gainful employment regulations designed to keep the cost of college commiserate with potential earnings, analysts say. 

Jarrel Price, an analyst and vice president at research firm Height Analytics feels Senate Democrats, who could stand in the way of this extension, will ultimately concede to the industry because schools like the University of Phoenix, which boasts more than 380,000 students according to the Department of Education, are "too big to fail." However, Democrats won't concede without making demands of their own, knowing that many for-profit schools would falter without an extension. "Tom Harkin will demand his pound of flesh," says Urdan. What that regulatory pound of flesh might be, is unclear, both analysts say. 

[Read about last year's government crackdown on for-profit schools.] 

Democratic lawmakers have pushed for regulation in hopes of benefiting consumers like Shannon Croteau, who wanted her husband, a truck driver, to scale back his working hours so he could spend more time with her and their three children. However, if he reduced his hours, she knew she would have to go back to school to earn a job that would pay enough to make ends meet. She enrolled in a Kaplan University Online program in paralegal studies in 2008 in the hopes of boosting her income. She claims Kaplan recruiters told her that the program was accredited, but maintains that before she could finish her degree she learned that the program wasn't accredited in her home state—New Hampshire—and that she amassed more than $30,000 in student loan debt with no degree to show for it. "Financially, it's a huge, huge impact because now [my husband] has got to work even harder," she says. "[Plus], I couldn't walk into a paralegal's office right now and do what they're supposed to do." 

Kaplan maintains that Croteau's plight is of her own making because of prior debts. "This student incurred a significant part of her debt before she enrolled at Kaplan University, and she reached her federal loan limit," according to a Kaplan University statement. "Although Kaplan cannot forgive loans to the federal government, we have forgiven her financial obligations to Kaplan. As we do with all students, we have tried to work with her to allow her to complete her degree, but she has resisted all of our efforts." 

Tags:
colleges,
student loans,
students,
debt,
online education

Reader Comments Read all comments (17)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Here you go

Kelly of NY 7:26AM April 23, 2012

All schools should operate without federal funding. If for profit online education is really just a clever diploma mill in disguise, than traditional students who go to "real schools" should also have no problem repaying money - let all schools fund it that way.

The college i work at does not accept any federal funding (not even Pell grants) and they are still standing.

Back to for profit schools like UoP and the likes, here's one "diploma mill" graduate who did pretty good for getting a ramshackle education. ---> Howard Schmidt.

It is my personal belief that all education should have to meet the same standards, be it brick and mortar or distance education. But i also believe that the student can make the education, and not always the other way around. It seems like ‘online only’ education is the new ‘state school’ in regards to it being a second class education. I am not saying University of Phoenix graduates are going to compete head to head with Ivy League schools - but i am saying an education inherent is not entirely able to assess alumni’s credentials on the school’s merits alone, the student has to do that part.

David of PA 1:40AM May 01, 2011

Important facts to keep in mind.

* for-profits are often more regulated than your free to do as you please no/unequal standards to meet community/public college

* for-profits often roll the majority of student costs into a stated tuition and fee schedule where as community colleges fee you to death

* for-profits often aren't eligible for the state grants you pay for public colleges

* for-profits don't sit on free and/or tax-free city land

* while there may be some bad apples, you cannot lump all for-profits into one "evil" group

* for-profits pay lots of taxes and fees that help your local economy and employ a number of upstanding citzens

* a lot of students owe huge amounts because they borrow in excess of their college costs because the government requires that a student be able to borrow up to the "cost of attendance" which is more than just fees associated with the cost of school (includes elements for standard costs of living, transportation, food, etc.). For example, some students receive $2000 per month for "living expenses" and opt not to work, whose fault is that?

* some students don't make the minimum payment on their private loans and don't contact the lender and are therefore placed in a highter interest rate because those terms are outlined in the loan agreement, it's not that a student coulnd't have done something about it, it's because they failed to.

Carlie of IL 12:54PM April 11, 2011

Search Online Programs

Or use our Degree Finder

advertisement

Knowledge Centers

Looking at colleges? Find out what you need to know.

Parent Question-of-the-Day

What will be your primary resource to help pay for college?
[ View Results ]

Advance your career with an online degree