Morse Code: Inside the College Rankings

Fidelity

Will Paying for SAT Scores Boost Baylor's Ranking?

October 16, 2008 RSS Feed Print

Baylor University's policy of paying already admitted and enrolled students to retake the SAT test so the school possibly can use the improved scores to pursue a higher spot in the America's Best Colleges ranking is causing a lot soul searching in academia. The New York Times, Inside Higher Education, and Chronicle of Higher Education have all weighed in with stories that criticize the practice.

The Baylor Lariat, Baylor University's student newspaper, which broke the story, has written extensively on the controversy surrounding Baylor's policy of paying students a $300 book credit at the school store for retaking the SAT test after they'd already been admitted to the fall 2008 class. If the additional test improved their SAT composite score (on the Critical Reading and Math parts of the SAT) by 50 points or more, they got an additional $1,000 merit-based "Baylor Scholarship."

According to Baylor University, 861 students, or about 28 percent of the fall 2008 entering class of 3,062, took the SAT again and earned the $300. Of those, 150 increased their scores by at least 50 points, earning an additional $1,000 each. As a result of the retesting, Baylor's fall 2008 entering class combined SAT average score went up 10 points, to 1210.

Baylor, it turns out, is very interested in moving much higher in the America's Best Colleges rankings. It has a very public long-term plan called "Baylor 2012" that has as one its many goals to be ranked 50th, compared with the school's 76th rank in the 2009 edition. As part of this goal, Baylor wants to increase its peer assessment score to a pretty lofty 3.7 out of 4.0, compared with its current 3.1. Both of these goals are clearly unattainable within five years.

So what impact would 10 additional points on the SAT scores have on a school's overall ranking in the America's Best Colleges? None. Test scores account for 7.5 percent of the U.S. News rankings. U.S. News does not use the actual SAT test scores in our ranking calculations; instead, we measure where a school's average Math and Critical Reading scores fall in the national percentiles of all SAT test takers. So, 10 points up on average test scores would result in—at most—two or three more percentiles, not nearly enough to move a school up even one place in the rankings.

The bottom line on Baylor's SAT retesting: There's no academic value in asking students already enrolled at the university to retake a college admissions test. U.S. News disapproves of any educational policy that's designed solely to manipulate data to boost a school's ranking.

Tags:
college admissions,
rankings,
Baylor University,
SAT

Reader Comments Read all comments (9)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

the raking is kind is kind of the problem, for the student like i said before in a confrence the grade matters more than the learning its self and thats the problem i had when i was younger

kara martin of TX 10:39AM November 18, 2009

Before you all crucify Baylor University's administration, have you pondered on the economic benefit that the $300 book scholarship and the $1000 merit scholarship that the Baylor freshmen received. You all should be ashamed of yourselves for judging a book by its cover. Is there anything wrong in trying to help out students financially - even if it means retaking a test as simple as the SAT. Why are we all looking for a scape goat to punish rather than an angel. Please reconsider.

Bucknor Macade of TX 1:03PM November 18, 2008

I imagine that the peer assessment metric is used as a way of comparing apples and oranges. Raw data about graduation rates and SAT scores might be too close for the folks here who rank things (which by the way, seems as American as apple pie), so they've come up with the somewhat arbitrary peer assessment. No statistic alone is dispositive, but it can be at least informative. Baylor suffers somewhat from a perception that the school is not as competitive and the quality of education is not as good as other schools. If the students are getting a quality education, then who really cares? If you don't like it, create your own rankings system.

Baylor can't have it both ways. They can't complain that the ranking system treats them unfairly and then use such obviously manipulative tactics to skew their scores. This is not to say that no one else plays this game (I'm guessing most schools play fast and loose with "spending per student" and tuition rates), but if you cheat so openly, you're going to get caught. Maybe they need to accept that going up 26 positions in such a short period of time is imminently unreasonable. Maybe a long term plan (that's not tied to someone's job performance, maybe?) aimed at improving job placement and the student/faculty ratio would have better results.

Paul W. of TX 4:42PM October 23, 2008

Morse Code: Inside the College Rankings

Robert Morse is director of data research for U.S.News & World Report and has worked at the company since 1976. He develops the methodologies and surveys for the Best Colleges and Best Graduate Schools annual rankings, keeping an eye on higher-education trends to make sure the rankings offer prospective students the best analysis available. Morse Code provides deeper insights into the methodologies and is a forum for commentary and analysis of college, grad, and other rankings.

advertisement

College Search

Within miles of Advanced Search

Knowledge Centers

Looking at colleges? Find out what you need to know.

Parent Question-of-the-Day

What will be your primary resource to help pay for college?
[ View Results ]

advertisement