Will Newt Gingrich Do the GOP More Harm Than Good by Staying in the 2012 Race? >
Competitive Primary Is Healthy—Look at Obama's in 2008
Democrats united behind Obama after long, messy primary—Republicans can do the same
February 1, 2012
About Doug Heye:
A veteran of political campaigns throughout the country since 1990, Doug Heye has served in leading communications positions in the House of Representatives and United States Senate, as well as serving in the George W. Bush administration. Most recently he was the communications director for the Republican National Committee. He is currently a Washington-based GOP communications strategist.
Throughout this process, many have argued that Republican voters do not like their candidates and that the fight for the GOP nomination will leave a tattered, divided party.
This is silly.
Let's look at recent history. In the 2008 Iowa caucuses, a majority of Democrats supported candidates Hillary Clinton, John Edwards, and others over their eventual nominee. Clinton supporters did not like Barack Obama, a feeling that was, and remains, mutual. That Hillary Clinton then won in New Hampshire was not a sign of a schizophrenic party, merely that the process was continuing as it always had.
[Check out our editorial cartoons on President Obama.]
In 2008, the Democrats were engaged in a long, divisive, expensive, and, let's not forget, personal battle. Who can forget Rep. James Clyburn and former President Bill Clinton arguing over who played the "race card" on whom, or leading Clinton surrogate, now Democratic National Committee chairwoman, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz echoing Republican talking points over Barack Obama's lack of experience? This fight went all the way to the DNC's rules committee, where Clinton supporters chanted "Denver! Denver!" in hopes of taking the fight to the national convention. Yes, we've conveniently forgotten that many Democrats we're willing, if not eager, to take from Barack Obama the nomination he earned.
What happened? Despite all of this, Democrats united and won the White House. Similarly, Republicans will unite behind our nominee because nothing unites the party more than the prospect of defeating Barack Obama so we can repeal ObamaCare, end annual trillion-dollar deficits, both desperately needed to fix our economy, and put America back on the right track.
The 2008 Democratic primary demonstrated that long, competitive primaries can be a good thing. This should be no surprise for Republicans. After all, we believe competition is healthy.
- See pictures of the 2012 GOP candidates.
- Join the debate on Facebook.
- Follow U.S. News Debate Club on Twitter.
- Other Arguments
-
#1368
No — The struggle between Romney and Gingrich is for the soul of the Republican Party--a battle the GOP must have
MATTHEW DICKINSON, Professor at Middlebury College
-
#22513
No — Gingrich is the only one in the race who has a chance of uniting conservatives behind the GOP
JUDSON PHILLIPS, Founder of Tea Party Nation
-
#42217
No — Newt Gingrich should stay in the race, as he is making the field stronger overall
FORD O'CONNELL, Republican Strategist, Conservative Activist, and Political Analyst
-
#51211
Yes — Newt Gingrich is already causing problems for the GOP
LARA BROWN, Professor at Villanova University
-
#51716
Yes — Unless he truly has a plan to turn the tide vs. Romney, Gingrich should bow to help defeat Obama
RON BONJEAN, Former Chief of Staff for the Senate Republican Conference
-
#7912
Yes — The Newt Gingrich-Mitt Romney mudfest is turning independents away from the GOP
KRYSTAL BALL, MSNBC Contributor and Former Democratic Nominee for Congress in the First District of Virginia
Reader Comments Read all comments (1)
Brandon Wilkes of NJ 9:16PM March 18, 2012