The Paper Trail

Yale Student Turns (Maybe) Abortions Into Art Project

April 18, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (19)

In Wednesday's issue, the Yale Daily News featured the grisly details of a senior art project by Aliza Shvarts, a Yale art student who, over the course of nine months, artificially inseminated herself multiple times while also trying to induce miscarriages.

The story quickly spread across the Internet and was picked up by Drudge Report, which temporarily felled the Yale Daily News website. Its proliferation across the Web caused an unsurprising amount of shock and disgust, summed up well by the IvyGate blog: "I think I saw this, once. In a horrible, horrible nightmare."

The problem? It's a hoax. Or wait. Maybe it's not.

Confusion reigned after the Yale public relations office posted a notice on its site that said, "She stated to three senior Yale University officials today, including two deans, that she did not impregnate herself and that she did not induce any miscarriages. The entire project is an art piece, a creative fiction designed to draw attention to the ambiguity surrounding form and function of a woman's body."

Shvarts, however, disputes the school's claim, saying she has no idea whether she was ever impregnated and whether she ever actually miscarried. "No one can say with 100-percent certainty that anything in the piece did or did not happen. The nature of the piece is that it did not consist of certainties."

Shortly after that statement, the school responded, saying that the art student had motivation to make that statement. "Her denial is part of her performance," wrote the school's spokeswoman. "We are disappointed that she would deliberately lie to the press in the name of art."

Back to Shvarts: "I'm not going to absolve [the university] by saying it was some sort of hoax when it wasn't. I started out with the University on board with what I was doing, and because of the media frenzy they've been trying to dissociate with me."

So what's the truth? No one knows, so I guess that's the point. But one thing's certain—people are up in arms about the whole thing. Plus, it surely made a visit from their Ivy League brethren all the more timely: The Harvard Task Force on the Arts came to New Haven Monday to study the school's dedication to the arts. "Yale has for a long time had a very deep and serious engagement with the arts," said a task force member. "It is a model for how a university can take arts-making seriously."

Tags:
Yale University,
abortion

Reader Comments Read all comments (19)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

--ABOMINTAIONS ASIDE --

we're STILL waiting for a single, honest, potent, cautionary

tale from the PC 'conscience' crowd ---dealing with the psychic

toll extermination of the unborn takes on single women

---LATER in life...

Hagar Wren of NY 9:14PM April 14, 2010

Hell. that was a short conversation... I guess Death performances have moved to a higher plane...

Mark A Gallegos of CA 8:44PM April 29, 2008

Ethics is the means towards achieving Humanity…

It is essential to understanding the Creative Process and the limits to human creativity. What you fail to see is that, without ethic, Art cannot exist (the words we share in this would not exist), to say that I am "becoming part of the “piece" is to censor the intent of my participation in this conversation, and imposes the conclusion that "the piece" is appreciated simply because I addressing the controversy she is attempting to “provoke”. One might consider this reverse-censorship, but a censor none the less.

Scott, I see that you hole a degree in Fine Arts, as do I; however, though we share an academic understanding of the fundamental logic behind Aliza’s application of the Arts, it is wrong to conclude that I recognize the same in her conclusions. I am not so easily “provoked”. Her inability to express her POV with sincerity, commitment and integrity only leads me to conclude that she has no real POV in this matter and nothing tangible to share (on this occasion) with humanity,

It is not my intent to address her “work” as that of “art”, it is my intent to participate in the “Art” of conversation to promote a POV that her behavior is a true example of the destructive nature of human creativity, and is not conducive to that which is understood to be Art.

As for censorship in this forum; “all comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.” Ethics are as inevitable as the Art we choose to embrace. I challenge the precept that “Art” has no definition simply because the Human POV is in a constant state of flux; and surely, failing to discover or define does not prove that something doesn’t exist, failure is a measure of our willingness to continue in the pursuit of that thing… in this case that thing is “The Ethics of Art”.

In conclusion, my commitment to discovering Art is relentless; I am an Artist. Anything short of that dishonors the lives of the countless Artists who paved the road in search of enlightenment in the pursuit of Art and Humanity. The first question we must answer in this pursuit of Art is; what is “Art”?

Mark A Gallegos, B. F. A

Marc34me@live.com

Mark Gallegos of 5:22PM April 23, 2008

The Paper Trail

Nobody knows a college better than its student newspaper. And nobody knows campus newspapers better than this blog. We sift through thousands of student newspaper headlines every day to bring you the latest, most important, or just plain weirdest news from campuses across the country. Heard bigger news or a crazier story? Send tips to papertrail@usnews.com.

advertisement