The Paper Trail

Top Schools See Growth in Investments

September 26, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (1)

We already knew about Harvard's 8.6 percent return on investment (and 6 percent growth in its endowment) over the past year, but other schools have reported relatively sluggish numbers. Not surprisingly, most of the top schools saw decent returns (as much as anyone could hope in this economy), while less prominent schools struggled.

Stanford earned a "hard-fought" 6.2 percent on its investments, hedging against weak credit markets and bulking up on oil and gas. Its endowment stands at $20.4 billion.

Yale saw a 4.5 percent return, earning $400 million (short of Harvard's $651 million earnings) and boosting its endowment to $22.9 billion.

MIT reports it managed a 3.2 percent return over the past year. Its endowment totals $10.1 billion.

While these elite schools had gotten accustomed to double-digit increases, few are complaining about the slow growth. Things could be worse, like at schools where any increase would be welcome.

Rice University lost $60 million, or 1.5 percent, from its $4.67 billion endowment.

The University of Pennsylvania saw a 3.9 percent drop in its endowment, which is valued at $6.3 billion. Penn State lost 1.9 percent in the market, dropping its endowment to $1.6 billion.

The University of Connecticut's $400 million endowment lost $32 million in public investments this year (down 5.5 percent). The school was especially hard hit by a 17 percent loss in real estate.

Now, what's that saying about what the rich and poor keep getting?

Tags:
investing,
college endowments

Reader Comments Read all comments (1)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The article you cited regarding the University of Connecticut’s endowment performance during the past year contained inaccuracies and misstatements that need to be corrected.

The University did not lose $32 million on our public market investments as you state. The down market did negatively impact our investments, with the result that our portfolio lost 5.5 percent for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008. At the close of 2007, we reported an endowment value of $335 million, and in June of this year that figure was $317 million. So we did suffer an $18 million loss for the year–but not the $32 million stated in the article.

Another inaccuracy arises from citing an overall endowment value of $400 million. The University’s total endowment on June 30 was $329.4 million, including the investment pool mentioned above and $12.4 million in University endowment assets under management by the Foundation.

We would also point out that the 17 percent drop in our public real estate investments actually represents a very small portion of the portfolio. While our public market investments were lower, we actually gained 10 percent from our private real estate investments during the year. The result is that overall our real estate portfolio was down just 10 percent, compared to a global 20 percent reduction across the industry as a whole.

We don’t know if you are typically in the habit of issuing clarifications to your posts, but felt it was necessary to correct a number of the mistakes made by the original student reporter in compiling his article.

Thanks for your consideration.

Arthur Sorrentino of CT 4:49PM October 20, 2008

The Paper Trail

Nobody knows a college better than its student newspaper. And nobody knows campus newspapers better than this blog. We sift through thousands of student newspaper headlines every day to bring you the latest, most important, or just plain weirdest news from campuses across the country. Heard bigger news or a crazier story? Send tips to papertrail@usnews.com.

advertisement