Mandatory Drug Testing Demonizes and Demoralizes

The assumption that people on public assistance use drugs at a higher rate than the general population is erroneous

Reader Comments

Back to argument

I need aid currently, I had become displaced not having employment or opportunities for employment and also in need for housing so as a low income minority person I really suffer hard. I never used drugs and never will but I am shuttled and huddled in the mix and treated as a user because I am unemployed and homeless too.

c in NYS of NY 3:52PM January 13, 2012

I don't understand how this requirement "demonizes and demoralizes" applicants! There are a number of eligibility requirements for public assistance, why can't being drug free just be a requirement?! I receive aid and would not be offended if I had to take a drug test! I had to take one to qualify for many employment positions, what's the difference? Its totally ridiculous that this is offensive!!

Angelic of CA 10:48PM January 06, 2012

yes - its like one law maker has said "employers drug test.....why then when someone is getting assistance can't they also be drug tested?" yes the economy is bad and heightened unemployment and families in desperate need, but I myself had to go to my local DHS for assistance a couple of years ago and would say 60% of class I was in to further my job training were active drug and alcohol users and admitted to only taking the training to satisfy their caseworkers and get a check! So I personally think its valid, people should have seen the sweating and panic ridden people when random drug test days were up!

Steph Jensen of OR 7:52PM January 06, 2012

Whatever fantasy/politically correct world has invoked such opinions as "welfare recipients are no more likely to have drug problems than anyone else," and that testing.."perpetuates myths..." Wow...it must be nice to have never lived in the real world out here where you see this on a daily basis around you. Those of us who do live here know what reality is.

Jeanie of SC 11:41AM December 23, 2011

<1 2 3 4

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.
About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.

Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.

You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
IRS, AP and James Rosen Scandals Strike at the First Amendment

The Obama scandals paint a picture of an administration at odds with the First Amendment.

Anthony Weiner Is Too Liberal to Be New York City Mayor

New York City doesn't need another Democratic mayor.

Organizations Masquerading as Tax-Exempt is the Real IRS Scandal

The real scandal at the IRS is electioneering groups getting tax-exempt status.

E.W. Jackson Proves the Tea Party Learned Nothing

By nominating E.W. Jackson, Virginia Republicans hope extremism will save them.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Are Not Obama Scandals

The word "scandal" doesn't appropriately describe anything going on in Washington these days.

Democrats Should Be Worried About Polls After Obama Scandals

Democrats should be more worried about President Obama's approval ratings.

Tea Party IRS Rally Should Wait Until After Moore Tornado Recovery

Tea party rallies against the IRS should wait until the tornado victims are taken care of.

God Bless America and the Boy Scouts

The Fund does the right thing by pushing the Boy Scouts to lift its ban on gay members.

Advertisement