Educators Implicated in Atlanta Cheating Scandal

July 7, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (27)

For 10 years, hundreds of Atlanta public school teachers and principals changed answers on state tests in one of the largest cheating scandals in U.S. history, according to a scathing 413-page investigative report released Tuesday by Georgia Gov. Nathan Deal.

More than three quarters of the 56 schools investigated cheated on a 2009 standardized state test, with 178 educators implicated, including 38 principals. Eighty-two teachers confessed to erasing students' answers and correcting tests. The report says widespread cheating has occurred since at least 2001 and that orders to cheat came from the top.

[Read about testing scandals in other states.]

"Superintendent Beverly Hall and her senior staff knew, or should have known, that cheating and other offenses were occurring," the report says. Hall retired in June, after serving as the Atlanta Public School System superintendent for 11 years. Hall's lawyer told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which originally uncovered testing anomalies in Georgia public schools last year, that the former superintendent "definitely did not know of any widespread cheating."

In 2009, she won the national Superintendent of the Year award for the gains Atlanta public schools made. Between 2002 and 2009, eighth graders' reading scores on the National Assessment of Educational Progress reading test jumped 14 points—more than that of any other urban area. At the time, Hall said Atlanta's students were "digging out of a deep hole and doing it at a significantly fast rate."

But Gov. Deal's report says Atlanta's school system didn't deserve the praise it received. "Many of the accolades, and much of the praise, received by APS over the last decade were ill-gotten," the report says. "There was a failure of leadership."

Secretary of Education Arne Duncan told 11Alive News, the NBC news affiliate in Atlanta, that he was "stunned" by the revelation. "You really cheat the children, that's the part that's most disappointing about this whole situation."

[Learn how student cheaters often overestimate their intelligence.]

So far, no educators in Atlanta have faced criminal charges. The misconduct extended beyond erasing answers—teachers admitted to placing lower-performing students next to high achievers so they could cheat more easily, pointing to correct answers while students were taking the tests, and reading answers aloud during testing.

The report says a "culture of fear and conspiracy of silence infected this school system, and kept many teachers from speaking freely about misconduct."

Duncan said better test security could prevent cheating from happening in the future, but that the incident was an "isolated" one. However, testing scandals have plagued other school districts. In March, USA Today reported that tests in 103 schools in Washington, D.C. had higher-than-normal erasure rates. Officials in the District are currently investigating the claims.

Testing anomalies have also been found in the cities of Detroit and Baltimore and states including Ohio, Arizona, California, Colorado, and Florida. "The vast majority of people do things the right way," Duncan said.

See how your school stacks up in our rankings of Best High Schools. Have something of interest to share? Send your news to us at highschoolnotes@usnews.com.

Tags:
Georgia,
Atlanta,
cheating,
education,
teachers,
standardized tests,
high school,
K-12 education

Reader Comments Read all comments (27)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

As a school teacher by education I was appalled altho, not surprised by the current turn of events. Considering how funds are handled and teachers made de facto financiers. Schools are the disseminators of funds to children. This is their initiative to assist the most helpless in their communities first. The problem is that this is an illicit proposition.

Dissemination of funds is a centrist theme that does not have a logical conclusion without a clearly stated set of regulations. School systems need to state their intention of servicing children first by immediate succession before either funds, or other groups involved. Schools are a social point of service to children period, not a conferred upon community bank.

Otherwise, the teachers will continue to be directed, conducted, and purposed to corporal punishment having been made the arbiters of funds with unclear obligations & originations. The responsible parties are those that make these policies, and in the Georgia case the ties can not be refuted to the superintendants office.

Unclarified systemic policies concerning funds and the dissemination of goods used for their purchases are the problem. For example between proprietorial cycle and disbursement conventions there are many dualities. Proprietorial cycles begin on the second convention of dispersement.

This is convoluted. Further disbursements are equivalent to a contraposit by the root words. Contrapositions can not begin about money from the beginning at the first position A negative= I unknown. I negative= A negative, and this makes sense. Plus E negative = A negative too.

Then in order for the conversation about deposits to strictly make sense there is no beginning from the very beginning at the first statement. Some people in the past have used this argument to waive certain deposit fees.

Children receiving assistance first is not clear in any of this, nor is the role of the employee distributing the goods.

Angelica of DE 11:59AM April 03, 2013

I don't think it is ok for teacher's pay to be based on their student's test score.I believe it was inevident that a teacher would raise their student's score just so he/she could get paid more.Some people are just greedy for money. -Gear Moore 1A

Gear Moore of MD 12:04AM September 04, 2011

I believe teachers should not be paid on the score of a student on a test. If teachers were paid based on this students could intentionally fail to give a teacher they don't like a bad pay. Having teachers get paid for the work of a student just is not right because it would get people to cheat for students so they could get the right pay for themselves.If this way of learning continued, entire school systems would become corrupt and the future would be full of cheaters and non educated people. I believe that the future would become a dangerous place if students learned this way.

-Tariq Abdullah 3B

Tariq Abdullah of MD 8:57AM September 02, 2011

High School Notes

Whether you are a parent, teacher, student, or administrator, get caught up on the latest news, ideas, and policy debates affecting America’s high school classrooms. Have something of interest to share? Send your news and notes to us at highschoolnotes@usnews.com.

advertisement

advertisement