On Education

Aspiring Teachers Flunk Math Test

May 22, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (18)

Almost three quarters of aspiring elementary-school teachers in Massachusetts have failed a new math section of the state's licensing exam—the first time teaching candidates' knowledge of the subject has been assessed on a separate test. Administered in March, the new assessment—which includes questions on geometry, statistics, and probability—is the result of efforts to raise standards in a subject in which, until now, teachers were not necessarily required to excel.

Mitchell Chester, the state's commissioner of elementary and secondary education, says the new assessment makes Massachusetts the first state to approve a math-specific test for elementary licensure, as opposed to a multiple-subject exam yielding a single composite score, as is common in most states.

In light of the high failure rate—only about 27 percent of the 600 teaching candidates who took the test passed it—and the state's critical shortage of special education teachers, a temporary measure has been enacted that allows those who just missed the mark on the math section to still obtain teaching licenses. The teachers then have five years to retake and pass the test.

The debate over the test results' significance is raising some sticky issues in Massachusetts education circles. But at a time when so many other states are lowering their standards in an effort to avoid sanctions and loss of federal funds under the No Child Left Behind law, the Bay State's effort to buck the trend is commendable. But making the licensure requirements harder is one thing. Producing teachers who can pass the tests—and lay the foundation for students' knowledge in the building blocks of mathematics—is another.

Tags:
education,
math,
teachers,
Massachusetts

Reader Comments Read all comments (18)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I used to be a whiz kid in high school math. Now I am over 50 and going back to get my teacher certification. I am afraid of the basic problems in statistics and proability.

Can someone reccomend a good web site or good basic Algebra book that shows "step-by-step" reasoning to figure out any problem in these areas?

Also, I only took Chemistry in College and not Earth Science or Biology> Help!

Thanks,

Teacher Fears Standardized Texes Exam

Teacher to be after 40 years of TX 1:11PM February 13, 2010

"I feel pretty safe in assuming geometry and statistics are NOT being taught in Elementary (grade 5 and lower)."

Yes, they are. A lot of geometry is taught at the elementary level. Perimeters, diameters, angles, etc. are typically taught in 3rd to 4th grade. Statistics aren't taught as a separate area of math but do come up a lot.

JC of CA 1:47PM July 20, 2009

I agree teachers should be able to break things down and teach things step by step. However, should ELEMENTARY teachers need to pass a standardized test for information NOT TAUGHT IN ELEMENTARY school? I'm from MA originally, and while times have changed and more is being asked of our children earlier, I feel pretty safe in assuming geometry and statistics are NOT being taught in Elementary (grade 5 and lower). How much was wasted studying this issue, devising a test and debating the issue? While there are precursors for these subjects in elementary school, I doubt the test was on the names of typical geometric shapes or ratios of one color of discs in a bag of so many other colors. These are how these precursors are taught at the elementary level. Maybe what we are now seeing is the last "improvement" to teaching coming to fruition. 25 years or so there as a big move to "new math", as well as non-phonics based reading programs. "Time-savers" they called them back then. In the long run, more kids needed more time to grasp what they would have grasped the old way...in some cases...they never grasped it, as the first poster testified. These teachers that now have 5 years to learn the required material and retake the test surely wouldn't consider it a time-saver, if in fact the change contributed to the issue. I am only speculating, but I think it bears consideration that going back to the tried and true is sometimes a progressive attitude, especially if what was "fixed" was never broken to begin with.

D.Crosby of TX 9:30AM June 15, 2009

On Education

Report cards may come out only twice a year, but education news happens every day. Here is where U.S. News writers grade the latest developments, from school districts banning the game of tag to congressional debates that affect college affordability. Check regularly for the most recent updates.

advertisement