CEOs Call for New STEM Standards

April 21, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (3)

Earlier today, a consortium of CEOs called for standard math and science benchmark testing for U.S. high school students, citing a wide variance among states of what is considered "proficient."

"We're doing students, parents and America's competitiveness a disservice by not demanding higher standards for STEM learning," Craig Barrett, former CEO of Intel and current chair of Change the Equation, the group behind the study, said in a statement.

The group is made up of 110 business executives who hope to improve STEM (science, technology, engineering, mathematics) achievement in the country, especially among females and minorities, who have typically performed worse on STEM standardized tests than have white males.

The move comes a week after the Institute for a Competitive Workforce, a group affiliated with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, urged America to try new strategies with STEM education.

Change the Equation sent a letter and an individualized report to the governors of all 50 states and the mayor of Washington, D.C. The organization is urging leaders to focus more on STEM education and maintain high standards on state tests. The report outlines each state's test results and weaknesses and highlights achievement gaps between different demographic groups.

The main problem, the report says, is that many states have lowered passing scores on state science and math tests. Passing rates increase, but when students take nationwide tests such as the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), the same students who scored "proficient" on state exams fail.

"If you lower the bar, then the word proficient loses all meaning," said Linda Rosen, CEO of Change the Equation.

States need to prepare for a drop in student pass rates if standards are raised, as the report suggests.

It's not all bad news. Several states, including Michigan, New York, Oregon, and Tennessee, recently raised passing scores on their math tests. Some states are increasing the number of STEM teachers they employ. Maryland, for example, plans to triple the number of STEM teachers in areas that have current shortages over the next couple years.

President Barack Obama has championed improving STEM education. At a Facebook Town Hall event Wednesday, Obama reiterated the importance of STEM education.

"We've got to lift our game up when it comes to science, math, and technology," he said. "That's hopefully the greatest legacy I can have as President of the United States." In his 2011 State of the Union address in January, he said he wants the nation to prepare 100,000 new STEM teachers over the next 10 years.

Tom Kalil, the White House's deputy director for science and technology policy, said in order for the United States to catch up to countries such as China, India, and South Korea, America needs to fundamentally change to embrace STEM.

"In China, Bill Gates is Britney Spears; in the U.S., Britney Spears is Britney Spears," he said. "We need to teach our kids that it's not just the winner of the Super Bowl who deserves to be celebrated—it's the winner of the science fair, too."

See how your school stacks up in our rankings of Best High Schools. Have something of interest to share? Send your news to us at highschoolnotes@usnews.com.

Tags:
science,
education reform,
Obama administration,
math,
STEM education,
technology,
high school,
Barack Obama,
education policy

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

These CEOs and politicians are out of touch with reality. Like generals safely back behind the battlefront, they have no idea what's going on in the trenches.

Fact: There are too many PhDs in science.

http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110420/full/472276a.html

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=does-the-us-produce-too-m

http://pubs.acs.org/cen/science/89/8905sci1.html

Fact: Engineering is no longer an attractive career to the brightest students.

America's best are seeking non-technical careers. (http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/oct2009/db20091027_723059.htm) This is not because they lack educational opportunities; the profession as it exists in today's corporate environment is relatively low-paying, lacks advancement opportunities, and is a deadend.

Fact: Offshoring is killing the engineering profession.

Ironically, Craig Barrett is a big proponent of offshoring jobs and replacing American engineers and scientists with foreign ones. (http://www.infoworld.com/t/platforms/tech-ceos-defend-offshore-outsourcing-925) Wages among engineers and scientists have been stagnant for decades; by removing the carrot from the stick, these CEOs have ensured that STEM will remain unattractive to American kids.

Sure, we can do a better job of teaching our kids, but do we really need STEM-focused education when the economy (thanks in large part to short-sighted CEOs and politicians) has irreversibly lost its manufacturing base? I'd rather my kids become fluent in multiple languages, learn how to run a business, or learn economics.

Joe of MD 10:37PM April 25, 2011

Yes, America needs to embrace STEM education. But teacher professional development must be central; not standardized tests. Read THE TEACHING GAP by Stigler and Hiebert (1999) to see that, and/or visit the TIMSS video website: http://timssvideo.com , for evidence.

Arizona State University has an excellent program in the Department of Physics that improves student interest and student competency. The Modeling Instruction Program is an evolving, widely-used, research-validated program for high school and middle school science education reform supported by the National Science Foundation from 1989 to 2005. It is one of only two K-12 science programs to be recognized as Exemplary by the U.S. Department of Education. Student gains in achievement on physics concept inventories are typically double those under traditional instruction; and data suggest large improvement by urban Phoenix students in high-poverty schools on the Arizona AIMS 8th grade mathematics test.

http://modeling.asu.edu/modeling-HS.html

http://modeling.asu.edu/Success/AIMSmath_urbanPhxGain.htm

A retiring high school physics teacher in Phoenix who participated in the ASU Modeling Instruction Program wrote me recently, "Modeling Instruction was instrumental in the success of many of my students - one is finishing his PhD in theoretical plasma physics at Princeton, another has just started at MIT. Countless others are (or have successfully) pursued engineering, mathematics and other programs of study. ... There seems to be no substitute for the combined elements of inquiry, discussion, and rigorous quantitative investigations when it comes to my students learning the art of thinking. The removal of funding for highly successful programs is, I am sad to say, the hallmark of these dark times."

The ASU program provides three-week summer Modeling Workshop courses for 100 Arizona science teachers each summer. 850 teachers have participated. The Ministry of Education for Singapore, which leads the world in K-12 mathematics and science, values Modeling Instruction so highly that in four summers they have sent 21 physics and chemistry teachers to ASU for Modeling Workshops. They fly two Modeling Workshop peer leaders to Singapore each year to conduct week-long workshops for teachers.

The ASU Modeling Instruction program has helped 33 different universities across the U.S. and many school districts to organize Modeling Workshop courses at their institutions. Experienced teachers who use Modeling Instruction live in 48 states — an ample supply of talent to assist university faculty to develop Modeling Instruction courses for local K-12 science teachers.

Unfortunately, at ASU our Federal ESEA Title II "Improving Teacher Quality" grant ended in January. Teachers' salaries are low, so they need funding. Seeking funding is time-consuming. We persist because Modeling Instruction improves the quality of science education and alleviates the shortage of qualified science teachers.

Jane Jackson of AZ 10:00PM April 24, 2011

There is a huge problem with out-of-field teachers; teachers that did not major or minor in the classes they are teaching. Although I thought it might be worse in math and science, it turns out it's pretty much across the board - about 25% for English, social studies, math and science. It's especially bad at the middle school level and it's even worse in minority and low income schools, where out-of-field teachers can make up 50%. How can we expect our students to achieve if they don't have qualified teachers?

Paula Lovell of TX 10:43PM April 21, 2011

High School Notes

Whether you are a parent, teacher, student, or administrator, get caught up on the latest news, ideas, and policy debates affecting America’s high school classrooms. Have something of interest to share? Send your news and notes to us at highschoolnotes@usnews.com.

advertisement

advertisement