The Paper Trail

Mixed Emotions at Texas Christian, Boise State, and Cincinnati

December 7, 2009 RSS Feed Print

Death, taxes, and anti-BCS rhetoric: Those are the things we've come to expect in life. And so, after college football bowl announcements came out Sunday, the public outcry against the Bowl Championship Series system that decides the national championship reached its usual rancor.

Three undefeated teams—Texas Christian University, Boise State University, and the University of Cincinnati—will not have a shot at the national title. That's not to take away from two deserving undefeated schools—the University of Texas and the University of Alabama—that will play in the national championship, but reactions to the bowl announcements at the three schools that missed out were mixed.

"It's a shame that you can't settle [the title] on the field," TCU Athletic Director Chris Del Conte tells the New York Times. "We settled our portion on the field."

Big East Associate Commissioner for Football Nick Carparelli Jr. tells the Times something similar: "I certainly think you could make a case that Cincinnati should be playing Alabama for the national championship. The way that the system works, Alabama and Texas were at the top of the polls from Day 1. The patterns in which voters vote make it virtually impossible to get ahead of either of those two teams in the polls."

Cincinnati, which won the Big East's bid to a BCS bowl on Saturday, did not start the season in the Associated Press Top 25. Boise State was No. 14 in the AP preseason poll, and TCU was 17. Breaking past Texas and Alabama, which were Nos. 2 and 5, respectively, to start the season, was basically impossible.

Despite the complaints, the show must go on. On January 7, top-ranked Alabama and No. 2 Texas will kick off in Pasadena, Calif. And the debate surrounding college football's system to decide its champion will continue for another year.

Tags:
University of Cincinnati,
Texas Christian University,
college athletics,
Boise State University,
colleges

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Boise State and TCU didnt get there BCS game they deserve, The hole point of the BCS bowls is to have a non AQ school get into a BCS game and to play a Big school and have there shot at the national spot light to prove they can play with the big boys !

But what the BCS did this year putting the 2 non AQ schools in the same bowl is a copout they do not want to BCS school lossing to good non AQ programs, If they wanted to see 2 undefeated school play in a non championship game they could have matched up TCU/BSU with Cici, but they did not. Its a shame that BSU and TCU got there spot light shot out by the BCS! All I have to say is shame on the BCS for sweeping these teams under the rug and turing there back on them.

Luke of ID 2:10PM December 08, 2009

Its funny because I don't think that Florda deserves to play against U.C in the Sugar Bowl. I would have much rather seen them playing against Texas Christian, Florida has lost a game the top 4 teams in the country didn't.. If you base all the BCS games on coaches opinion Texas would not be playing for a national tital right now. U.C came into the season unranked but now that reg. season has come to a close they are higher than they've ever been at #3 in the counrty That deserves a much better bowl game and better team. Preferably an undefeated one. But we are U.C we will take what you'll give us. Do't get it mixed up Florida is a great team, but U.C is ready to play no matter the conference, team, or player. Tim Tebow will always come out with his best game an so will Tony Pike. I don't even need to speak for Marty Gilyard. He has been a complete monster this year. I'm so excited to be able to see what my team will be able to do with Florida. Go Bearcats!!!!!!!!!!!

J. White of OH 12:57PM December 08, 2009

On a neutral playing field, both teams playing well I do not think any one of the Non BCS schools could play and consistently win in any of the major conferences and could not beat either one of the two teams playing in the Title Game.

It is so easy to play through a conference schedule that includes soft teams...try playing in a conference where week after week you are playing top notch competition and still win 13 games. Most of the teams that don't win conference championships from the major conferences would be more than just a little competitive in the Mountain West, etc conferences.

I don't think for an instance that TCU, all things being equal, could play nose to nose with either Texas or Alabama.

But, as long as we have this stupid BCS, we'll never know for sure.

k mills of TX 6:02PM December 07, 2009

The Paper Trail

Nobody knows a college better than its student newspaper. And nobody knows campus newspapers better than this blog. We sift through thousands of student newspaper headlines every day to bring you the latest, most important, or just plain weirdest news from campuses across the country. Heard bigger news or a crazier story? Send tips to papertrail@usnews.com.