Title IX Takes On Science

Federal agencies like the National Science Foundation, NASA, and the Department of Energy have quietly launched several Title IX compliance reviews in university science and engineering programs since 2006, leading some to question the impact the anti-gender discrimination law could have on departments that have traditionally been dominated by men. The New York Times reports that under pressure from Congress, investigators have been taking lab inventories and interviewing science and engineering faculty members at schools such as Columbia, the University of Wisconsin, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and the University of Maryland, all of which receive federal grants.

The investigation has stirred up criticism that a heavy-handed approach to Title IX could lead to much-feared quota systems. And although women have made significant gains in science and engineering (women are about half of medical students, 60 percent of biology majors, and 70 percent of psychology Ph.D.'s.), Title IX advocates still believe that the presence of obstacles like unconscious bias and a shortage of role models and mentors continue to plague women's progress.

In the meantime, the federal probes have not led to any new policies or requirements for gender balance, but administrators dealing with new mounds of paperwork and interviews have called the reviews, among other things, a "complete waste of time."

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts

Comment Name State Select One AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE DC FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY International Email

Please enter the two words below into the text field underneath the image.

Incorrect please try again

Enter the words above: Enter the numbers you hear:

Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.