Will Kids Spend More Time in the Classroom?

Reader Comments

Back to blog

President Obama merely said that he thinks it good for students to spend more time in school, not that he's trying to import their system wholesale.

http://briandeutsch.blogspot.com/2009/03/obama-didnt-say-what-you-thought-he.html

Brian 8:14AM April 14, 2009

I would like to comment on Nate Peele's comments. I current live and teach in South Korea and being close to the system, I can say that I have no desire to replicate it in the United States. First, education is stuffed down the throats of children from an early age. Instead of playing sports after school, students often attend as much as six extra hours of classes in a day. School is also compulsory on many Saturdays. I understand that in order to get ahead you have to study smarter (not harder) than the other person. In Korea, however, many of these hagwons offer low quality education. They are businesses that hire untrained teachers who will work for the smallest salary offered. In English hagwons, language is usually learned through memorization and repetition. Many students have a large vocabulary but have trouble constructing a sentence.

Also, there is a limit to how much school a child can handle. After awhile, any one of us would shut down.

Furthermore, student behavior is not any better in Korea than in the states and is sometimes worse. Hitting a student 200 times does not instill a love of learning or a healthy respect for the school. If anything, it causes behind the back rebellions and inspires acts of revenge.

Basically, South Korea has an enormous quantity of education, but little quality. Multiple choice tests are the norm, but get a Korean student away from a standardized test and they often have a tough time. I understand that U.S. schools have gotten lax in their education and their standards, but I do not endorse a broad acceptance of the South Korean education system.

Nathan Price 7:50AM April 09, 2009

How about parents who has to work 5 days a week, 9 hrs a day? If there is a husband and wife in a household , one party may take on the responsibility of taking one day off per week. How about if it is a single parent household? And not many companies have a 4 days work per week. And not to forget the spring break, summer break, fall break and winter break.

Mama Mia of CA 1:03PM March 24, 2009

During a speech last week, Barrack Obama reminded us that South Korean students go to school a month longer than our students do. After looking up the statistics, I learned that they are also scoring better on standardized tests than our students even though we have a higher percentage of students scoring in the highest category. I decided that we need to look at what it will take to replicate the South Korean educational miracle.

First, we need the kind of quality teachers that they have in South Korea. First, all teachers in this country should get a 75% raise so that they are equal to South Korean teachers in salary as a percentage of GDP. I’m not thrilled about this aspect of things either because a teacher who is currently overpaid at $40,000 a year would now make $70,000. Wow! OK, let’s just skip this step.

One thing that South Korea has that we need is hagwons. Hagwons are private tutoring schools that students go to after their regular school day is completed. South Korean families spend 7 percent of their income on their children’s education and that’s for students in public school. Student days in South Korea are much longer with both school and hagwon taking up time. It isn’t unusual for students to catch up on their shut eye in class. The saying in Korea is, “Sleep 5 hours and fail. Sleep 4 hours and pass.” Especially in high school, students routinely begin school at 6 a.m. and spend the day in classes until midnight. This schedule lasts 7 days a week.

Students in South Korea know that they have a lot pressure to succeed and unfortunately, there is an abnormally high suicide rate among teens and children in South Korea. However, the schools know that if they need to instill discipline they still can. 80% of schools in South Korean still employ corporal punishment. There was one famous story in 2006 when a teacher hit a student 200 times for being 5 minutes late for class. You can be sure that student was on time the next day. This iron willed discipline allows Korean teachers to use a curriculum that features far more rote memorization than are children can handle.

Some may argue, that this kind of approach is too costly or that it saps children of their childhoods. However, what is the effect of a childhood on a country’s economy? We need to start working to get our students capable of competing with the hard working automotons of South Korea.

http://thatsrightnate.com/2009/03/15/recreating-the-south-korean-educational-miracle-in-the-united-states/

Nate Peele of IL 9:09AM March 24, 2009

My children already take on more schoolwork than my wife and I ever did. My 6 year old and 9 year old sons have homework Monday through Thursday throughout the entire school year. I drop them off at 8:00am and pick them up at 3:00pm. We feel this is enough "schooltime" for them. There are no school buses in our town as well, the parent's cars are the buses, and I can't imagine the thought of all these parent's trying to pick up their children during rush hour around 5pm - it would be gridlock central.

They also need to be kids - that means having the time to do what they want and explore and find the things that interest them. It may be digging in the dirt and collecting rocks or planting and maintaining a vegetable garden or simply riding their bikes with their friends learning social skills. Whatever it may be, their time spent outside the classroom is just as valuable as the time spent inside it.

VR of NJ 7:49PM March 23, 2009

For example in Chicago, we have only 900 hours of instruction per academic year. That is the lowest of all large urban school districts. Most large school districts have at least 1000 hours of instruction. That is a crime. We have a large English Language population that could benefit from more quality time. We have to change with the needs of the new students.

I do not know what studies the author quotes but education week came out with an article that shows consensus that more quality time is necessary, not less.

