The New Doctors in the House

April 15, 2010 RSS Feed Print

Nightingales are soaring. Gone are the days when medical etiquette had nurses standing at attention when doctors entered the room or silently bowing their white-capped heads when their own experience called a physician into question. Nurses have broken the bounds of their crisp, white aprons to assume substantial authority. Witness today's nurse practitioner addressing the critical shortage of primary-care physicians in the United States and other developed countries. These registered nurses, armed with advanced degrees in specialized areas like pediatrics, women's health, or adult disease management, care for a wide range of common medical conditions and wield a prescription pen with virtually the same independence as any M.D. 

[See our Best Health Schools rankings.] 

The founder of the modern nursing profession, Florence Nightingale, would be pleased. It was the unmet needs of soldiers dying like flies on foreign soil during the Crimean War that in 1854 led this young, highly educated British nurse and her team of like-minded women to volunteer their services at the war's front lines. More soldiers were dying from infectious diseases like typhus and cholera than from battlefield injuries. Nightingale systematically improved their diet, sanitation, clothes, and bedding and tended to their emotional needs. She became known as the Lady with the Lamp because of her nightly rounds to tend to her wounded charges. Mortality rates plummeted, and the nurses won the heartfelt respect of their patients, skeptical military doctors, and the public back home.

Need also propels today's evolution of nursing. We simply lack sufficient primary-care doctors to attend to the growing ranks of aging baby boomers and patients of all stripes who increasingly demand support with wellness and disease prevention. This shortage is particularly prevalent in rural America, where populations in more isolated areas can find barely half of the number of primary-care physicians they need. Nurse practitioners have stepped in to help fill this void.

This century has seen a steady increase in the number of N.P.'s—now more than 150,000 out of the 2.6 million registered nurses nationwide. Their ranks are sure to swell in numbers and stature: Nurse practitioners, along with physician assistants, figure prominently in healthcare reform as a way to increase access and lower costs. More and more nursing schools are offering doctoral-level training for N.P.'s. Today, 23 states authorize N.P.'s to work without physician involvement. Expansion of the doctor of nursing practice degree will probably make that 50.

Advanced care. Trained to take medical histories and perform physical examinations, N.P.'s screen for disease risks and diagnose and treat the common complaints that make up 80 percent of primary care. They can manage chronic diseases like asthma and high blood pressure, with outcomes similar to physicians'. N.P.'s can work as midwives or lead home health or hospice teams. Others with advanced training in cancer or heart disease might work in specialists' practices overseeing treatments and attending to patients' primary-care needs.

As in most fields, advanced training brings higher salaries. R.N.'s can earn between $45,000 and $95,000 a year; nurse practitioners, between $80,000 and $120,000. As with nursing generally, the hours are regulated and controllable, with flexible shifts that accommodate personal life.

Some M.D.'s will be threatened by this new breed of doctor in the medical house. But with fewer medical students choosing primary care, nurses are moving into a gap rather than pushing out existing physicians. And as we've seen with midwifery, there are patients who prefer the care of an N.P.

As in the past, nurses are recasting their profession to meet pressing needs, not by morphing into M.D.'s but by being nurses plus. Their inbred professional focus on team collaboration and their attention to the whole patient and to the surrounding environment of home and community are well suited for primary care. If physicians are uncomfortable ceding territory to their new colleagues, like the military doctors facing the Lady with the Lamp, it will be so only at first. The need for N.P.'s is great, and nurses have long shown how to shine.

Tags:
graduate schools,
medical school,
health,
medicine

Reader Comments Read all comments (138)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I find it appalling that you can even comment that a "nurse" is a "physician" or aka "the new doctors". It is insulting to a profession that exudes a skill level, commitment and knowledge base unparalleled to many... Most college graduates cannot even enter the MCAt steps let alone achieve a score worthy of acceptance. I am not even addressing the financial commitment. The process begins with a 4.0 in college, then MCATs, then community service and extracurricular excellence, then medical school, then USMLE scores above the 90th percentile, then residency from the minimum of 3 years to 9 with and without research at times. A nurse has his or her valued place. Now please recognize the place of a physician.

Anesthesiologist of CT 2:44PM December 14, 2011

A NP is not a physician and we are not trained to be one. NP's must have a master in nursing science, certain amount of clinical practice hours, pass a certifying exam before the are allowed to practice. I read a comment about nurses are not trained to do differential diagnosis. I don't know what year or curriculum you looked at to obtain your information. As a nursing educator at a university we do teach in the NP and in the clinical nurse specialist program how to use critical thinking and make differential diagnosis. We also teach them their scope of -practice and to have the knowledge to refer to a physician when she is not capable of handling the patient's condition. We start teaching critical thinking at the BSN level and this carries on through all nursing degrees. Studies have shown that NP's take much longer with patients and are more concerned with a patients condition for the lack of a better word. NP's are able to increase the patient load of a physicians office and as always the physician is the one to gain monetarily for having a NP work in the office with him. In certain states where they can work with an independent license they are allowed to have a DEA number. Yes, NP's do not have all the years of study as physicians, but they do get the training and theory they need to practice and make differential diagnosis. Many NP's or nurses going to obtain their MSN or PhD's are above the age of 29. They have had a good deal of bedside nursing and many hours of patient care, seminars and education behind their belt. Good experience, patience, and the knowledge one acquires makes NP's a better generalist. Remember they can also specialize in other areas of NP practice. The newer physicians that Colleges of Medicine are pumping out learn to work in collaborative relationships with advanced health care professionals. Some even use NP's for "mini-consults and advice on treatment. So to physicians that feel threatened having NP's in the workforce, don't be. We are here to help patients get better care, in a timely manner, leaving a physician's valuable time to take care of more complex situations that the NP is able to treat.

Bob of FL 3:42AM October 23, 2011

To Dr. Nurse - That is great that you felt the need to be a doctor of medicine. NP's are not doctors and most do not want to be doctors. NP's are limited to non-complex patient care, so I don't know why you have such a problem with the classification. The field of doctors wanting to take care of patients that don't require a specialty is dwindling and we are facing a shortage especially in rural and underserved areas.

This is where the NP role is flourishing. A competent NP will know when he/she is in over her head and will refer those most difficult patients to the proper physician. Being a NP allows nurses to take care of their patients at a more thorough level than they ever could do at the bedside. Many NP's are above the age that would permit them to attend medical school as you did and so settle to work under-appreciated as nurses always do.

I am sorry that you feel that way about your former colleagues. Why don't you help out and spread some of your new found knowledge our way to help the situation improve patient care, rather than belittling what the rest of us do to take care of the patients you don't have time for?

As society progresses and patient numbers continue to escalate - their will always be a need for underlings to advance to the next level. We have seen this in nursing; hence the roles of LPN and CNA's. Now we have med aides who are not even nurses that pass meds - how do you feel about that? It is the way society responds to necessity. When tasks become too much for one group to handle, a new group is created to ease the burden. This is what has happened in medicine and who more qualified to ease it than advanced degree nurses who are used to the system? I would rather it be a nurse than a non-medical person trained to work solely under a doctor! This just seems to be about a lot of over-blown ego's who can't stand it when someone else has the opportunity to utilize their knowledge and skills. If NP's begin to fail, then perhaps they will offer more rigorous training in the future. But since that hasn't happened yet, they must be doing something right!!

S. Williams of IA 9:46PM October 01, 2011

College Search

Within miles of Advanced Search

advertisement

Knowledge Centers

Looking at colleges? Find out what you need to know.

Parent Question-of-the-Day

What will be your primary resource to help pay for college?
[ View Results ]

Advance your career with an online degree

advertisement