Debate Club

Should Women Be Allowed to Fight in Combat? >

Policy Is Finally Catching Up With the Reality of Women in Combat

Servicewomen suffered from the old policy—and so did our military

January 25, 2013

About Ariela Migdal:

Ariela Migdal is senior staff attorney with the ACLU Women's Rights Project.

Should women be able to fight in combat? Women already do serve in combat, and now policy is catching up to that reality.

Over the past decade, women have served in large numbers at the tip of the spear—living in combat outposts in sparse conditions, going on patrol with infantry units (that are formally closed to women), taking fire, and fighting back when necessary. Yet the 1994 combat exclusion policy officially barred commanders from assigning women to direct ground combat units. The policy prevented commanders from assigning their most qualified personnel to missions, regardless of gender. As a result, women like the four servicewomen we represent in the lawsuit Hegar v. Panetta had the opportunity to put their lives on the line, and two were awarded the Purple Heart, but many combat units, leadership positions, and training programs remained closed to them—they hit a brass ceiling. Women found themselves patrolling alongside units that were, on paper, closed to them, without having trained with those units. Servicewomen suffered, and so did our military.

[See a collection of political cartoons on defense spending.]

All Americans should welcome the historic announcement that our nation will now remove one of the last categorical exclusions of women and that women will have the opportunity to contribute and serve in any position for which they are qualified. Commanders' hands will no longer be tied by an archaic policy grounded in outdated ideas of combat and of women's capacities. I hope that the Pentagon will not waste any time in implementing the total elimination of the combat exclusion policy, so that our armed services can assign the best of the best without regard to gender. The many servicewomen who have returned from difficult deployments in Iraq and Afghanistan will be keeping a close eye on the implementation of the change in policy, and won't settle for anything less than a full opportunity to compete for official participation in combat units.

Tags:
Department of Defense,
War in Afghanistan (2001-),
military
Other Arguments
#1

Yes — Lifting the combat ban is a sign of the military's evolution

KATIE MILLER, Special Assistant at the Center for American Progress

#3
#4
#5

Yes — Women serving our country deserve equal rights

RACHEL NATELSON, Legal Director of the Service Women's Action Network

#6

Yes — Women with skills for ground combat should be steered towards other parts of the military

MICHAEL O'HANLON, Director of Research for Brookings's 21st Century Defense Initiative

Reader Comments ()

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.

Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.

You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
Oklahoma Tornado Reminds Us of the Value of Teachers

The Oklahoma tornado reminds us of all the roles teachers take on.

IRS, AP and James Rosen Scandals Strike at the First Amendment

The Obama scandals paint a picture of an administration at odds with the First Amendment.

Anthony Weiner Is Too Liberal to Be New York City Mayor

New York City doesn't need another Democratic mayor.

Organizations Masquerading as Tax-Exempt is the Real IRS Scandal

The real scandal at the IRS is electioneering groups getting tax-exempt status.

E.W. Jackson Proves the Tea Party Learned Nothing

By nominating E.W. Jackson, Virginia Republicans hope extremism will save them.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Are Not Obama Scandals

The word "scandal" doesn't appropriately describe anything going on in Washington these days.

Democrats Should Be Worried About Polls After Obama Scandals

Democrats should be more worried about President Obama's approval ratings.

Tea Party IRS Rally Should Wait Until After Moore Tornado Recovery

Tea party rallies against the IRS should wait until the tornado victims are taken care of.

Advertisement