Should There Be Less Disclosure in Campaign Finance?
As the presidential campaign and bombardment of attacks ads that come with it kick into high gear, the issue of campaign finance is at the forefront, specifically the debate surrounding disclosure of donors to nonprofit organizations that get involved in political campaigns. Under current law, the names of those who donate a certain amount of money to candidates or parties must be released. The DISCLOSE Act would extend these standards to organizations, even those registered as nonprofits, that choose to fund TV commercials or other campaign materials. Republican lawmakers have stopped the legislation from becoming law, some arguing less disclosure is needed, not more.
At a speech at conservative think tank American Enterprise Institute last week, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell argued that the anonymity of those who donate to political organizations is protected by the First Amendment right to freedom of speech. "And that's why it is critically important for all conservatives—and indeed all Americans—to stand up and unite in defense of the freedom to organize around the causes we believe in and against any effort that would constrain our ability to do so." He suggested that the Obama administration bullies those who donate to organizations critical of his presidency, citing an IRS investigation of the nonprofit status of some Tea Party-affiliated groups.
Wednesday, Rep. Chris Van Hollen rebutted McConnell's claims in a speech at the National Press Club. "[O]ur democracy is strengthened when all of us participate openly in the political process, and that when people are deciding to use money to try and influence voters' decisions in an election, voters have a right to know who's financing those, and there's a very important public interest and public good advanced by those disclosure requirements." He countered McConnell's argument that disclosure suppresses freedom of speech: "Disclosure doesn't prevent any individual or corporation or union from running a single political advertisement."
Should there be less disclosure in campaign finance? Here's the Debate Club's take:
The Arguments
No — We need laws that hold elected officials accountable for their supporters
MEREDITH MCGEHEE, Policy Director at the Campaign Legal Center Comment
No — Campaign finance disclosure requirements allow Americans to interpret ads they see
ROBERT WEISSMAN, President of Public Citizen Comment
No — Voters need to know who is giving money, and what they want in return
SHEILA KRUMHOLZ, Executive Director at the Center for Responsive Politics. Comment
Yes — Donors are required to file excessively long reports that have no meaning
DAVID N. BOSSIE, President of Citizens United and Citizens United Productions Comment (2)
Yes — Knowing who donated how much to what campaign, no matter the amount, is a violation of privacy
DAVID KEATING, President of Center for Competitive Politics Comment (2)
