The Paper Trail

Controversy Over Antigay Comments at NYU

July 24, 2009 RSS Feed Print

New York University students' uproar in response to antigay statements made by a law professor from Singapore have prompted the professor to cancel her plans to teach at the university this fall, the Chronicle of Higher Education reports.

Li-ann Thio intended to teach two courses as a visiting professor at NYU's law school—one on human rights in Asia and another on constitutionalism there. But when NYU students and graduates learned that she opposes repealing a Singaporean law that criminalizes sex between men, they began protesting her appointment. She also supports Singapore's imposition of a fine on a television station that depicted a gay couple and their child as a family unit and has generally denounced homosexuality in several public statements.

More than 750 members of the NYU community had signed an online petition that states that by hiring Thio, the law school is "acting in opposition of its own policy of nondiscrimination and undermining its commitment to advancing human rights worldwide." In a statement published Wednesday evening by the New York Times, Law School Dean Richard Revesz says that Thio told him she was "disappointed by what she called the atmosphere of hostility by some members of our community towards her views and by the low enrollment in her classes."

The dean also says that the law school did not know of Thio's controversial remarks when it selected her as a visiting professor. However, the dean says, if it had known, this fact alone would not necessarily have persuaded the law school not to offer Thio the visiting professorship because colleges and universities "benefit greatly from a diversity of perspectives, not from hiring only people who share the same views."

Tags:
NYU,
colleges,
gay rights

Reader Comments Read all comments (30)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Stephen of WI, your arguments are weak and unfounded.

You claim that homosexuals are unnatural because of their inability to reproduce. Under this premise, are women who are infertile or men who are sterile also unnatural?

You also say that "we" argue that being pro-gay is acceptable, but not anti-gay. Have you thought about that argument? Should we hire professors who aren't racist, or is that being prejudice against racist people?

It's fine to have a different view than us liberals, but if you're going to make an argument, make sure it makes some kind of sense before you present it.

David of OR 2:58PM August 08, 2009

In response to the comments from Eric of Alabama and Stephen of Wisconsin, I would just like to point out that NYU, located in Manhattan, has one of the largest gay student populations in the country. It would be plainly illogical for a university like NYU to hire someone whose published work is severely offensive to a large segment of the student body. Perhaps they can hire professors who are bigots at universities in Alabama or Wisconisn, but at NYU it might cause riots.

It's evident that people from poorer and less sophisticated areas of the US, like Mr. Holland from Alabama, tend to champion their ignorance, hatred, and bigotry. It Manhattan, however, we do not.

Anthony of NY 5:13PM August 01, 2009

recent costs different 180 reviews last climate

sunnyberge of DC 11:31AM August 01, 2009

The Paper Trail

Nobody knows a college better than its student newspaper. And nobody knows campus newspapers better than this blog. We sift through thousands of student newspaper headlines every day to bring you the latest, most important, or just plain weirdest news from campuses across the country. Heard bigger news or a crazier story? Send tips to papertrail@usnews.com.