English Language Learners can really benefit from a longer instructional day. In addition a longer day with additional teachers would enable school staff to meet regularly to plan and evaluate classroom and school wide practices. This is an area that no talks about, how to get a whole school staff in sync and developing professional teacher leadership capacity. It makes sense to build within the day and week real time to follow a process of school reform.

http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2008/09/24/05narmain_ep.h28.html&destination=http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2008/09/24/05narmain_ep.h28.html&levelId=2100

Vinicius of IL 12:47PM March 21, 2009

Switch to 4 day a week school, keep the hours roughly normal (maybe extend the day from 3pm to 3:30 or 4:00). Then spread the school weeks more evenly through the calender and all weeks--like a sort of year around school for 4 day per week schools.

You'd still have time with your kids. You'd have more time with them actually. You wouldn't have to wait until winter break or summer to do something with them, just ask off for a Friday and burn a long weekend, then save your big trips for the more medium lengthed summers and holiday breaks. No one realy needs 2 months off in summer anyways. Most teens aren't on farms and we have A/C units in out schools. Cutting the summer shorter would also reduce the time that teachers have to waste at the beging of the year reviewing and reteaching all the stuff that students forgot over the too-long break.

4 day a week school would also allow teens more flexbility to hold down a part time job during the regular school year, instead of being crunched for late shifts and weekends, or only working in the summer.

Think about it: More hours and days in school over the course of the year, but more time in your weekend to spend however the students and parents see fit.

Bryna of SC 11:04AM March 20, 2009

The problem with education has little to do with the amount of time spent in school or in the classroom. The real problem is poor classroom management and the loss of focus on mastering the state standards. More time at school will only increase spending on energy, which we should be saving. I liked the idea from NJGUARDIAN about distance learning. There are some distance learning models proven to be highly effective, and it cuts down on several costs. I can see a balance between doing this and social time. For instance, if you spend 3 days at home doing distance learning though cable television or the internet, the other two days can be used for physical education, direct writing instruction, and other subject areas requiring more facilitation by a certified teacher.

So many parents are opting for homeschooling because no one can agree where the money should be spent. President Obama advocates for additional school time, but what use is this when many teachers do not know how to manage a classroom effectively. When a teacher is instructing, there must be complete silence and attentiveness of every student or else no real learning will take place. There must be group interactions between students in class, and students must learn to teach one another. It is a proven fact that we do not really learn a subject unless we can teach it to another person.

There are also too many schools teaching to the test. There should be a system set up in every school district that teaches to mastery of state standards. What is the use of having state standards in a subject, when hardly any teachers are teaching these standards to mastery. Also, a one-size-fits-all approach to teaching does not work. Each individual must be held accountable for their own learning and progress, and must fully comprehend what standards are being taught and why. When students understand the standards they must work towards mastery, and the ones they have already mastered, then student achievement will increase tenfold.

We have all lost focus here. A longer school day does not guarantee higher achievement. It only leads to more frustration. More teachers who would rather be at home with their families are forced to stay with students they many not feel like tolerating. When the classroom culture is disruptive, then there will never be any real learning going on. There will be additional hours of madness going on inside of the classrooms. Unless the heart of the problem is cured, then there will be no solution that will fix the larger problem with nationwide low academic achievement.

Sure, China and India have longer school days. They also come from a culture which values achievement. Parents are more devoted to their children's success and businesses are investing money for future employees. Americans like to point the finger at each other, but every person in American is responsible. When was the last time you volunteered 5 or more hours a week helping a child learn to read?

Mrs. Facilitate-- http://facilitatedontdictate.blogspot.com 11:01AM March 20, 2009

First, let me tell you that when I went to school, from the 5th through 12th grades, I had to catch the school bus at 7:15 am and took a bus leaving school at 4:20 (getting me home about 5:00 pm.

The official school day was 8:15 to 3:00, but due to the distance and bus sharing, this was the schedule.

When I missed the bus, I was in trouble as it was a 3 mile walk each way.

We would eat dinner at 5:30 pm sharp and (after helping clean up) would start on what was usually 4 hours of homework.

I can only imagine what life would have been like if I had to spend an additional 1-1/2 to 2 hours in school for for days.

If we really focused on using current technology, there COULD BE some real savings. Take video conferencing for example. Taking classes from home would be a real cost savings, but we would have to figure out how to handle the social interactivity issues.

From 5 to 4 days is not a 20% reduction in costs -- maybe it's 2%, but what is it doing to real learning.

NJGUARDIAN of NJ 10:23AM March 19, 2009

I think adding hours to a students school day is a poor choice. Kids already have to much to do. I work with youth pastors across the US and oneof the major complaints that I hear is that students have so much to do they don't have time for things that should be more important. Like family time.

If my daughter spent 9 hours at school a day as our president suggests I would never see her. I don't want someone else to raise her, I want to raise her.

Families do a better job than teachers when it comes to teaching life skills.

Don't take that from my family. Don't take the short time I have with my family away from me. It is precious and a valued treasure in my life.

Joni Scudder of CO 8:05PM March 18, 2009

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Back to blog

On Education

Report cards may come out only twice a year, but education news happens every day. Here is where U.S. News writers grade the latest developments, from school districts banning the game of tag to congressional debates that affect college affordability. Check regularly for the most recent updates.