Do Division III Schools Give Athletic Scholarships?

Many students hope their athletic skills will be more valuable in the lower-profile division

July 17, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (10)

SAN ANTONIO—Only about 2 percent of high school athletes are offered even a small sports scholarship from a Division I or Division II college. As a result, many high school athletes who are realistic about their chances sometimes hope their speed and strength might win them a "leadership" or similarly euphemistic scholarship from one of the 444 Division III colleges (mostly expensive private schools) that aren't supposed to lure game-winners with money.

But that's not realistic either, says Eric M. Hartung, associate director of research for the NCAA.

The NCAA has figured out such dodges. It bars college coaches from even "indirectly influencing" scholarship decisions at Division III schools. That means a call, or even a wink, from a coach to a financial aid officer shouldn't improve a student's odds of winning a grant. "The coach can tell the student who to call" in the financial aid office to apply for aid, "but that's it," Hartung said.

To keep everyone honest, the NCAA requires each Division III school to report how much money it gives to students who play sports and how much money it gives to nonathletes. Those numbers show that athletes at Division III schools, on average, aren't getting significantly more money than nonathletes. Sports players make up 21 percent of the student body at Division III schools, he said. In recent years, the NCAA has found that athletes receive 22 percent of all the scholarship dollars handed out by Division III schools.

If a Division III university offers a "leadership" scholarship, it cannot consider factors such as team captainship, Hartung said. As a result, he said, some colleges are now telling applicants not to include athletic accomplishments on such scholarship applications.

The NCAA has even cracked down on seemingly innocuous scholarship programs such as those targeted at Canadians. At one school, a disproportionate number of the Canadians happened to play hockey, so the NCAA objected, Hartung said.

Hartung acknowledges these rules can be very tough on coaches, who tend to be competitive and want to attract the best athletes. And it can be tough on students who are considering several offers and want to leverage their talents to reduce the cost of tuition.

Despite the seemingly watertight rules and scrutiny, there is a little wiggle room. And a few schools have been wriggling toward—and perhaps beyond—the rule limits.

The NCAA generally doesn't start an investigation of scholarship violations unless the school's reports raise a flag, such as showing that athletes as a group receive about 8 percent more than nonathletes. Would the NCAA investigate a college that, say, gave athletes, on average, about 5 percent more than other students? Probably not, Hartung says. But he said he didn't think colleges were so calculating and nefarious as to systematically tweak their scholarships just a little less than the NCAA would notice.

And an investigation by itself wouldn't necessarily cause problems for schools, since colleges can clear themselves by showing that they had good reasons for any disparities. They also must show the NCAA that they provide no systematic advantage for players, such as having coaches sit on scholarship committees.

A handful of schools have been found to have violated the rules. But most of the violations were judged to be "inadvertent," so the NCAA settled the probes privately and simply required the schools to prove that they had fixed their scholarship systems.

In August, however, the NCAA will rule on three Division III schools that are being investigated for systematically giving more scholarship money to athletes. If determined to have committed "major," or willful, violations, the NCAA will issue press releases naming the colleges and describing the violations. Hartung said the NCAA will decide next month whether any additional punishment is required. But, he said, NCAA members have urged the association to limit the punishment to the public shaming.

Tags:
NCAA,
college athletics,
education,
scholarships,
paying for college

Reader Comments Read all comments (10)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I have a 6'6", 295 lb., OT who has the SIZE but I have found that most Division I and Division II schools won't look at him because he is not "strong enough" or they don't bother looking at the High School because of the 1-9 record for two years straight. Do NOT put too much stock in getting any scholarship help. It seems like it is a "system" if you know what I mean. We have worked our butts off calling coaches, sending tapes, hiring NCSA, going onto GoBig and berecruited. It is a racket is seems and in one injury it can be GONE. Grades are tops, of course, and the education must be what it is all about.

Judy of FL 10:30AM March 19, 2013

I have a 6'2" 258 lb. Grandson who's a junior in high school. He plays defensive tackle and lead the defensive line in fumbles forced, tackles and assists this season, even though he was double-teamed most of the time. He has a couple of div. I schools looking at him, and he wants to play in college, but he doesn't have enough faith in himself to try for a spot with them. Instead he's decided to go the Div III route. To save himself the hassle.

Ken of NY 10:02AM February 16, 2013

Unfortunately, not all kids playing Div I or II are there because they have the talent! Some are, but some are there just because they have the size and the college "hopes" to develop them into the position. Kids who have all the talent and stats to back it up, but are what the colleges deam to be undersized don't even get a chance. My son lead Hillsborough County, FL in sacks his senior year, all county and lead his team in tackles. However, because of his position as DE and 5'11" the DI schools told him, "We love what you do, you're just too small". One offered walk on status, some DII schools offered scholarships but they were with losing programs in the middle of nowhere. My son decided to go to a DIII school where he would have a chance at winning a National Championship, developing as a player and someday coach. These kids play because they have the talent and heart to play the game they love! They aren't "getting paid" to play like DI and DII kids on scholarships. They may not fit the "big in stature" mold that these DI/DII schools are looking for, but they have the heart and talent! Let's win another National Championship this year!!!

kim of FL 9:21AM September 16, 2012

College Search

Within miles of Advanced Search

advertisement

World's Best University Rankings

Knowledge Centers

Looking at colleges? Find out what you need to know.

Advance your career with an online degree

advertisement