Business School Rankings Methodology

March 14, 2011 RSS Feed Print

All 437 master's programs in business accredited by AACSB International were surveyed in fall 2010 and early 2011 (398 responded, of which 142 provided the data needed to calculate full-time M.B.A. rankings based on a weighted average of the indicators described below). All 437 schools appear in the online directory. 

[See our Best Business Schools rankings.]

Quality Assessment (weighted by .40)

Peer Assessment Score (.25) In the fall of 2010, business school deans and directors of accredited master's programs in business were asked to rate programs on a scale from "marginal" (1) to "outstanding" (5). Those individuals who did not know enough about a school to evaluate it fairly were asked to mark "don't know." A school's score is the average of all the respondents who rated it. Responses of "don't know" counted neither for nor against a school. About 44 percent of those surveyed responded.

Recruiter Assessment Score (.15) In the fall of 2010, corporate recruiters and company contacts from M.B.A. programs previously ranked by U.S. News were asked to rate all full-time programs on a scale from "marginal" (1) to "outstanding" (5). Those individuals who did not know enough about a school to evaluate it fairly were asked to mark "don't know." A school's score is the average of all the respondents who rated it. Responses of "don't know" counted neither for nor against a school. About 21 percent of those surveyed responded. For the purpose of calculating this year's rankings, the two most recent years' recruiters' survey results were averaged and are weighed by .15.

Placement Success (weighted by .35)

Mean Starting Salary and Bonus (.14) The average starting salary and bonus of 2010 graduates of a full-time master's program in business. Salary figures are based on the number of graduates who reported data. The mean signing bonus is weighted by the proportion of those graduates who reported a bonus, because not everyone who reported a base salary figure reported a signing bonus.

Employment Rates for Full-time Master's Program in Business Graduates The employment rate for 2010 graduates of a full-time master's program in business. Those not seeking jobs or for whom no job-seeking information is available are excluded. If the proportions of graduates for whom no job-seeking information is available and who are not seeking jobs are high, then the information is not used in calculating the rankings. Employment rates at graduation (.07) and three months after graduation (.14) are used in the ranking model.

Student Selectivity (weighted by .25)

Mean GMAT Scores (.1625) The average Graduate Management Admission Test score of students entering the full-time program in fall 2010. Scores on the test range from 200 to 800.

Mean Undergraduate GPA (.075) The average undergraduate grade-point average of those students entering the full-time program in fall 2010.

Acceptance Rate (.0125) The percent of applicants to the full-time program in fall 2010 who were accepted.

Overall Rank: Data were standardized about their means, and standardized scores were weighted, totaled, and rescaled so that the top school received 100; others received their percentage of the top score. In order to be ranked, a full-time M.B.A. program had to have 20 or more graduates who were seeking employment in 2010. For a school to have its employment data considered in the ranking model, at least 50 percent of its 2010 full-time M.B.A. graduates needed to be seeking work. M.B.A. programs that did not meet the employment criteria are listed as Unranked (see below for explanation of Unranked).

Specialty Rankings: These rankings, including executive M.B.A., are based solely on ratings by business school deans and directors of accredited master's programs from the list of schools surveyed. They were asked to nominate up to 10 programs for excellence in each of the areas listed. Those schools receiving the most votes in each specialty are listed and are numerically ranked in descending order based on the number of nominations they received as long as the school/program receives seven or more nominations in that specialty area. This means that schools ranked at the bottom of each specialty ranking have received seven nominations.

Tags:
business school,
education,
rankings,
graduate schools

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

No MBA student cares what educators think about the quality of a school's MBA education. What students care about is what recruiters think. If recruiters are going to the school and having a good experience with their hires, they will go back for more. I liked how the Wall Street Journal did it years ago with their ranking survey only done by recruiters. They ranked the quality of the hires across a number of areas and could explain what they thought of each school. Really telling when the person hiring you says your school is lousy, or produces arrogant graduates, or does a good job preparing graduates for a team environment. That tells a potential MBA student a lot more than an academic praising research output (MBAs don't do research!!!).

Jimmy John of AZ 7:36PM March 24, 2011

Weights on peer and recruiter assessments should be reduced. They make the ranking more subjective than objective. In particular, the peer assessment part is dubious; if Dean of School A is a friend of Dean of School B, they will give each other high ratings --- how do we eliminiate such bias? Also, everyone will rate Harvard, Stanford, or Wharton highly just because of their brand names --- should we allow this to happen?

Besides, starting salaries need to be adjusted by the cost of living in their corresponding locations. $70,000 in San Francisco-CA and $70,000 in Madison-WI are very different amounts.

AL of WA 4:44PM March 21, 2011

Grad School Search

advertisement

Knowledge Centers

Looking at grad schools? Find out what you need to know.

The GRE® Tests: Get the Facts

Find out more about the new types of questions at takethegre.com.

The GRE® revised General Test features antonyms and analogies.

True

False

Submit
Answer: False

There are no antonyms and analogies on the GRE® revised General Test, so there’s no vocabulary out of context. Find out more about the new types of questions.

Parent Question-of-the-Day

What will be your primary resource to help pay for college?
[ View Results ]

Advance your career with an online degree