Reinventing the M.B.A.

B-schools are overhauling curriculum to turn out more innovative, socially responsible leaders.

March 14, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (8)

Lindsey Olier Barnes had just arrived in Bangalore, India for a monthlong internship at IT giant Infosys when she encountered one of the real-world problems she'd heard so much about back at Stanford University's Graduate School of Business. The Infosys group to which she was assigned had been tasked with getting managers to focus on new products as well as the company's traditional niche, providing cost-cutting solutions to clients. The move was out of the comfort zone for many managers, and a constant complaint of her colleagues in the group was, "They won't listen."

So Barnes took a page from her Leadership Labs course. She made a point of hearing out the managers before launching into her own spiel, so she could "address the root causes of their concerns." Suddenly they seemed more receptive and started asking questions about the new strategy. By letting them voice their worries about what the change could mean for them and their employees, Barnes says, she earned their trust. She had learned that "people don't care about how much you know until they know how much you care."

[Get application advice from M.B.A. admissions officials.]

Barnes's communication coup is exactly the kind of outcome business educators have in mind as they rethink M.B.A. programs to de-emphasize traditional discipline-based courses like marketing and finance in favor of a focus on leadership skills, innovation, social responsibility, and a global perspective. A handful of elite institutions, including the Yale School of Management, Stanford, and, most recently, the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, have led the charge with radical curriculum overhauls.

But John Fernandes, president and CEO of AACSB International–The Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business, which accredits b-schools, estimates that upwards of 75 percent of schools have made some changes to their curricula. "In many instances, you are seeing them being destroyed and rebuilt," he says. The capacity of the leaders "that society expects today is so demanding and so broad that everyone is rushing to meet those needs."

Yale rolled out its new curriculum in 2006, after a yearlong review in which administrators found a widening disconnect between M.B.A. programs and the business world. The school eliminated traditional coursework in favor of interdisciplinary classes focused on the "organizational perspectives" of different parties. So, for example, instead of taking a finance class, students take courses on the investor and the customer and learn about the fundamentals of finance in each class from those different perspectives. Economics is similarly taught from various viewpoints, including those of competitors, the state and society, and operations.

The old case study method of instruction has been revisited, too. Rather than consider pre-digested summaries of company situations, students tackle "raw cases" packed with original data. Instead of being presented with an income statement, for example, they must mine the considerably bulkier annual filing to the Securities and Exchange Commission for data. The raw cases "push us to understand," says second-year Yale student Jason Hill. "They purposely put in more material than you could ever look at, but you have to learn where to look."

Another buzz phrase in b-school circles these days is "leadership development." It's a key component of the M.B.A. programs deemed most successful by David Garvin, a professor of business administration at Harvard Business School and coauthor of Rethinking the MBA: Business Education at a Crossroads. The ability to guide others and give staff members critical feedback must be developed, Garvin argues, through exercises and experiences that develop self-awareness and an appreciation of how coworkers affect one another. Stanford similarly stresses what Dean Garth Saloner calls three leadership capabilities: critical analytical thinking; innovative thinking; and personal leadership.

Tags:
Yale University,
Stanford University,
Harvard University,
business school,
graduate schools

Reader Comments Read all comments (8)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I would just like to go on record to say "you are haters". This woman is obviously smart and driven and you go to her twitter page to find a quote and hate on her. Says more about you than her. Get a life and stop hating on people who are doing big things in life.

Omaree of CA 4:00AM September 16, 2011

As stated, the subject of this article is on-the-record via Twitter admitting to being interested in selling people stuff they don't need.

So much for Stanford ethics getting making a difference on her ethical integrity. Check it out.

http://preview.tinyurl.com/3n9ux22

Check out who hired her as well: Boston Consulting Group

http://www.linkedin.com/in/lindseyolierbarnes

Looks like she's well on her way to manipulating the feeble minded to make purchases they don't need -- probably on credit too. Glad she's looking out for my (i.e. the consumers) best interest.

Kinda sucks that between Harvard and Stanford she didn't realize the foul nature of her interests. Now BCG is probably behind her 100% too. Anything to make dollar I suppose. I really don't care -- I just take offense to people trying to smooth it over with article like this. She took a Leadership Labs course, she listens, she cares --- yeah right.

Let's not confuse most MBA candidates for what they really are fundamentally -- hyper competitive people who want to be rich and powerful as quickly as possible. Most would bypass the MBA if they could sign on with the next Facebook right now. As a result I doubt any amount of classroom activities are going to change their short-term, egocentric, and money-mongering attitudes.

Adam of CA 6:14PM August 01, 2011

Has business school education gotten so far from the fundamentals of being a human being that teaching listening skills is now considered ground breaking? That's a damn shame.

The real problem, IMO, is the lack of adherence to core intellectual standards, and the cultivation on intellectual traits. Scoring in the 90th percentile on the GMAT, and taking a bunch of classes at Stanford doesn't mean that you're fit to lead people and make decisions that will have serious impacts on their lives. However, this is the criteria we're using to decide who will get into these positions.

Also, in many cases, I believe MBA candidates harbor general lack of respect for those they are meant to serve. Specifically, they place their careers over doing what's best for their customers. For example, the subject of this article

states has gone on the record and publicly stated that she's interested in selling people things they don't need. So essentially she's interested, and certainly willing, to manipulate people into buying crap they don't need. How does that add value to society? I'll tell you where it adds value to her companies bottom line. Also, I suspect Ms. Olier Barnes could care less if she's selling people crap they don't need as long as she is on track to be a CMO and get paid seven figures. Too bad her Leadership Labs class didn't cover integrity and self-corrective thinking.

Lance of CA 5:54PM August 01, 2011

Grad School Search

advertisement

Knowledge Centers

Looking at grad schools? Find out what you need to know.

The GRE® Tests: Get the Facts

Find out more at takethegre.com.

The GRE® revised General Test is the most widely accepted graduate admissions test.

True

False

Submit
Answer: True

The GRE® revised General Test is accepted at thousands of graduate and business school programs all over the world. Find out more at takethegre.com.