Morse Code: Inside the College Rankings

Should Diversity Be Added to Best Law Schools Rankings?

April 7, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (9)

U.S. News recently received a letter from The State Bar of California asserting that our main Best Law Schools rankings would be improved by including numerous diversity-related measures.

This new diversity category would include indicators measuring the degree to which a law school's student body is ethnically diverse, possibly relative to state-wide demographic data. One indicator would be a determination of whether law schools had taken "concrete actions," via programs and activities committed to diversity that are aligned with the "ABA Accreditation Standards on Diversity" (Standard 212).

U.S. News was urged to poll diversity professionals at law schools on diversity reputation or include diversity as a category on our existing reputation surveys. Finally, the letter also recommends that these new diversity variables count for a total of 15 percent of a law school's overall score and that the weights of the existing peer surveys and student selectivity (admissions data) be reduced.

U.S. News doesn't incorporate our current diversity index or diversity into the Best Law Schools rankings, because measuring how successful law schools are at achieving diversity goals cannot be included easily in our rankings formula in a fair and meaningful way. The current U.S. News diversity index does not measure how successful law schools are at achieving diversity standards against a benchmark; rather, it measures to what extent a law school is diverse.

There are many key questions that need to be resolved. For example, U.S. News would need to determine what scale would be used to measure diversity success for each law school. How should law schools be compared in ethnically diverse states like California and Florida with those in far less diverse states like Vermont and Iowa? Should Stanford University and the University of Southern California, both private law schools, be measured against the same scale as public schools in California like UCLA?

How should diversity at Howard University in Washington, D.C. and North Carolina Central University law schools, which are part of the historically black colleges and universities, be measured? Should diversity just be based on ethnic diversity and not take into account economic diversity? How would law school economic diversity be measured? We also need to consider what the law schools themselves think about including diversity in the rankings.

Yet another important issue is to what degree diversity is linked to academic quality versus being an important social goal. There is also the key question of whether diversity should even be included in the rankings, given that the main purpose of the rankings is to identify the best schools academically.

I spoke with Craig Holden, a partner at Lewis, Brisbois, Bisgaard & Smith and chair of the Council on Access & Fairness for The State Bar of California, who was the catalyst behind the proposal to U.S. News, and told him that U.S. News was willing to have further discussions so we could determine the feasibility of the suggestions.

In addition, U.S. News would need to work with a representative group of legal educators and others to develop such diversity success yardsticks. We cannot do it without outside assistance and some meaningful level of agreement on the right things to measure and the correct metrics to use to measure them.

Searching for a law firm? Get our complete rankings of Best Law Firms.

Tags:
diversity,
law,
law school,
rankings,
race

Reader Comments Read all comments (9)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Ivan,

There is not a single person at Harvard Law with those credentials, and if there is, they are not white.

What do you propose Law Schools do? Should they interview students to find those whom they think would best exemplify their goals of an institution? I think we both know that would be impossible as thousands of students apply every year for Law Schools around the nation.

The only legitimate basis we have are objective testing and GPA's which show several things: Natural intelligence, desire to go to law school, work ethic and ability to think as law students are called to think. These objective factors illustrate the skills necessary to be successful. Your argument about Bird and Marino fail because they were objectively HIGHLY successful candidates when they were being considered for the NBA and NFL respectively as both were some of the best in their sport at the collegiate level and teams saw that as an indicator of their talent level. Bird's lack of speed was overcome by his overall basketball skills and Marino's lack of test taking ability were overcome by his cannon for an arm. Students can overcome low LSATs by having a high GPA or vice-versa. Similarly Law Schools should focus more on the objective standards like the LSAT, GPA and undergraduate universities so as to make sure the candidates entering their institutions are the most qualified.

Being a recent law school graduate at a Top 25 Law School I noticed something very sad about the state of affairs regarding our minority population at the University. There were no African Americans on Law Review and less than 3 in the top 25% of the class. What does this say? No, the school is not racist as the grading and acceptance to Law Review is done completely blind. What it says is that many students are at a university where they simply could not compete. This is not a favor to these students as they now have to compete in a job market where no one is being considered for interviews unless you are in the top 33% of the class.

Holding different races to different standards is plain and simple racism. It is an affirmation that some people are not as talented as others based purely on the color of their skin and that is wrong. I don't attest to the school of thought that "being at the table, no matter the reason, is a success". NO, everyone should be at the table because of their merits, not because of the color of their skin or sex or nationality. It is a sad state of affairs when in the year 2011 we are trying to attain diversity merely for the sake of diversity.

Sean of FL 1:44PM June 27, 2011

For the arguments, see http://writ.news.findlaw.com/amar/20100312.html

and

http://writ.news.findlaw.com/amar/20100409.html

Kevin of CA 6:26PM April 11, 2011

I think the addition of a blatantly political yardstick like this would seriously damage the credibility of the ratings.

michael livingston of NJ 10:22AM April 11, 2011

Morse Code: Inside the College Rankings

Robert Morse is director of data research for U.S.News & World Report and has worked at the company since 1976. He develops the methodologies and surveys for the Best Colleges and Best Graduate Schools annual rankings, keeping an eye on higher-education trends to make sure the rankings offer prospective students the best analysis available. Morse Code provides deeper insights into the methodologies and is a forum for commentary and analysis of college, grad, and other rankings.

advertisement

College Search

Within miles of Advanced Search

Knowledge Centers

Looking at colleges? Find out what you need to know.

advertisement