The Paper Trail

President’s Dismissal Riles William and Mary

February 20, 2008 RSS Feed Print

The College of William and Mary presidential saga of last week lives on, as students, faculty, and its Board of Visitors members continue to discuss (and then some) that controversial ouster, the Flat Hat reports. Most recently, the student newspaper reports a board member is resigning because he was one of several board members who supported a contract renewal for former president Gene Nichol.

The resignation is just the latest in a tumultuous week at William and Mary. The campus has dealt with vulgar anti-Board of Visitors graffiti, seemingly endless meetings and debate, rallies, angry websites, and even a little school-song singing.

Supporters of the dismissal say the move was "based principally on an objective and very thorough review of performance as an executive," as opposed to "politics or ideological considerations." But Nichol insists, in an E-mail written to the entire student body, that his dismissal can be attributed to the controversy surrounding his removal of "the Wren cross, his refusal to ban the Sex Workers' Art Show, his support of the college's Gateway Program, and his commitment to diversity."

Whoever you think is right on this one, there's no doubt that emotions are running wild on campus: "I feel deeply the pain, and it's terribly important that people have the opportunity to express that—their anger, their frustration," said the school's provost. "What we need to do is honor the things that Gene Nichol stood for."

Tags:
College of William and Mary

Reader Comments Read all comments (6)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

So the posters who oppose Ms. Go calling their precious websites "angry" come on this site and, well, angrily post that she's an idiot. Extremely mature, everyone.

Thanks for providing a realistic outsider perspective. When people are so insulated in their world, they don't realize how ridiculous they look to the rest of us.

Freddy of VA 12:38PM March 17, 2009

As a professional journalist, you should be aware that 1) understanding the meanings of words and 2) checking your facts before you publish them are generally considered important facets of writing for a professional publication.

1) The website you call "angry" in your news story is arguably the most mature and LEAST angry student-run effort on campus since Nichol's resignation. If these people were angry, they wouldn't be employing diction like "honest, open, inclusive, and positive," as mentioned in the comment above.

2) There is no way that anyone who had read a single sentence posted on that website would have published that incredibly incorrect conclusion. Please do a tiny bit of work before you write an article for U.S. News & World Report again.

Kelley Quinn of VA 11:18PM February 21, 2008

Alison Go should read TribeUnited.com's values as stated on their site:

- Fostering an honest, open, inclusive, and positive campus dialogue

- Government transparency and community participation in the direction of the College

- Productive activism geared towards gaining a greater voice in the process.

Sounds anything but angry.

Brian Cannon of VA 2:57PM February 21, 2008

The Paper Trail

Nobody knows a college better than its student newspaper. And nobody knows campus newspapers better than this blog. We sift through thousands of student newspaper headlines every day to bring you the latest, most important, or just plain weirdest news from campuses across the country. Heard bigger news or a crazier story? Send tips to papertrail@usnews.com.