• Comment

Community College Students Unlikely to Benefit from Cheap Loans

Subsidies on college loans tend to help the least needy, some experts say.

May 11, 2012 RSS Feed Print
Barack Obama and Mitt Romney talk about student loan interest rates.

Student loan rates have become a hot topic for presidential candidates.

Keeping interest rates low on subsidized student loans is a key part of President Barack Obama's re-election campaign—and now Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney has jumped on the low-interest bandwagon. 

Obama has proposed keeping the interest rate of subsidized Stafford loans at 3.4 percent for another year, instead of letting the rate double to its previous level of 6.8 percent. Over the 10-year life of the loan, that should save a graduate roughly $9 a month, or a little more than $1,000 total. The federal government would forego $6 billion to keep the rate at 3.4 percent for another year. 

[Learn more about paying for college.] 

Cheap loans are good for affluent and middle-class students at four-year colleges and universities, but few community college students will benefit. Only 14 percent of community college students took out federal student loans in 2007-2008, the most recent year for which data are available, reports the Institute for College Access and Success

Those who borrow don't borrow very much: Ninety-five percent of community college borrowers owe less than $20,000, compared to a median debt of $25,000 for student borrowers at four-year institutions. 

Community college students, who tend to come from low- and moderate-income families, rely on need-based Pell grants, which, unlike loans, don't need to be repaid. And the Pell program is in trouble. 

This year, the maximum grant of $5,550 was preserved in a last-minute deal that cut grants for year-round students and restricted eligibility. Next year, the program faces a $7 billion shortfall. Advocates talk of Pell grants "going over the cliff." 

[Read about federal aid changes in 2012.] 

"Targeting a precious $6 billion right now to borrowers who have jobs and incomes high enough to cover the higher rate seems out of touch, especially when the Pell Grant program needs approximately that much next year to stave off a massive cut to the aid it provides," writes Jason Delisle, director of the Federal Education Budget Project at the New America Foundation in Washington, D.C. Stafford borrowers already can postpone payments if they fail to find work or earn too little, he notes. 

Furthermore, subsidized Stafford loans are based on family income and the cost of college. Students from wealthy families who go to very expensive private colleges can qualify for subsidized loans, while lower-income students often don't qualify if they've chosen low-cost public colleges, Delisle noted in an earlier post. 

"Some degree of pandering to various groups of voters is to be expected in any presidential election year," writes Matthew Chingos, a fellow in the Brown Center on Education Policy at the Brookings Institution. 

"But if Obama and Romney want to buy the votes of struggling college students, they should at least propose the more efficient path of increasing the grants that students receive when they attend college, not decreasing the interest they pay after they leave," he adds. 

[Learn about the high cost of low tuition at community colleges.]

Tags:
students,
community colleges,
loans,
student loans,
colleges,
education,
Pell grants,
paying for college,
interest rates,
paying for graduate school,
Barack Obama,
Mitt Romney

Reader Comments

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

College Search

Within miles of Advanced Search

advertisement

World's Best University Rankings

Knowledge Centers

Looking at colleges? Find out what you need to know.

Advance your career with an online degree

advertisement