Los Angeles Looks at Firing Teachers

Reader Comments

Back to blog

Yes, tenure needs to be tougher, but it also must mean something. Here we are 3 years laterand we see that bad teachers are actually protected by administration, which is protected y school officials, which also conceal serious offenses like that of George Hernandez, Mark Berndt and Mr. Chapel according to allegations. Before the Miramonte Scandal Steve Rooney, Marlo Duffin and others established the fact that LAUSD his the worst culprits by buying them off, transferring them or just plain ignoring the fact they were harming kids.

I am sure Ms. Collins i tentions are pure but Deasy was not very specific when he issued a directive to administrators: fire those teachers!

So what we face now is a free for all where LAUSD and theboard are ignoring protocol and rubber stamping teachers through when many arewhistleblowers, victims of reprisals and targeted because they have cases in the WC court , DFEH , etc.

I suggest the district put these cases in check or eventually it will cost LAUSD a great deal of money. These cases are agregious miscarriages of justice. Yes, let's fire teachers who are unfit or incompetent( that test is a woefully inadequate method and as I explained, too many administrators are not objective). We do have to do these correctly . Mr. Vladovich is right, so please go back and check yourselves.

Rene Diedrich of CA 1:22AM July 27, 2012

The article states that only "31 teachers across the state have lost their jobs after administrative hearings." This is extremely misleading. The vast majority of teachers do not fight dismissal proceedings and so they quit without going through a hearing. Only those teachers with strong cases proceed to a hearing.

blackturtle.us of CA 1:30PM June 04, 2009

My opinion is very basic. Take care of your own before sending money to foreign countries. There are young, bright, ehtusiastic, unafraid of a challenge teachers that are being released from their teaching positions because of budget cuts. It upsets me to read an article that "Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton announced on Tuesday that the United States will give Pakistan more than $100 million in humanitarian aid to help people displaced by recent fighting." Give that support to our education system. Class sizes will grow, eager and enthusiastic teachers will be lost and the education of our students will stagnate. This is a truly grim future for our country.

Paula Arii of CA 3:54PM May 19, 2009

I think that the school board is not looking after the best interest of the childrens. The firing means larger classroom, the teacher has less time to see if the student understand what he/she is trying to get across. Also how can you get new blood in the teaching field when it is the newer teacher that are geting fired. LAUSD lets get your act together!!!

Larry Shimokaji of CA 3:24PM May 08, 2009

As long as the performance review isn't written by the guy you play golf with; firing ought to be based on more substantial criteria than that (and in my experience, it's usually not). You need objective criteria; these are tough calls. And heaven knows the Boards of Education are probably the most political entities in existence. Fire THEM.

Alan Wells MS, MBA of TN 4:31PM May 05, 2009

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Back to blog

On Education

Report cards may come out only twice a year, but education news happens every day. Here is where U.S. News writers grade the latest developments, from school districts banning the game of tag to congressional debates that affect college affordability. Check regularly for the most recent updates.

advertisement