Debate Club

Was The Iraq War Worth It? >

This Was No War of Choice

Arab culture is not the problem; absence of rule-of-law is

November 11, 2011

About Michael Rubin:

Michael Rubin is a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute. His major research area is the Middle East, with special focus on Iran, Iraq, Turkey, and Kurdish society. He also writes frequently on transformative diplomacy and governance issues.

The cost of the Iraq war was high. Almost 4,500 American servicemen and women died, and many more were injured. American taxpayers paid billions of dollars. Was the Iraq war worth it? Yes.

Despite pre-war intelligence failures, the facts remain: Saddam Hussein started two wars, used chemical weapons, and subsidized suicide bombers. Saddam's lieutenants believed he had weapons of mass destruction and would use them. This was no war of choice: Sanctions had collapsed; containment failed. Had President Bush not unseated the Iraqi leader, Iraqi documents show Saddam would have reconstituted his unconventional weapons programs.

[Moving Forward from 9/11]

Nor was the decision to pursue democracy in post-Saddam Iraq wrong. One-in-six Iraqis had fled Saddam's Iraq. These refugees had no trouble accepting democracy in the United States or Europe. Arab culture is not the problem; absence of rule-of-law is.

Iraq's liberation reverberated throughout the region. Before Saddam's fall, dictators used the Arab-Israeli conflict to deflect attention from their own failings. Iraq's transformation sparked debate about democracy. Autocrats tried to associate reform with chaos. It did not work. While Arab intellectuals condemned the invasion, they debated American mistakes not to delegitimize democracy but to improve it. Democracy in Iraq was no fool's dream. Bush deserves credit for changing Arab political debate and presaging the Arab Spring.

Certainly, mistakes blighted reconstruction. Rather than help the Iraqi government reconstitute itself and leave, Americans wasted billions of dollars trying to run the country themselves. That parts of Iraq boom today have less to do with American aid, and more to do with Iraqi resourcefulness. Democratization may be wise, but foreign assistance is not if it fuels corruption.

Naïve faith in diplomacy also hampered Iraq's rebound. Iraq's neighbors never sought a stable, secure Iraq, and waste no effort to spoil the new Iraq's potential. Iraqis paid with their lives for the State Department's naïve belief in the sincerity of Iraq's neighbors.

[Obama Fulfills Campaign Promise in Declaring Iraq War Over]

Critics castigate Bush for involving America in a war they say was unnecessary, expensive, and poorly planned. President Harry S Truman faced the same criticisms for the Korean War. Time proved Truman's critics wrong, as juxtaposition of North and South Korea demonstrates.

Alas, Truman's successors understood that success required long-term commitment. Our true mistake is the severance of any real partnership with Iraq. It is this abandonment—symbolized by the December 2011 withdrawal, that truly snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.

Tags:
Iraq war (2003-2011),
Iraq,
Saddam Hussein
Other Arguments
#1

No — Expensive, deadly effort did not make the U.S. any safer

PHYLLIS BENNIS, Director of the New Internationalism Project at the Institute for Policy Studies

#2
#3

No — The "democracy" mission in Iraq served primarily as a justification for U.S. forces

DANIEL J. GALLINGTON, Senior Policy and Program Adviser at the George C. Marshall Institute

#5

Yes — Hussein ordered the deaths of more people in the Middle East than any leader since the Mongol invasion

JAMES PHILLIPS, Senior Research Fellow for Middle Eastern Affairs at the Heritage Foundation

#6

Yes — The Iraq war freed the world of a dangerous, determined, and irrational leader

ABRAHAM SOFAER, George P. Shultz Distinguished Scholar and Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

We do agree Democracy is more successful when acquired by those who seek the same. The "Arab Spring is more a result of Wall Street and Madison Ave. brought to the world via the internet and cellular communication than any debate spurred by the Iraqi war. History will show the leader of the Republican Party drugged his country into a war that has help to devastate the economic well being of the people that fought and supported his choice. Lest not forget The Korean War was fought with the authority of the United Nations.

William Curtis of CO 1:47PM November 15, 2011

It seems something of a paradox to me that Mr. Rubin says that the rule-of-law is missing in the Arab culture. I believe that one of the tenets of international law is national sovereignty. In 2003, Hussein had committed no action against the US that would justify violation of Iraq's sovereignty by a military invasion. So, at what point do we say that we in the US also violate the rule-of-law when it is convenient for our national policy?

And why didn't we continue the armed intervention in Iraq in 1991 when there was justification according to international law? In the words of Dick Cheney, then Secretary of Defense, "And the question in my mind is, how many additional American casualties is Saddam (Hussein) worth? And the answer is, not that damned many. So, I think we got it right, both when we decided to expel him from Kuwait, but also when the President made the decision that we'd achieved our objectives and we were not going to go get bogged down in the problems of trying to take over and govern Iraq."

Weren't these still salient questions in 2003?

Mike of NC 8:24AM November 14, 2011

Did we not provide Saddam Hussein biological weapons that he used against Iran and the Kurds ?

Russel of MA 2:32PM November 13, 2011

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.


Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.


You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
Obama's Remarkable Silence on Latin American Press Abuses

President Obama's silence on press freedom in Latin America is troubling.

Why the Media Is Giving Romney a Pass on Trump's Birtherism

Why the media hasn't pressed Mitt Romney about Donald Trump's birther fantasies.

Romney's Bain Experience Wasn't Real American Capitalism

The fact that Bain Capital served to make money for investors, not to create jobs, could endanger Romney.

Why Is Mitt Romney Embracing Birther Donald Trump?

Maybe Trump is Romney's idea of a rich guy that common people can relate to?

Does Barack Obama Actually Want to Be Re-Elected?

The president's lack of enthusiasm jeopardizes his campaign.

3 Reasons Why the Scott Walker Wisconsin Recall Election Matters

Scott Walker is a canary in a coal mine.

The Right's Fixation With 'Vetting' Obama

American voters can use the past four years to judge Obama's qualifications as president

Voters Tuning Out Flood of 2012 Super PAC, Campaign Ads

This will be the year of grassroots voters, not Nielsen families.

Advertisement