Many STEM Teachers Don't Hold Certifications

June 8, 2011 RSS Feed Print

With teacher layoffs and staff shortages nationwide, some teachers are being asked to teach subjects they are not certified to teach.

Roughly 30 percent of chemistry and physics teachers in public high schools did not major in these fields and haven't earned a certificate to teach those subjects, according to a new survey released Monday by the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). Half of earth science teachers are similarly unqualified.

Tom Luce, CEO of the National Math and Science Initiative (NMSI) and a former assistant secretary at the U.S. Department of Education, says that, oftentimes, a certificate to teach science isn't enough.

"In our mind, a certificate doesn't necessarily mean somebody has content knowledge," he says. Although subject certification varies state to state, Luce says that taking one chemistry class in college might qualify a teacher to teach the subject. "If you don't have content knowledge then it's very difficult to not only teach the class, but it's virtually impossible to inspire somebody."

According to the NCES study, which surveyed high school teachers during the 2007-2008 school year, fewer than half of chemistry and physics teachers majored in those subjects, and a quarter of math teachers don't hold math degrees. The problem extends to history, where less than two thirds of teachers hold a history degree. Conversely, 82 percent of English teachers, 90 percent of art teachers, and 95 percent of music teachers hold a bachelor's degree or higher in their field.

Luce says the problem is most prevalent in middle school, where more than two thirds of math teachers aren't qualified to teach the subject, a 2007 report by the National Academies shows. Only 1 in 10 middle school physical science teachers have a degree or certification in the subject, according to the same report. "That's when you lose a kid's interest," he says. "They don't even want to try in high school because they think, 'I didn't like this in middle school.'"

NMSI's UTeach science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) teacher training program has been heralded by President Obama. The program, operated in 22 universities, allows undergraduate students to earn a bachelor of science in math or science while earning a teaching certificate. A similar program by The Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship foundation will train 450 STEM teachers in three states.

But when districts need to fill teaching vacancies, they are often forced to take the best available option—which means a math teacher might be asked to teach physics, or a biology teacher might teach chemistry.

[Learn how companies are promoting STEM education.]

Luce doesn't blame the teachers. "Their principal comes to them and says 'Guess what, you're going to teach algebra next year.' Well, I'll put it very simply," he says. "You can't teach what you don't know."

Linda Rosen, chief executive officer of Change the Equation, a STEM education advocacy group and former math teacher, agrees that districts are sometimes forced to choose from a small pool.

"If a state or district is really down to the wire and school is fast approaching, they need an adult in that classroom. They're not just going to choose a warm body off the street, but they may give out emergency certification at that point," she says.

Some districts are implementing mentoring and training programs led by highly trained teachers, and may pay for teachers to take classes in the subject they will be teaching. But in many poor school districts, both urban and rural, schools are facing teacher shortages.

"Teaching in high-poverty, high-needs schools is not necessarily an appealing option," Rosen says. Even though many teachers may find themselves teaching outside their specialty, that doesn't necessarily mean they are bad teachers, she says, noting, "There are a lot of dedicated people who are trying their best."

See how your school stacks up in our rankings of Best High Schools. Have something of interest to share? Send your news to us at highschoolnotes@usnews.com.

Tags:
math,
teachers,
public schools,
students,
technology,
engineering,
education,
science,
STEM education

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

In 1981, I presented a paper at a corporate training program on challenges my company faced in the defense industry over the next two decades. Among the challenges were to hire, retain and retrain educated workers who would be capable of using radically new and productive tools and processes in Science, Technology, Engineering and Manufacturing (mathematics, I proposed, was fundamental to all of the STEM occupations). At the time I coined the STEM acronym, a few prognosticators proposed to add logistics and support services to my ellipsis; but they could not grasp that logistics and support were enabled by Manufacturing - - and hence, dependent upon Manufacturing and the STE functions.

It was a pity to see the NSF fail in understanding and misrepresenting STEM, which was likely because NSF members have neither the experience nor the comprehension of Manufacturing and its impact on value creation in a STEM-based economy. Their fatal error has lead to a state of national confusion in STEM’s characterization by disregarding Manufacturing, which is so fundamental to completing the value equation (employment); math is fundamental to each of the STEM occupations and functions; but it is not an occupation or function - - it is a foundation for STEM to occur, with Manufacturing being the output.

In pursuit of economic recovery, America has an opportunity to revitalize its global competitiveness by educating a new generation for leadership in Science, Technology, Engineering and Manufacturing. Notice that I placed Manufacturing in the STEM acronym into its rightful position of importance. While mathematics is certainly required for excellence in Science, Technology and Engineering, a strong Manufacturing base is vital to reviving and sustaining a healthy economy.

For example, a US workforce educated and skilled in nanotechnology will enable America to rejuvenate its global advantages in biology, medicine, electronics, agriculture, and virtually every area where we can recapture our manufacturing proficiency that made this Nation great. But make no mistake; STEM is not a results-oriented, value creating proposition unless Manufacturing is part of its equation; mathematics is simply one of the prerequisites to achieve leadership in a STEM-based nation.

Those who embrace the challenges and opportunities of STEM, be they freshmen choosing careers or middle-aged workers re-educating themselves for second careers, will gain relevant knowledge and skills to compete in world markets. We will achieve this only if we realize Manufacturing is an inseparable component of STEM; otherwise, we will export our wealth to global competitors who have succeeded in making Manufacturing an inseparable part of their economies. In the near term, revitalizing STEM education can increase American jobs and strengthen our future economy. Over the longer term, this is a pathway back to America's global economic leadership, to our national security, and prosperity.

Jonathan Kirk of MD 1:35PM October 11, 2011

For the most part, few so-called STEM programs include the study of broad-based technology or engineering as an integral element. Even fewer have certified Technology and Engineering teachers. In the absence of state mandates, an alarming number of Technology Education programs have bitten the dust via the budget axe.

Most of those formerly teaching Tech Ed have now found lucrative jobs in industry, and colleges are graduating few practitioners. Regardless of their qualifications to teach math or science, these teachers remain unqualified to integrate technology and engineering design into the program.

Our Federal administration has forged ahead in support of STEM education with "eyes wide shut." STEM education is the total integration of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics in proportional measure. Few educators and even fewer legislators are able to articulate what a STEM program really looks like.

For decades, we have credited our technological achievements to science and mathematics. By the time our society realizes that it was not "rocket science" that put a man on the moon, but rocket engineering, it may be too late.

Even if we begin today preparing the STEM workers of tomorrow, we will not be able to graduate enough of them to fill the void when our aging STEM workforce retires. Outsourcing or hiring foreign workers is a certainty.

Our one salvation is American ingenuity. Creativity and innovation however is not developed by studying more math and science. It is developed by giving children the opportunity to be creative and apply math and science to solve a technological problem. Without the T & E in STEM, you just have more S & M.

Michael Miller of OH 10:18PM June 13, 2011

High School Notes

Whether you are a parent, teacher, student, or administrator, get caught up on the latest news, ideas, and policy debates affecting America’s high school classrooms. Have something of interest to share? Send your news and notes to us at highschoolnotes@usnews.com.

Best High Schools for Science and Math

Advanced Placement math and science courses provide rigorous training for college, and these 208 schools excel in preparing students with the technical skills.

Hs Stem Rankings Btn

College Search

Within miles of Advanced Search

advertisement

Knowledge Centers

Looking at colleges? Find out what you need to know.

Parent Question-of-the-Day

What will be your primary resource to help pay for college?
[ View Results ]