Social Sciences and Humanities Rankings Methodology

How we rank programs in social sciences and the humanities

April 22, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (9)

Rankings of doctoral programs in the social sciences and humanities are based solely on the results of peer assessment surveys sent to academics in each discipline. Each school offering a doctoral program was sent two surveys (with the exception of criminology, where each school received four). The questionnaires asked respondents to rate the academic quality of the program at each institution on a 5-point scale: outstanding (5), strong (4), good (3), adequate (2), or marginal (1). Individuals who were unfamiliar with a particular school's programs were asked to select "don't know." Scores for each school were determined by computing a trimmed mean (eliminating the two highest and the two lowest responses) of the ratings of all respondents who rated that school; average scores were then sorted in descending order.

Surveys were conducted in the fall of 2008 by Synovate. Questionnaires were sent to department heads and directors of graduate studies (or, alternatively, a senior faculty member who teaches graduate students) at schools that had granted a total of five or more doctorates in each discipline during the five-year period from 2001 through 2005, as indicated by the 2006 Survey of Earned Doctorates. The American Association of Doctoral Programs in Criminology and Criminal Justice provided the list of criminology programs and the respondent names of those surveyed at those programs. The surveys asked about Ph.D. programs in criminology (response rate: 90 percent), economics (34 percent), English (31 percent), history (23 percent), political science (37 percent), psychology (25 percent), and sociology (43 percent).

The American Psychological Association supplied the names of the psychology programs. This list was then narrowed to have each school represented once on the survey—usually by the department of psychology—even for schools that grant a doctoral degree in psychology in multiple departments. Programs in clinical psychology are ranked separately in the health professions section. Specialty rankings are based solely on nominations by department heads and directors of graduate studies at peer schools from the list of schools surveyed. They ranked up to 10 programs in each area offering the best programs in each of those specialty areas. Those with the most votes appear.

Tags:
graduate schools,
rankings,
methodology

Reader Comments Read all comments (9)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I feel extremely disappointed and let down because of US News's decision not to include top anthropology programs in its rankings this year. I am a rising junior who is extremely interested in pursuing a PhD in Anthropology or Archaeology and it would have been very nice to see what some of the best programs in the US are.

Robert S. Turchick of PA 6:46PM June 02, 2010

These rankings, especially for the humanities, are useless. The response rates are pathetic and this is an obvious sign that professors do not take seriously these rankings that the US News publishes. Moreover, I am glad that US News does not offer rankings for Anthropology given that there is no need for doing so and students should take more important factors into account, such as faculty interests, resources, location, graduate student research and composition, special programs, etc.

JHU of DC 1:21PM December 23, 2009

Where is art history and anthropology?

Adewale adenle of LA 7:48PM November 28, 2009

College Search

Within miles of Advanced Search

advertisement

World's Best University Rankings

Knowledge Centers

Looking at colleges? Find out what you need to know.

Advance your career with an online degree

advertisement