Debate Club

Should There Be More Quantitative Easing? >

We Need Quantitative Easing to Raise Employment

Quantitative easing would give the government more money to create jobs

July 20, 2012

About Mark Weisbrot:

Mark Weisbrot is co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research.

The Federal Reserve needs to do more to help create employment in the United States, because we have more than 23 million people who are unemployed, underemployed, or have given up looking for work. This is the most important national economic problem, because it damages and even ruins millions of peoples' lives. Additional quantitative easing could help, but it needs to be combined with further measures that the Fed can and should take.

Chief among these is for the Fed to target a higher rate of inflation, as a number of economists including Paul Krugman and Dean Baker have argued. The Fed's current target of 2 percent is too low. A higher expected (but still quite reasonable) rate of inflation, e.g. 3 or even 4 percent, would convince many investors that it is too costly to park their money in cash or near-cash equivalents. This would increase investment and employment. A higher inflation rate would also improve the situation of millions of homeowners, as the value of their homes would rise while—for most—mortgage payments would remain fixed. Other debtors would also see a reduction in their real debt burden, which would stimulate spending. It must be remembered the main cause of America's economic weakness right now (with growth slowing again this year) is inadequate demand.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the economy.]

More quantitative easing and a higher inflation target would also boost the economy by lowering the value of the dollar against other currencies, thereby reducing imports and increasing exports. Also, when the Fed creates money to buy U.S. debt—as it has to the tune of $2.3 trillion since 2008—it reduces the net debt burden of the federal government, because the interest payments on that debt go back to the U.S. Treasury. The most effective policy would have the Federal government use this additional fiscal space to spend more money to directly create jobs, including aid to state and local governments that have been reducing employment. But superstition and political nonsense about the debt, as well as about inflation, has so far triumphed over basic accounting and economics.

Of course, there is a limit to what another round of QE can do by itself, with long-term interest rates (including home mortgage rates) at record lows. That is why other measures, including a higher inflation target and expansionary fiscal policy, are needed.

Corrected on 7/20/12: A previous version of this blog post had an incorrect headline.

Tags:
debt,
Federal Reserve,
economy
Other Arguments
#1
#2

No — Corporations need a stable economic environment, not more funds

MARK CALABRIA, Director of Financial Regulation Studies at the Cato Institute

#3

Yes — The Fed should use its power to grease the wheels of investment

ADAM HERSH, Economist at the Center for American Progress

#4

No — Bernanke should wait to fire on quantitative easing

DANIEL HANSON, Economics Researcher at the American Enterprise Institute

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.

Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.

You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
Oklahoma Tornado Reminds Us of the Value of Teachers

The Oklahoma tornado reminds us of all the roles teachers take on.

IRS, AP and James Rosen Scandals Strike at the First Amendment

The Obama scandals paint a picture of an administration at odds with the First Amendment.

Anthony Weiner Is Too Liberal to Be New York City Mayor

New York City doesn't need another Democratic mayor.

Organizations Masquerading as Tax-Exempt is the Real IRS Scandal

The real scandal at the IRS is electioneering groups getting tax-exempt status.

E.W. Jackson Proves the Tea Party Learned Nothing

By nominating E.W. Jackson, Virginia Republicans hope extremism will save them.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Are Not Obama Scandals

The word "scandal" doesn't appropriately describe anything going on in Washington these days.

Democrats Should Be Worried About Polls After Obama Scandals

Democrats should be more worried about President Obama's approval ratings.

Tea Party IRS Rally Should Wait Until After Moore Tornado Recovery

Tea party rallies against the IRS should wait until the tornado victims are taken care of.

Advertisement