How U.S. News Calculates the College Rankings

A number of schools switch ranking categories this year, and for-profits are ranked.

September 12, 2011 RSS Feed Print
Terrie Lin reads in the library at New York University.

Terrie Lin reads in the library at New York University.

Certainly, the host of intangibles that make up the college experience can't simply be measured by a series of data points. But for families concerned with finding the best academic value for their money, the 2012 edition of U.S. News Best Colleges rankings provides an excellent starting point for the college search. The rankings allow you to compare at a glance the relative quality of institutions based on such widely accepted indicators of excellence as freshman retention and graduation rates and the strength of the faculty. And as you check out the data for colleges already on your short list, you may discover unfamiliar schools with similar metrics, and thus broaden your options. 

Yes, many factors other than those spotlighted here will figure in your decision, including location and the feel of campus life; the range of academic offerings, activities, and sports; and cost and the availability of financial aid. But if you combine the information on this site with college visits, interviews, and your own intuition, our rankings can be a powerful tool in your quest for the right college. 

U.S. News has made some significant changes this year to the Best Colleges presentation and ranking methodology: 

1. Rankings categories have been updated: To sort colleges and universities into their appropriate ranking categories, we used the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching's Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education 2010 revisions to its highly respected Basic Classification. The Basic Classification is the traditional framework that Carnegie has used to classify colleges. The 2010 update was the first major category revision by Carnegie since 2006; that update was reflected in the 2008 Best Colleges rankings. 

As a result of this latest revision, many colleges have switched ranking categories (from National Liberal Arts to Regional Colleges, from Regional Colleges to National Liberal Arts, from Regional Universities to National Universities, or from National Universities to Regional Universities, for example) and some schools have been added to the rankings for the first time. In most cases, these category changes were the main explanation for the biggest movements in this year's Best Colleges rankings. 

The Carnegie classification has been the basis of the Best Colleges sorting system since our first ranking was published in 1983, given that it is used extensively as the basis for classifying schools by higher education researchers. For example, the U.S. Department of Education and many higher education associations use the system to organize their data and as the basis for research studies. In addition, in some cases, Carnegie Categories are used determine colleges' eligibility for grant money. 

In short, the Carnegie categories are the accepted standard in higher education. The ranking category names U.S. News uses are our own—National Universities, National Liberal Arts Colleges, Regional Universities, and Regional Colleges. Which U.S. News ranking category a school appears in is based solely on its Carnegie Basic classification category. 

2. All regionally accredited for-profit institutions that grant bachelor's degrees are included in the U.S. News data collection: For the first time, U.S. News has included in the rankings all for-profit colleges and universities that grant bachelor's degrees and are regionally accredited and that were eligible to be ranked based on whether they met the specific U.S. News criteria to be included in the rankings. The for-profits include many schools that have large online bachelor's degree programs. 

3. Non-responders are handled differently: In the case of colleges that have refused to fill out the U.S. News statistical survey for at least two years, and for schools new to the rankings that did not respond to our statistical survey, we have made extensive use of the statistical data those institutions were required to report to the U.S. Department of Education's National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) on such factors as SAT and ACT scores, acceptance rates, and faculty and retention rates. 

Tags:
methodology,
colleges,
rankings

Reader Comments Read all comments (20)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Alumni donations having any factor in this is ridiculous. It favors sports schools with booster programs or schools with the elite/legacy families (Ivies, etc). I attended a school that puts out a lot of teachers and social workers. These are critical people to the world and they do not have the money to donate to their alma mater. I personally loved my school and have the money to donate, but instead give to actual charities that need it. That bears no reflection on the quality of the education I had and, I would argue, actually shows I got a better education than someone from a school who learned somewhere along the line that donated to an already rich alma mater like Harvard or a sports school like Alabama. (and a lot of other criteria are crazy but I am leaving that to others)

William of MD 3:59PM April 28, 2012

I totally agree with the comments from J.Gal of Tx. As a scholar of ancient Greece, I can confirm that the HNWR (Helenic News and World Report) began using professor pay as part of the formula to rank the ancient Greek Universities. Now Greece has decline into to debt-ridden laughing stock of the European Union. Shame on you USNWR!

Andy L of NY 3:06PM April 14, 2012

This college rankings methodology is at the heart of what is wrong with America.

By using "professor pay" as one of the key metrics, colleges and universities have a direct financial incentive to inflate tuitions, increase the federal dependency of institutions of higher education, and decrease the freedoms of individual students. This creates a "culture of federal dependency" and also a "culture of government servitude", which shines as a bad example to the nation and the world and leads to casual attitudes towards the federal debt and inflation, not to mention individual liberties, which will eventually lead to the ruin of America, just as it has lead to the ruin of Greece.

Colleges and universities should, instead, be discouraged from federal dependency by widely watched rankings like this US News ranking. This will not only change the national debate about federal dependency, but it will also change the character of educated US citizens for the better.

The methodology used for MBA rankings seems more appropriate for college rankings. Issues like "percent of graduates employed", "pay rate of graduates", "satisfaction of graduates," "satisfaction of employers with graduates" are far more important than faculty pay grades.

As a Harvard College graduate myself, I am somewhat dissatisfied with the breadth of the curriculum that was offered to me in the late 1980's. For example, I was unable to find any courses on agriculture, a field of study which interested me greatly. Looking back on it, this was also a result of the federal dependency of the institution. The classes and fields of study that were emphasized by the college were dictated by Congress, via federal funding priorities, rather than by my own interests as a student and/or any general sense of obligation for offering a "full menu" of fields of study to young students who might like to explore a wide range of opportunities during their college years. In retrospect, I realize that Harvard's curriculum was not built for me. Rather, it was built to serve the socialist goals of the federal government. So, I believe that the college rankings should be altered to include a factor that measures the "breadth of curriculum."

Finally, and to re-emphasize the importance of decreasing federal dependency, colleges should be penalized for federal dependency, not rewarded for it via high professor salaries and higher rankings. The percentage of the operating budget paid by federal grants should be a penalizing factor, while colleges like College of the Ozarks, which have sworn off of federal funding 100%, should be rewarded by an elevated ranking and stature.

The importance of these rankings in shaping the character of our nation cannot be over-emphasized. At US News & World Report, you truly hold the future of America in your hands. Don't let America become the world's next Greece!

Jonathan L Gal of TX 6:54PM March 30, 2012

College Search

Within miles of Advanced Search

advertisement

Knowledge Centers

Looking at colleges? Find out what you need to know.

Parent Question-of-the-Day

What will be your primary resource to help pay for college?
[ View Results ]

Advance your career with an online degree

advertisement