The Paper Trail

NCAA Tournament Expansion ‘Probable’

March 31, 2010 RSS Feed Print

Because the NCAA is all about ruining a good thing (in Paper Trail's humble opinion), it seems as if the NCAA Tournament is headed for expansion. Yes, the marvelous three-weekend event that warms our hearts, fills our minds, and slashes our production seems to be headed toward some form of growth and extension.

Big Ten Commissioner Jim Delany says the famed tournament's bloating from 65 to 96 teams is "probable," USA Today reports. With the push to expand gaining some serious steam, the tournament field—and its schedule—will drastically change.

The NCAA plans to discuss the matter in late April. The NCAA has an 11-year, $6 billion television contract with CBS, but an opt-out clause allows the NCAA to explore its options and possibly break the deal. With networks like ESPN and others happy to show the approximately 7,000 games that would come out of expansion, it makes financial sense for the NCAA to expand.

Oregon State University President Ed Ray, who is on the committee that will discuss expansion, wasn't as eager to address expansion's likelihood.

"Conventional wisdom must be that it's not impossible. Otherwise, I don't know why we'd have it scheduled for discussion," Ray tells the USA Today. "But I have absolutely no sense (of) whether it's probable or not."

[See our March Madness coverage.]

Searching for a college? Get our complete rankings of America's Best Colleges.

Tags:
NCAA,
colleges

Reader Comments Read all comments (9)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

If the best 65 teams were in the tourney then I would say leave it alone. We have the best 45-50 teams and them the rest. Making it a 96 team field would have the best 65 + teams. This is why I' min favor of the change!

Sean Stewart of NV 10:46PM April 16, 2010

Expansion is good. If today's 16 seed is converted to a 24 seed next year, that same team is more likely to beat a 9 seed than a 1 seed. Initially, 9 vs 24 may not brings lots of eyeballs to the tv screen. But then again, how many people actually watches 1 vs 16? Once a 24 beats a 9, or a 23 beats a 10, the networks will hype the upset potentials and viewership and overall interest in the first round games will increase. Bottom line, if we keep the status quo, is 16 Lehigh more deserving than Mississippi or Dayton, who barely missed the NCAAs this year?

Elijah of CA 3:29PM April 08, 2010

The more I think about this the more I think it is a ridiculous idea. As other people have said, if there is expansion to 96 teams, why even bother with a regular season at all? There won't be any suspense of seeing tournament-like caliber games in the early part of the season non-conference games. Then conferences like the Big East would have like all 16 schools in the tournament or something ridiculous like that.

Compared to the BCS for college football, which I abhor, the 65-team tournament with a bracket to fill-out is one of the most exciting and fun to follow sporting events every year. If there's 96 teams to deal with, I'm sorry it just won't be any fun.

And again, why bother with a regular season. I just don't agree with this at all.

Rebecca Jill of NC 11:04AM April 08, 2010

The Paper Trail

Nobody knows a college better than its student newspaper. And nobody knows campus newspapers better than this blog. We sift through thousands of student newspaper headlines every day to bring you the latest, most important, or just plain weirdest news from campuses across the country. Heard bigger news or a crazier story? Send tips to papertrail@usnews.com.