Morse Code: Inside the College Rankings

Have the U.S. News Law School Rankings Been Game-Changers in Law School Admissions?

March 4, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (13)

The U.S.News & World Report law school rankings have had a substantial impact on law school admissions and law school diversity, say Michael Sauder of the University of Iowa and Wendy Nelson Espeland of Northwestern University in their recent article, "Rankings and Diversity." The article joins a rapidly expanding body of literature on law school rankings and the effect that the rankings have had on law schools, prospective students, legal employers, and alumni.

Regarding the ramifications of our rankings for law schools, the article notes:

"U.S. News rankings have changed admissions practices because they affect a broad range of law schools' constituents. This impact is often intangible, even subtle, because they indirectly reshape how we think about quality and reputation in legal education. Media rankings, which have become a prominent, fateful measure of performance and status, place enormous pressure on law schools to boost the statistics that the rankings incorporate. Prospective students, current students, faculty, administrators (including trustees and university presidents), alumni (including boards of visitors and donors), legal employers, and the media that cover education (including national and regional newspapers and news magazines, as well as journalism devoted to law and higher education) all attend to rankings. Rankings not only influence individual decisions about where to apply and attend law school, but also organizational decisions such as whom to admit or hire, how to evaluate the work of subordinates, peers, or superiors, and how to think about status and specialization in the field of legal education. Rankings subtly, powerfully, and enduringly shape perceptions of ability and achievement."

The authors also comment on the impact that the U.S. News law school rankings have had on law school diversity, and they give their views on the annual U.S. News law school diversity index. They say that "because rankings include selectivity statistics (LSAT scores, undergraduate grade point averages, and acceptance rates account for 25% of a school's overall rank) that reflect racial, gender, economic and geographical differences, and because the ability to perform well under duress on a timed, standardized test is a highly restrictive form of merit, efforts to improve these statistics can threaten various forms of diversity. Notably, U.S. News's diversity index is not factored into the overall rankings given to law schools but is presented separately, which hugely undercuts its impact."

U.S. News doesn't incorporate its current diversity index into the law school rankings, because measuring how successful law schools are at achieving diversity is a very complicated issue that cannot easily be included in our rankings formula in a fair and meaningful way. The current U.S. News diversity index does not measure how successful law schools are at achieving diversity against a benchmark. For example, U.S. News would need to determine what scale would be used to measure diversity for each law school. How should law schools be compared in ethnically diverse states like California and Florida, say, with those in far less diverse states like Maine and Kansas? U.S. News is willing to work with legal educators and others to develop such fair diversity yardsticks, but we cannot do it without outside assistance.

U.S. News believes that our law school rankings are not hindering diversity at law schools since we use the median (or midpoint) LSAT scores and undergraduate grade-point averages, instead of averages, as ranking factors. The median gives schools considerable flexibility to accept students with very low LSAT and undergraduate grades without lowering the school's actual median LSAT and grade-point average­­—and in turn, without negatively affecting their U.S. News rankings.

Tags:
law school,
rankings

Reader Comments Read all comments (13)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The only reason why amerikkkans are against standardized test is because they realize that such simple test demonstrate amerikkkans over inflated sense of self worth and compounded low level intelligence.

amerikkkans noticed that other countries (including countries with far worse economies) have children with superior intellect. I.E japanese and korean 10 years have the intellect allowing them to create advanced robotics for science fairs and have fun doing it. amerikkkan 10 years olds are still struggling with small division.

Too Stupid; Didn't read: amerikkkans are nowhere as intelligent as they thought and don't like it.

and yes my spelling of amerikkka is more correct than you asspained tards then you're willing to admit.

Nineball 4:31PM June 07, 2010

What in the hell are all of you commenting about?

Shocked of XX says:

"Your final paragraph is a disgrace and evinces a complete lack of understanding of how standardized tests prejudice poor people from all racial categories"

The final paragraph says nothing about the shortcomings of people from "all racial categories." It merely states that the rankings leave room to accommodate more diversity without punishing the institution. While it does imply that these beneficiaries tend to be "racially diverse" (i.e not white), this is not an opinion, it is a fact - and it is a good one if you want to actually have any mexican american or african americans attending top law schools.

Loretta of WA says:

"US News has certainly had an effect on the ratio of women at top law schools. LSAC data reports that men outscore women at LSAT scores over 170 in a nearly 2 to 1 ratio, and that at 165 and higher, more than two-thirds of all applicants are male. In fact, the number of men with LSAT scores of 165 to 169 was higher last year than the number of women with LSAT scores from 165 to 180!"

The ability to perform under timed, high-pressure test is apparently a benchmark which favors men over women. The law schools / US News apparently think that performing under such circumstances is an important skill for attorneys, which is one of the reasons why the LSAT is heavily weighted. The test helps to match ability to institution.. the fact that women are not (apparently) as strong in this area does not make the law school admission process biased. The converse is true - if the LSAT were under-weighted to accommodate women, THAT would be the real injustice.

Stephen of WA 10:23PM June 03, 2010

then the ONLY possible explanation is that the test is biased against them. LOL

Chiqwanda of CA 7:52PM April 14, 2010

Morse Code: Inside the College Rankings

Robert Morse is director of data research for U.S.News & World Report and has worked at the company since 1976. He develops the methodologies and surveys for the Best Colleges and Best Graduate Schools annual rankings, keeping an eye on higher-education trends to make sure the rankings offer prospective students the best analysis available. Morse Code provides deeper insights into the methodologies and is a forum for commentary and analysis of college, grad, and other rankings.

advertisement

College Search

Within miles of Advanced Search

Knowledge Centers

Looking at colleges? Find out what you need to know.

advertisement