Debate Club

Was The Iraq War Worth It? >

The Iraq War Unnecessarily Prolonged the Conflict in Afghanistan

It enhanced the narrative that the U.S. seeks to conquer and occupy Muslim countries

November 11, 2011

About Lawrence J. Korb:

Lawrence J. Korb, a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, served as assistant secretary of defense in the Reagan administration.

An objective analysis that compares the costs of the war in Iraq with the benefits, something the Bush administration unfortunately did not do before its mindless, needless, senseless invasion, makes it clear that the Iraq war was not worth it.

The costs in blood and treasure are horrendous. Over the past eight and a half years, approximately 4,500 brave servicemen and women have lost their lives; another 32,000 have suffered physical wounds, and several hundred thousand psychological wounds, which have led to exponential increases in suicide, divorce, and spousal abuse rates.

[Moving Forward from 9/11]

In addition, millions of Iraqis have been killed, wounded, or displaced.

The direct financial cost to the U.S. taxpayer is about $1 trillion while the total cost, including caring for the wounded veterans and borrowing the money, will bring the total costs to between $3 trillion and $4 trillion, exacerbating our already massive federal debt.

But there are other costs as well. By invading Iraq before the task in Afghanistan was finished, we allowed the Taliban to regroup and unnecessarily prolonged that conflict, causing us to expend more blood and treasure. Moreover, by invading Iraq under false pretenses, we enhanced the al Qaeda and Iranian narrative that the U.S. seeks to conquer and occupy Muslim countries. This not only attracted new members to al Qaeda but enhanced the influence of Iran in the region.

[Dick Cheney's Book Is Less Memoir Than Caricature]

What did we gain? Not much. The Iraqi people have not resolved their political differences, nor are they grateful for the blood and treasure we spilled to rid them of Saddam Hussein. In fact, on June 30, 2009, when American troops were forced to withdraw to their bases under the Status of Forces Agreement, Iraqi Prime Minister Maliki proclaimed triumphantly, "We have repelled the invaders." The power and influence of Iran, a much bigger strategic threat to the United States, has been increased. Prime Minister Maliki spent the Saddam years in Iran, and it was the Iranians who persuaded Moqtada al-Sadr, the radical Sadrist cleric, to support Maliki in forming a government and who persuaded him not to allow Americans to remain after December 2011. Finally, the Iraqi government supports Iran and opposes U.S. policy in the region. Currently it is supporting Iran's ally, the brutal Syrian dictator Assad, and in the 2006 war with Israel, it supported Hezbollah.

Marine Gen. Anthony Zinni, who commanded CENTCOM until 2000, argued before the invasion of Iraq that Saddam was contained and gravely weakened and that an invasion would be "a bay of goats." The Bush administration should have listened.

Tags:
Iraq,
Iraq war (2003-2011),
Saddam Hussein
Other Arguments
#1

No — Expensive, deadly effort did not make the U.S. any safer

PHYLLIS BENNIS, Director of the New Internationalism Project at the Institute for Policy Studies

#3

No — The "democracy" mission in Iraq served primarily as a justification for U.S. forces

DANIEL J. GALLINGTON, Senior Policy and Program Adviser at the George C. Marshall Institute

#4

Yes — Arab culture is not the problem; absence of rule-of-law is

MICHAEL RUBIN, Resident Scholar at the American Enterprise Institute

#5

Yes — Hussein ordered the deaths of more people in the Middle East than any leader since the Mongol invasion

JAMES PHILLIPS, Senior Research Fellow for Middle Eastern Affairs at the Heritage Foundation

#6

Yes — The Iraq war freed the world of a dangerous, determined, and irrational leader

ABRAHAM SOFAER, George P. Shultz Distinguished Scholar and Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.

Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.

You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
Organizations Masquerading as Tax-Exempt is the Real IRS Scandal

The real scandal at the IRS is electioneering groups getting tax-exempt status.

E.W. Jackson Proves the Tea Party Learned Nothing

By nominating E.W. Jackson, Virginia Republicans hope extremism will save them.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Are Not Obama Scandals

The word "scandal" doesn't appropriately describe anything going on in Washington these days.

Democrats Should Be Worried About Polls After Obama Scandals

Democrats should be more worried about President Obama's approval ratings.

Tea Party IRS Rally Should Wait Until After Moore Tornado Recovery

Tea party rallies against the IRS should wait until the tornado victims are taken care of.

God Bless America and the Boy Scouts

The Fund does the right thing by pushing the Boy Scouts to lift its ban on gay members.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Show the Failure of Obama's Big Government

Giving an inefficient organization like the IRS more responsibility makes it more likely to screw up, not better able to solve this nation’s problems.

Coburn Wants Oklahoma Tornado Aid Offset With Budget Cuts

Oklahoma Senator Tom Coburn wants spending cuts before aid is sent to tornado victims in his own state.

Advertisement